's Avatar

@kmkraus.bsky.social

859 Followers  |  833 Following  |  631 Posts  |  Joined: 16.11.2024  |  2.6576

Latest posts by kmkraus.bsky.social on Bluesky


Why are you not providing a source or link?

15.02.2026 00:07 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

Anna, will you and the Lawfare team be breaking this down for us, helping us understand why the judge would have signed off and what happens next? Thank you so much, as always, for the incredible work you do!

11.02.2026 00:12 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Love this.

04.02.2026 00:29 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

If you wear makeup (I don't), perhaps it's time to boycott EstΓ©e Lauder products.

30.01.2026 16:54 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

If you're living somewhere outside the USA, one thing you can do is pressure your leaders to boycott World Cup and Olympic events here.

24.01.2026 20:29 β€” πŸ‘ 39738    πŸ” 11363    πŸ’¬ 759    πŸ“Œ 621

If you can, I think you should watch. I believe it’s our collective civic duty to bear witness. Brave bystanders whose own lives are at risk are documenting these atrocities for our eyes and the eyes of posterity.

24.01.2026 16:12 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
FBI opened probe on Minneapolis shooting; none exists now, Justice Dept. says After the death of RenΓ©e Good in Minneapolis, FBI agents launched a civil rights probe into the shooting. The Justice Department says no such case now exists.

An FBI agent conducted an initial review of the Renee Good killing and determined sufficient grounds existed to open a civil rights probe into the actions of the ICE officer who shot her. Justice Department says no inquiry is warranted. @perrystein.bsky.social www.washingtonpost.com/national-sec...

19.01.2026 18:59 β€” πŸ‘ 7225    πŸ” 2986    πŸ’¬ 228    πŸ“Œ 146

Thanks! I value the perspective of someone who works in the field of nutrition. Especially since HHS and FDA are no longer reliable, trustworthy sources of information.

08.01.2026 17:37 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

But whole fat dairy? Saturated fats pride of place in the diagram? In moderation, okay--fine. But full-throated embrace?

08.01.2026 17:13 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Would love it if you would elaborate! Including a giant slab of beef near the top of the pyramid diagram seems a little . . . sketchy. Huge emphasis on protein seems good for some demographics, like post-menopausal women.

08.01.2026 17:13 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

We are so thrilled to have you here! NYC ❀️

08.01.2026 15:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Oops, I just noticed that @fiona-webster22.bsky.social already made the point it's the object of a preposition. So yeah, she's exactly right.

20.12.2025 20:09 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

I love this sort of grammar conundrum! I confess I'm not entirely sure. But I'll note that "whom" is the object of the preposition "about". So I think it should indeed be "whom" not "who."

20.12.2025 20:07 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

If anyone can explain what happens next, I’d be very appreciative. Does this put paid to Boasberg’s contempt proceedings, or is there still a possibility they’ll proceed down the road?

12.12.2025 23:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Thank you as always, Anna! Can you also provide some analysis to put these developments in context and explain their significance?

19.11.2025 19:12 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I'm very, very skeptical. Maybe "suspicious" is the better word. I suspect Trump may have a deal with Bondi that none of the documents bearing his name--even if redacted--will be released. He owns the DOJ--why in the world wouldn't they just filter those documents out?

17.11.2025 04:30 β€” πŸ‘ 17    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Pelosi would not have let this happen. Harry Reid would not have let this happen. Any effective Democratic leader would not have let this happen.

10.11.2025 01:39 β€” πŸ‘ 28    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Thank you, Senator Van Hollen. Proud to have you as my senator.

10.11.2025 01:35 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Thank you so much, Senator Slotkin. Now it’s time for Democrats to replace @schumer.senate.gov

10.11.2025 01:31 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Thank you for saying this and pointing it out. I think you’re spot on that empathy and real, innovative policy shifts that make a difference are key. Let’s not mock or deride people who say they feel unsafe.

07.11.2025 16:52 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Thank you so much!

07.11.2025 16:27 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This is exactly I was wondering as well. I was going to send my uncle (who is on SNAP) a Whole Foods gift certificate on the assumption the gov was refusing to distribute dollars. But I can’t figure out if the fed is now distributing the money, or if some blue states are just paying out of pocket.

07.11.2025 16:15 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

A hackneyed, tired, boring, unoriginal metaphor. A metaphor that, rhetorically, one might have thought you'd deliberately steer clear of if your intention was to accuse *someone else* of "overused" tropes. Cheers!

04.11.2025 15:04 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The most amusing thing to me is that you were annoyed by my "overused" trope, yet you twice took recourse in "slop" to describe it. "Slop": a metaphor this platform is already saturated, drenched, soaked in. A path-of-least-resistance, lowest common denominator metaphor.

04.11.2025 15:04 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Thank you so much for your grace and civility--I so deeply appreciate it. Have a wonderful day!

03.11.2025 22:25 β€” πŸ‘ 92    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Anna, can you please address if this is legal?

03.11.2025 21:54 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

OMGβ€”You win the internet today!

03.11.2025 17:35 β€” πŸ‘ 285    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Chilling. Thank you so much, Ronan.

24.10.2025 21:17 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Republicans now disavow the ideas they once championed.

24.10.2025 14:44 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Everyone always forgets that the Affordable Care Act borrowed heavily from GOP ideas about healthcare coverage to try to win Republican support. Of course that hope failed spectacularly, but that’s one reason why Democrats didn’t try for single payer, etc.

24.10.2025 14:44 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@kmkraus is following 20 prominent accounts