I really wish we'd stop calling them climate "skeptics" or "vaccine skeptics", if you jump off a cliff we don't call you a "gravity skeptic"
25.11.2025 20:18 โ ๐ 5515 ๐ 1378 ๐ฌ 151 ๐ 71@pfriedling.bsky.social
Born at 321 ppm. Climate & Carbon Cycle Scientist. Prof @UniofExeter Directeur de Recherche @CNRS @GlobalCarbonProject
I really wish we'd stop calling them climate "skeptics" or "vaccine skeptics", if you jump off a cliff we don't call you a "gravity skeptic"
25.11.2025 20:18 โ ๐ 5515 ๐ 1378 ๐ฌ 151 ๐ 71bsky.app/profile/pfri...
25.11.2025 19:49 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Last year record increase in atmospheric COโ (3.7ppm), well above the decadal average of about 2.5 ppm, was due to the El Niรฑo conditions.
25.11.2025 19:47 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0That statement is misleading:
โฆโ the concentration of carbon in Earthโs atmosphere rose more in 2024 than in any other year ..โ
โClimate scientists unanimously agree that last yearโs increase was provoked by human activities, especially the burning of fossil fuels like oil, coal and natural gas.โ
For once, some good news about the Amazon tropical forest ๐ณ
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Eager for more details?
๐ Check our full Research Highlight here:bit.ly/4qMYPEy
With @docaharper.bsky.social from @universityofga.bsky.social @exeter.ac.uk, Gabriel Abrahรฃo, from @pik-potsdam.bsky.social and @rosieafisher.bsky.social, from @cicero.oslo.no
๐
22.11.2025 07:45 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0 ๐
โWhen it comes to climate change, the โend of the worldโ and โgood for youโ are โthe two lowest-probability outcomesโ.
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
Direct air capture is not currently viable strategy. Likely increases carbon pollution (more carbon energy required to than saved). See @mzjacobson.bsky.social's work: news.stanford.edu/stories/2019... & Joe Romm's review for our center (@penncssm.bsky.social): bpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/web.sas.upen...
15.11.2025 17:07 โ ๐ 56 ๐ 31 ๐ฌ 5 ๐ 5Trรจs bel entretien ๐
17.11.2025 00:28 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Au GIEC, une bataille trรจs politique autour des dates de publication du prochain rapport dโรฉvaluation. Pour la 4e fois en 2 ans, les pays nโont pas rรฉussi ร sโaccorder sur son calendrier. Certains pays veulent repousser sa parution pour amoindrir lโaction climatique www.lemonde.fr/planete/arti...
15.11.2025 15:41 โ ๐ 31 ๐ 18 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Bar chart showing estimates of remaining carbon dioxide budgets that give a 50% likelihood of staying below each temperature level, relative to pre-industrial levels. A baseline label shows global emissions in 2025 at 42 gigatonnes (Gt) per year. Three vertical bars show remaining CO2 budgets: stay below 1.5ยฐC โ 170 Gt, labeled as 4 years of current emissions, with a note that if emissions stay at 2025 levels the 1.5ยฐC budget will be exhausted within 4 years; stay below 1.7ยฐC โ 525 Gt, labeled as 12.5 years of current emissions; stay below 2ยฐC โ 1055 Gt, labeled as 25 years of current emissions, with an annotation saying that by 2050 we will have exhausted the 2ยฐC budget unless emissions are reduced now. Footer note states these estimates have uncertainty and depend on changes in non-CO2 greenhouse gases such as methane and nitrous oxide. Data sources listed as IPCC, Forster et al. (2025) and Global Carbon Project (2025). License CC BY.
How much COโ can the world emit while limiting global temperature rise?
15.11.2025 09:01 โ ๐ 76 ๐ 35 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 6You could also mention that the projected atmospheric COโ growth rate will be much lower in 2025 (2.6ppm, red dot on the figure).
14.11.2025 21:54 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0bsky.app/profile/pfri...
14.11.2025 21:39 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0You are confusing COโ emissions and COโ concentrations.
14.11.2025 21:38 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0And thank you for your contribution ๐
14.11.2025 12:52 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0ourworldindata.org/explorers/co2
13.11.2025 18:37 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0www.sustainabilitybynumbers.com/p/global-car...
13.11.2025 18:37 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-fos...
13.11.2025 18:37 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0@hausfath.bsky.social
bsky.app/profile/haus...
Other posts/additional resources
Additional resources:
@glenpeters
bsky.app/profile/glen...
More figures, data, etc on the GCB website:
globalcarbonbudget.org
Net zero trajectories
Keeping warming well below 2ยฐC is still within reach, but with massive acceleration of emission mitigation.
Itโs time to step up, not to give up.
The remaining carbon budget for 1.7ยฐC or 2ยฐC is 525 GtCO2 and 1055 GtCO2 respectively, equivalent to 12 and 25 years of current COโ emissions.
13.11.2025 18:37 โ ๐ 9 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Remaining carbon budget charts
Time is up for 1.5ยฐC. The remaining carbon budget for 1.5ยฐC is virtually exhausted: 170 GtCO2, equivalent to 4 years at the 2025 emissions levels.
13.11.2025 18:37 โ ๐ 22 ๐ 13 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 1Last, we update the remaining carbon budget, that is the amount of COโ humanity can still emit in the future while limiting global warming to 1.5ยฐC , 1.7ยฐC or 2ยฐC.
13.11.2025 18:37 โ ๐ 8 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0climate impact on the sinks and on atmospheric COโ
Since 1960, that climate impact leads to a loss of carbon from land and ocean (relative to what they would have been without climate change). We attribute that 8ppm (8%) of the observed atmospheric COโ increase of 100 ppm since 1960 is due to this weakening of the sinks.
13.11.2025 18:37 โ ๐ 13 ๐ 2 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0effect of climate change on teh land and ocean sinks
We also analysed the effect of climate change on the sinks using our models separating the effect of increased atmospheric COโ, from the effect of climate change.
Result: The land and ocean sinks would have been 25% and 7% larger in the absence of climate change.