Course, if he does look good for perhaps a 2500 min season, ramping up from a gentler start to play more, thatβs different for squad building to if he remains an occasional impact sub.
23.02.2026 06:29 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@benzalin.bsky.social
NHS doctor. Pedant
Course, if he does look good for perhaps a 2500 min season, ramping up from a gentler start to play more, thatβs different for squad building to if he remains an occasional impact sub.
23.02.2026 06:29 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Weβll know more as the season goes on but itβs hard to see him playing a regular part by the start of 26/27, even if heβs played quite a bit more. Simply isnβt time to get his workload up to more than the occasional full game in six months, I donβt think, without being irresponsible about it.
23.02.2026 06:29 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I mean, sure, would be hopeful he can improve his heading and other aspects of his game but heβs been really good overall, especially when the plan presumably was to play him early season while Isak got up to speed, then use him relatively sparingly.
22.02.2026 18:25 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0His finishing overall and heading especially were highlighted as areas of his game that werenβt great when he moved, albeit heβd only had one season below his xG so probably just natural variation. His finishing has been really good and heβs buried a few headers, so donβt think we can complain.
22.02.2026 18:25 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Want trying to imply you said they were, just that theyβre good enough to do it with that cushion. I hope they donβt (well, not at expense of LFC, obvs, v happy for them to finish ahead of Chelsea and United) but itβs a lot of good runs from other teams needed to get several past them.
21.02.2026 17:08 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Theyβve got a big cushion and arenβt a *bad* team, so are pretty likely to cling on.
21.02.2026 16:52 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Yes, itβs an odd one. Donβt think Villa are the best run club but they usually do a decent enough job of getting Emery players heβll use, even if they max out the credit card doing it.
21.02.2026 16:33 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0This has gone badly for all involved. Presume Emery, who doesnβt like a wide forward, thought he would use Harvey quite a lot narrow, which is his game but deal structure then loomed large once he turned out not to fancy him v much after all.
21.02.2026 16:08 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Oh yeah, v much so.
21.02.2026 15:53 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I know, theyβve been a mid table standard side!
21.02.2026 15:49 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Does it really count if Villa themselves have created even less?
21.02.2026 15:46 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0So there is quite a bit of irrationality. Donβt get me started on some of the Brexit markets. But itβs not quite as insane as all that.
20.02.2026 12:48 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0At that point Biden was behind in all of them and Trump winning was v possible, although the blue shift phenomenon with postal ballots did mean Bidenβs chances looked good to the cognoscenti.
Trumpβs Betfair predicted chance of winning was in in about 10-20 even once all states counted.
I donβt think this is right. The betting markets had quite a lot of irrational beliefs about the American presidential election, including that Trump *might* win when heβd officially lost but Biden hadnβt mathematically won anything by the day after the election. Several states were still counting.
20.02.2026 12:44 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0This is the nerd equivalent of the line from βThe Secret Diary of Adrian Moleβ where he says heβs an intellectual but not v clever.
20.02.2026 10:08 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Lol, rechecked and looks like I was right initially, when I did it in my head and screwed up checking it on the calculator, because 350m is too big a number to write in correctly.
20.02.2026 10:07 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0It turns out percentages are hard and I meant about 40 thousand!
20.02.2026 10:04 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Donβt you reckon the public really think there are nearly half a million ultra rich, transgender, atheist Jewish New Yorkers?
20.02.2026 09:51 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Not even close either, only 3 teams did better than half as well.
20.02.2026 09:43 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0That or no theory of mind for 99% plus of the population. Well, could be both, I suppose.
20.02.2026 09:18 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Being too online, I read a whole argument provoked by this before coming across a post enlightening me that this was a *pro* comic, not one mocking prison abolitionists.
Oh those people with v valid questions Iβd prefer not to answer? I ignore them, obvs.
If only there were some remedial action she could take at this stage. Ah well.
17.02.2026 20:28 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Yeah, odd situation where at times heβs held better distance from v obvious racism than the Tories, while happily blowing the right dog whistles. Itβs a skill but not easy when under pressure from the right.
Thereβs also a risk to not running a one man band forever, given heβs hard to work with.
You must be at least somewhat proud. I certainly would be.
16.02.2026 21:48 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Could not recommend.
16.02.2026 21:04 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Grew up near there. Lubo is correct,
Iβm afraid.
Incredible that Spurs finished 4th, even with the favourable draw which most of the EPL teams had (as not having to face one another). The really amazing thing is that they werenβt even all that lucky in doing it. The EPL is a stupidly strong league this season.
16.02.2026 12:19 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Third! Admittedly, amounts to the same thing.
16.02.2026 12:08 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Yeah, thatβs v fair.
I think the conversation generally about the spectrum from diving, through buying fouls up to being unambiguously fouled is discussed in a pretty thoughtless way, especially as player reaction to the foul can be on a slightly different axis, which makes it quite complicated.
Well, I think itβs fair to say it was very good attacking play and he quite likely timed going to ground well. I donβt mean that as a criticism: in general he gets given far fewer fouls than he deserves.
15.02.2026 15:06 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0