Apparently radiation might also be a problem.
08.02.2026 12:34 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0@domw.bsky.social
Chief economist at Absolute Strategy Research in London. But all of the nonsense I spout on here is mine and mine alone. RTs are not endorsements unless they are.
Apparently radiation might also be a problem.
08.02.2026 12:34 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Orange and purple, no?
07.02.2026 21:34 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Listened to this Oddlots episode with utilities analyst Andy DeVries this morning. Some useful pushback on the data center/AI power demand narrative that's worth working through. 1/
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
Honestly, I think these surveys tell us so much about the country.
07.02.2026 11:22 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0βYeah, Iβd scratch the bearβs eyes out and then step into the arena and win the gold at table tennis.β
07.02.2026 10:29 β π 23 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0What was the percentage who thought they could beat a bear in a fight again?
07.02.2026 10:26 β π 51 π 10 π¬ 10 π 15Yeah, I think thatβs really the catch here. If you canβt, youβll just end up with higher prices in that sector and (possibly) higher productivity but lower consumer surplus.
07.02.2026 09:21 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Think thatβs probably right. But it depends on other things too, right? How easy is it to sub capital for labour in those industries? How do relative prices in low-wage sectors move, and how does consumer demand respond?
07.02.2026 09:08 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I wonder how much of it is a compositional effect? Itβs the low wage/low productivity sectors that have been affected most by the minimum wage & employer NICs combo. So could just be an averaging-type effect.
07.02.2026 08:52 β π 9 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0These lines go up. This line doesnβt go up.
07.02.2026 08:21 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Well, yes. In simple terms, markets pull the plug on investment booms because investors become less sure that they'll get the returns they anticipated.
06.02.2026 16:00 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0One thing to point out about the AI story: previous investment booms haven't ended because the technology in question failed to live up to the hype. Did the dotcom boom turn to bust because it turned out the internet wasn't all that?
06.02.2026 15:49 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Worth it just for the lede
06.02.2026 15:20 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Both a consequence of the cold weather?
06.02.2026 15:07 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Closer to the snow = more precision
06.02.2026 15:02 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Broadsheet comic books?
06.02.2026 11:05 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I donβt know the answer but is this what you were getting excited about last night? π
06.02.2026 11:01 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Have they considered a ballroom?
06.02.2026 09:18 β π 10 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0No, Wednesday next week.
06.02.2026 09:09 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Itβs absolutely gold.
05.02.2026 22:44 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Itβs great isnβt it.
British traitors: βIβm sorry, I had no other evidence so Iβm voting for yourself.β
Irish traitors: βyouβre a fecking traitor, so you are.β
Iβd have to look at the numbers again, but think itβs covered by operating cashflow after dividends, yes.
05.02.2026 22:03 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I imagine theyβre quite high for the Taiwanese economy.
05.02.2026 21:42 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Itβs obviously a story that has been well understood by markets for a long time. But is the macroeconomic significance of this fully understood? Not sure.
The *upward revision* to capex over the last 12m is more than 1% of GDP.
12 months ago the hyperscalers were expected to spend $300bn on capex in 2026. Now Amazon and Alphabet will spend comfortably more than that between the two of them ($375bn).
05.02.2026 21:17 β π 71 π 12 π¬ 5 π 3That would be super kind of you, George. I might have to drop you a DM when itβs released.
05.02.2026 17:16 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Dagnabbit!
05.02.2026 17:15 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Is it released in UK/Europe on the same date?
05.02.2026 16:14 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0I think Thom Tillis possibly likes Kevin Warsh as Fed Chair nominee.
05.02.2026 16:05 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I concur
05.02.2026 11:33 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0