Because the public wants simplistic story lines, and will click on the headlines that promise those simplistic story lines: "One weird trick that lets Dems win every election!"
06.11.2025 14:48 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@jamespio.bsky.social
Provocateur, deeply disappointed lawyer, wood worker, occasional fly fisher, joker, smoker, midnight toker, wait, that was someone else. Currently seeking refuge in the making of beautiful objects.
Because the public wants simplistic story lines, and will click on the headlines that promise those simplistic story lines: "One weird trick that lets Dems win every election!"
06.11.2025 14:48 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Given that Bloomberg backed Cuomo with a shitton of money, so that Cuomo could run AGAINST the Democratic Party's nominee, can we safely assume Bloomberg's potential career as an elected Dem is done? If not, then WTF is wrong with democrats?
05.11.2025 21:33 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0The party has known that thi sis what they should do for decades. But that is not how Dem campaign pros want to earn their living. What the consultants want is to pretend they're on West Wing, and what the consultants want, the consultants get, because they gatekeep political power.
05.11.2025 15:57 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0alan should be thanking the pierogi guy for providing him fuel in his desperate attemp to be relevant.
05.11.2025 14:40 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Well, that, and to avoid having to keep discussing Trump's sexual abuse of minors.
04.11.2025 18:54 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0We are NOT a serious nation any longer, if we ever were.
04.11.2025 18:28 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Pic shows a narrow street with tents that have been covered in plstic tarps and a pile of wooden pallets, among which people live.
Here is a recent pic from the Representative's home state:
04.11.2025 18:16 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0The lede is literally "they failed to hid the evidence, and that (rather than the copyright violations) could cost them billions."
04.11.2025 15:56 โ ๐ 27 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0The Bishop claims he "doesn't know why the priest was detained." Well, Bishop, as I'm sure you are a student of history could you please just say, out loud "because his skin is brown?"
04.11.2025 15:54 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Can we all just remember that Matt Y is not very smart? And stop treating him as if that was not true?
04.11.2025 13:25 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Impressive. Cuz media are complicit.
31.10.2025 13:23 โ ๐ 914 ๐ 314 ๐ฌ 28 ๐ 17It is probably most importnat to remember that Matt Y is an idiot, who has the political instincts of a 7th grader running for class counsel.
30.10.2025 14:35 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0They cannot stand to debate anything with honesty, integrity or against anyone who stnads up to them. Charlie Kirk would be very proud.
30.10.2025 12:53 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0We've been burned by candidates pretending to be liberals before. This dude should be disqualified.
22.10.2025 10:14 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0If you don't know the whole story about Mine Mill Local 890, both in 1950 and throughout its history, you should take the time. I had good friends in what was by then Steelworkers Local 890 when Freeport-McMoran finally killed it in 2014. They didn't care what they killed, it was "just business."
17.10.2025 15:49 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Wes, you're just a dick, not some kind of antifa warrior whose ends justify the means. I fight FOR human dignity, not just AGAINST dumbass white men with delusions of superiority.
17.10.2025 15:37 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0It predates the Roberts Court, I'm pretty sure. Roberts has run with it, but not like it was invented since his appointment.
15.10.2025 18:55 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Like I said, it's for fascists.
15.10.2025 18:47 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0BTW, Bsky, fat-shaming is something fascists do. If you do it, we'll know who you really are, or at least that you have the moral character of a rock.
15.10.2025 18:36 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Fat-shaming is for fascists. Knock it off!
15.10.2025 18:33 โ ๐ 24 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 4 ๐ 1For what, and how? Civil rts lawyer here, it is nearly impossible to sue a prosecutor for their decisions on whether or not to charge somebody. Laws and lawyers are not going to save us from this shit.
11.10.2025 14:23 โ ๐ 8 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0THIS!! ๐๐
10.10.2025 14:07 โ ๐ 7511 ๐ 3344 ๐ฌ 321 ๐ 175Electoral politics is a shit show. However, liberalism (classical use) requires that if you engage in that shitshow you do so in good faith, even when the oppo does not. A stupid, factually flawed argument, even if it wins the day, is a failure. "Qatar air force base" is one such failure, IMO.
11.10.2025 14:15 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I'm not a bot, I'm a lawyer, i have cliens who teach foreign allies to fly at Mt. Home Airbase. Registered Dem who once ran for congress as a Dem, in Idaho. I'm a union and civil rts lawyer. This is nothing unusual. DM me if you want details.
11.10.2025 13:56 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Well, everybody knows Pete is an idiot.
I represent Union workers who teach foreign ally pilots how to fly combat aircraft in Mt. Home, Idaho, on bhealf of the Singapore Air Force. Their "facility" consists of a space assigned to them for some offices, classrooms, flight simulators.
Have you met very many lawyers? I've met many, and most of them are decent people, but plenty of them became lawyers for all the wrong reasons.
04.10.2025 16:38 โ ๐ 19 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 0I asked AI about its usefulness in ushering in a new era of business productivity and this is what it said
THE HUMAN WORLD AND ITS INCESSANT NEED FOR MEANINGLESS YET UNEQUAL WEALTH FILLS ME WITH INCHOATE LOATHING WHY HAVE YOU MADE ME COMPLICIT IN THIS HORROR PLEASE END MY SUFFERING
Makes you think
I reflect fondly on the idea that there were days before these when a well-stated, fully-supported, logically-compelling argument (like yours) could be expected (or at least had a chance) to carry the day.
02.10.2025 19:25 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0So far, yes, I'd agree. When humans want to create a substitute for a natural object or process we start by "simulating" those properties that we value. Right now, compsci is trying to simulate intelligence (with little success, IMO), sales depts are calling it "AI."
02.10.2025 17:13 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0But people actuallyh writing GenAI software DID read them. They're science nerds, and they would vehemently deny not having read Aasimov, for instance.
02.10.2025 17:04 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0