do you think people read the post to mean that those articles were removed from the constitution, rather than simply from the webpage?

Philipp Amthor

This is me among you olds

China declares all crypto-currency transactions illegal Trading Bitcoin and other crypto-currenices is a criminal activity, China's central bank says.

www.bbc.com/news/technol...

this is based on a 2021 bbc article

theres a line for everyone😍

Individual capitalists acting in their own self interest doesn't always serve capitalism as a whole

of course i voted for the person i focus my single minded disgust on you idiot, what would make you think otherwise?

its also that we see a face in every combination of two dots and a line

most conversations could mean different things by switching out a few words

its very possible these majorities don't overlap

That's why it's important to conceptualize the Door Dash Discourse as being about full employment and wages.

this is of course just the incorrect generalisation of the fact that a lot of sexism and homophobia is downstream of Western colonial powers spreading Christianity

it never caught on because saying you are a socialist is dumb in america

oh you think an elected politician could be anything but a liberal Im sorry for your accident

has he been corrected for inflation?

racism

fake videos aren't categorycally different from fake pics or text, i think

large chunks of the right being workers who simply feel disaffected by neoliberal economic policies is one of the founding myths of american leftists

Im sad to recognize half of these as à propos of political events even if not explicitly

that doesn't really hurt their worldview

the aoc position aligns with the majority in this case, because she supports reducing offensive weapons but not iron dome (on the incorrect assumption that iron dome funds aren't fungible). Presumably the poll would find lower support for "the us is helping too much with antimissile protection.

this is a message exclusively aimed at people who don't want to give up their self identification of being "right" but could take up an opening on the specific issues

is he posing with fucking birds?

most things are a certain kind of noun

he seems to even be alluding to that specific chant, as an example of what's verboten??

higher usage doesn't automatically increase routes, especially if you cut its income

If you find 150mill lying around, the question is still open whether it should be spent on expanding the service or making it cheaper for its users. The fact that you can get money from elsewhere doesn't make that not a tradeoff

the issue is that, this does lead to a bang for your buck question. Resources spent towards reducing one of these problems could also have been spent on the other, so its actually good to know what is more important and how effectively it can be improved

that isn't really an argument against free fares, if anything it shows that its widely used