's Avatar

@kiersturmer.bsky.social

187 Followers  |  237 Following  |  4,221 Posts  |  Joined: 21.01.2025  |  2.174

Latest posts by kiersturmer.bsky.social on Bluesky

what were the "prejudices" that the left had, Lewis?

10.08.2025 20:43 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Robert Wrong

10.08.2025 20:34 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Bald

10.08.2025 18:42 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

good friend of Lammy

10.08.2025 16:58 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
@iandunt.bsky.social has blocked you

@iandunt.bsky.social has blocked you

I sent him a 5-month old video of him saying Starmer’s behaviour re: human rights doesn’t align with anything we’ve been told about his biography, then asked if this promoted any revelations and whether he looks up toward the corner when talking on webcam because he can’t look at his own reflection.

10.08.2025 16:01 β€” πŸ‘ 45    πŸ” 14    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I think people who describe themselves as liberal are often not liberal. And liberal is correctly used as a pejorative to describe those people

10.08.2025 15:25 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Paul Mason is a complete dunce

10.08.2025 15:19 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

it was on itv for the past few seasons

10.08.2025 15:11 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

funny. But the lib dems aren't that liberal

10.08.2025 14:51 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

there is no UK liberal party

10.08.2025 14:32 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Tories increased minimum wage too

10.08.2025 14:28 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

you need to give one to Colonel Richard Kemp too

10.08.2025 14:12 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

if Palestine Action were actually worthy of being proscribed then there wouldn't be any question of practicality or otherwise

10.08.2025 14:11 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

arresting people for holding placards is obviously fucking mad in the first place

10.08.2025 13:54 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"serious damage to property"

spray paint is not serious damage. obviously.

10.08.2025 13:38 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

lol

10.08.2025 13:37 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

lol

10.08.2025 13:22 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

lmao

10.08.2025 13:22 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

no I just think you are an absurd clown

10.08.2025 13:21 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Are the Tories more back-stabbing th...
8 August β€’ 19 min
NEW SINTENAN
They can do the kind of Hugh Grant love actually rhetoric. We may be a small country, but we're a great, a friend who bullies us is no longer a friend. The thing that love actually doesn't show, because it only gets up to Christmas, it doesn't show how in the New Year, the US president was so insulted by that speech that he imposed sweeping tariffs and completely destroyed the UK economy.
That's not in the film. And I think, you know, Ed Davey and the Lib Dems can afford to be that Hugh Grant style, you know, patriotic British exceptionalism, but in a kind of cuddly, nostalgic, rousing sort of way, very 90s way actually, even though it's a film that I think came out in 2003 or 2004.
Whereas if you're actually in government, you're not just thinking about Christmas, you're thinking about what comes next.

Are the Tories more back-stabbing th... 8 August β€’ 19 min NEW SINTENAN They can do the kind of Hugh Grant love actually rhetoric. We may be a small country, but we're a great, a friend who bullies us is no longer a friend. The thing that love actually doesn't show, because it only gets up to Christmas, it doesn't show how in the New Year, the US president was so insulted by that speech that he imposed sweeping tariffs and completely destroyed the UK economy. That's not in the film. And I think, you know, Ed Davey and the Lib Dems can afford to be that Hugh Grant style, you know, patriotic British exceptionalism, but in a kind of cuddly, nostalgic, rousing sort of way, very 90s way actually, even though it's a film that I think came out in 2003 or 2004. Whereas if you're actually in government, you're not just thinking about Christmas, you're thinking about what comes next.

A listener asks whether Sir Keir needs to be quite so sycophantic to Donald Trump. The lads squawk indignantly for five minutes at this terribly unfair question, and then Rachel helpfully says this:

10.08.2025 13:07 β€” πŸ‘ 23    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

"PA are preying on the weak & elderly to do PR for them"

you absolute roaster

10.08.2025 13:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"PA are supposedly funded by Iran"

what the fuck are you talking about

10.08.2025 13:06 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

"Palestine Action have a history of violence"

what the fuck are you talking about

10.08.2025 13:06 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

an absurd freak, a man with no positive qualities

10.08.2025 13:02 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"virtue signallers" you utter clown

10.08.2025 12:58 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

🀑

10.08.2025 12:49 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

with the government amplifying their "legitimate concerns"

10.08.2025 12:33 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"virtue signallers" have you lost your mind

10.08.2025 12:31 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Great response

10.08.2025 12:30 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

how many of the people arrested yesterday were parts of the "organisation"?

10.08.2025 12:30 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@kiersturmer is following 19 prominent accounts