Average Rando (not) on twitter

I’m not understanding this. The Kia has worse drag coefficient and is heavier. Why are you adding 7%? Do you mean that the Kia would be 7% better if it weren’t for a worse drag coefficient? You also seem to equate drag coefficient with weight unless I’m misunderstanding.

Agreed. Which I mentioned in my post. But also, GPT is being trained and retrained constantly. I quoted a single training session. I was addressing how Altman just dismissed it as no big deal because humans use energy too.

Pro-tax. Ffs autocorrect

I suspect it’s that weird desire to “differentiate” from other stories.

I was curious so I did some googling. 70 yr lifetime for a human (I.e. not just “training”): 321 GJ. Training GPT-3: 4680 GJ. So, even putting aside the complete dehumanization, his comparison is crap. His instincts/gut feelings are bad and his science is worse.

Under capitalism it's normal to let children go hungry, let banks force people out of their homes, let sick people die for lack of access to healthcare. But the idea that billionaires could just be less rich - not poor, not struggling, just less rich, is considered insane.

Time to ponder the sheer evil madness of capitalism
#socialistsunday

Not quite the same IMO. This is a or-tax post/meme. It is mocking, yes. But it’s mocking people that don’t understand that taxes pay for services. I mean, if you want to block all the arrogant posters, sure. Go for it. But you’ve got a lot of Americans to block too then.

Plus that video ends with the eagle giving up and flying away and the goose living on. So there’s that.

And also, Greens will likely moderate on the issue as they approach power. Just like Labour did in the 1920s on economic/worker policy.

77% of UK public back global nuclear weapons ban - CND 59% of the public think that the UK should sign up to a new UN treaty outlawing nuclear weapons, while 77% support a total global nuclear weapons ban, according to new polling by Survation for the Cam...

Sure, but 59% agree with what the ACTUAL Green policy is. cnduk.org/77-of-uk-pub.... And defence rarely cracks 30% in Yougov’s most important issues poll.

Part Five – The nuclear dilemma: Britons on weapons of mass destruction | YouGov The majority of Britons think that nuclear weapons are making the world a more dangerous place and that countries should give up nuclear weapons. Despite this, half would support the UK using nuclear ...

I told you about an actual poll (there are several - here’s a nuanced one: yougov.co.uk/politics/art...). But guess your feelings matter more. Believe what you want. Just like the Liberals did in the 20s.

Counterpoint: people don’t much care about that an will vote for kitchen table issues. Plus pills show almost 2/3 of UK voters support joining TPNW

Ironically what the Canadian shooters were saying about all those shots that should have gone in.

Well, if you voted for him last year your vote didn’t count. But yeah, you’re still probably correct.

Now that’s not fair. This dummy is WAY more expressive and intelligent than Bessent.

Just gave my TV the finger twice a minute or so apart.

I suppose that’s what the Liberals said back in the 20s. Now if Labour would return to their labour roots then you’d probably be right. But the way they’re going now? It could happen.

Sure, but his heir don’t do so well even though by all accounts he supported actual reforms and good things. Should Vance and DeSantis be worried?

In a number of ways. Besides the obvious, it was built as a distraction for the nobles so that Louis could word power unchecked. I mean, good comparison I guess???

Yeah but unfortunately the upchucks still get medals

Surely Canada and USA can come together in agreement on that?

I don’t mind the US beating Canada for gold, but I hate that the upchuck brothers get gold.

The social media posters he’s talking about aren’t politicians for one. And this new claim you’re making is also being made without evidence. It’s just as likely that moneyed opponents of those left/populist politicians are “smearing” them as being rich while pretending to be poor.

But then they make the story about will rather than the resistance. Why?

Sorry. I poorly worded that. It wasn’t meant to be directed at you, but at RW people “discovering” this about Greenland.

Ummmm, you know USA did this too, right? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sterili...

Yea this was my point. Everyone so hung up on thinking I believed I was due a response. No. It’s that his take is insane and red-pilled.

And said that in my other comment. Have a good day.

Ahhh, you started so well there. There was nothing bad faith about MY take, which I gave above.

It was me. I called him out. He literally ignored me. I asked him for evidence of his claim. He did not respond. It’s literally true. I was making no claim about whether he replies to a lot of things. I said he ignores specific things.