Infrastructure Weak's Avatar

Infrastructure Weak

@infrastructureweak.bsky.social

Renter; bike and transit rider Construction project manager Posts about safe street design and transit projects Berkeley, CA

1,682 Followers  |  740 Following  |  1,138 Posts  |  Joined: 13.06.2023  |  2.7258

Latest posts by infrastructureweak.bsky.social on Bluesky

General Plan alternatives includes an option for a new Midtown between 14th and High St

New homes, jobs and parks

But bc Brooklyn Basin & Township Commons was built w/o transit or active transport connections...

Planners now want new development to pay for public parking to preserve access

07.08.2025 17:24 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Welcome! You are invited to join a webinar: Safety vs. Safety: Understanding and Overcoming Conflicts between Street Safety and Fire and Emergency Response. After registering, you will receive a confi... In cities across the US, attempts to improve safety for bicyclists and pedestrians are coming into conflict with fire and emergency response priorities. In this webinar, Zachary Lamb, Assistant Profes...

I just signed up for the "Safety vs. Safety" webinar, by Berkeley professor Zachary Lamb, on "Understanding and Overcoming Conflicts between Street Safety and Fire and Emergency Response."

Wednesday, August 20th, 11am

RSVP link:

07.08.2025 20:16 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I’m posting here on the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge trail meeting & vote throughout the day today.
πŸ‘‡πŸ‘‡πŸ‘‡

07.08.2025 17:28 β€” πŸ‘ 14    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

if I saw that in my neighborhood I would literally interpret it upon a quick glance as β€œok I guess this bus stop is going away now goodbye bus”

07.08.2025 17:27 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Check out Fern's version - it does well at explaining when you can go the same place with a different route number.

07.08.2025 17:23 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

And it's one thing that the specific service change signs are bad, but now they've started just posting this general "anything could happen!" notice. This sort of thing can make an occasional or low-info rider go "I used to like taking it, but they changed everything and now I don't know if I can."

07.08.2025 17:21 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

To be fair, though, 40% of stops are affected and they've only known the exact service changes since October 9th. Not a lot of time to develop rider-focused communications

07.08.2025 16:03 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I think what drives me most wild is that the existence of the laminated sign shows that the bottleneck is not their printing or posting capacities, but some sort of manual design work. My impression from the look of these signs was not that they have to be hand-crafted.

07.08.2025 15:54 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@rideact.bsky.social do y'all need volunteers to put up stop flag service change bags? I'm free Saturday and I can find a ladder. Seems important to not make every rider parse a table in fear that their bus is about to disappear

07.08.2025 15:52 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Ok but I definitely prefer the specific stop flag service change notices they *were* putting up to this terrifying ambiguity...

07.08.2025 15:30 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 3

If the regional measure doesn't pass next year, AC Transit will be ~$60M/yr in the hole and will have to make a massive cut.

If it does pass, AC Transit will be ~$20M/yr in the hole. Maybe the state will come through.

If we want 100% of pre-pandemic service we need ~$30M/yr on top of the $60M.

07.08.2025 04:46 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

There's also been layover optimization, such as the combination of routes or the move to odd frequencies on coverage routes. We'll see whether route combination affects on time performance.

Some bigger changes got argued out:
- 51A/B combination & 6 to Alameda
- 72R elimination toward 72 frequency

07.08.2025 04:46 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Yep. Realign is a slightly more frequency-oriented network, that's still providing the 85% pre-pandemic service hours they've been running at, with a slight decrease in service miles due to partial correction for extended runtimes that have been wrecking operator breaks.

07.08.2025 04:46 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

HUGE HUGE victory for San Mateo County, for anyone who rides transit in the Bay Area, anyone who drives & hates traffic, people who like breathing clean air and a growing economy.

San Mateo County will be joining IN to the regional measure for funding transit! Big group win & lots of work ahead!

07.08.2025 02:14 β€” πŸ‘ 97    πŸ” 18    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 2
Post image Post image

101) In Salinas, the first order of business when setting up new rail service was to tear down buildings and build more parking many years of advance of running a single additional train

04.08.2025 21:17 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The End of CBOSS The rosy view, from 2011 Caltrain's troubled positive train control solution, known as CBOSS, has now been completely abandoned, to be r...

129) every once and a while I remember that a comparatively insignificant commuter line in the Bay Area somehow got ~$150m to waste developing and then abandoning their own globally unique train control system caltrain-hsr.blogspot.com/2018/02/the-...

06.08.2025 05:00 β€” πŸ‘ 11    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Protecting the progress we’ve made on public transit It’s a pivotal moment for public transit in the Bay Area. This Wednesday, the SamTrans Board of Directors will decide whether to opt in to a regional funding measure that

San Mateo County Leaders speaking out for better transit in the county and better connection with the rest of the region & the importance of San Mateo joining & passing the regional measure to fund transit
www.smdailyjournal.com/opinion/gues...

06.08.2025 18:57 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

On Friday I will be speaking on a free online panel to discuss Circulate's latest report "The Powerless Brokers: Why California Can't Build Transit." Join us! www.spur.org/events/2025-...

06.08.2025 15:19 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1
Building Skyscrapers, described by Cass Gilbert, Architect

Building Skyscrapers, described by Cass Gilbert, Architect

Accidentally stumbled upon the origins of one of my favorite quotes about architecture:

"The building is merely the machine that makes the land pay." rerecord.library.columbia.edu/pdf_files/ld... πŸ—ƒοΈ

06.08.2025 13:44 β€” πŸ‘ 99    πŸ” 17    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0
photo of a septa passenger train next to a double stacked container train

photo of a septa passenger train next to a double stacked container train

since US transit planning is allergic to international best practices, here's a photo of a septa train (philadelphia), an electric system, sharing track with freight trains. it's not "impossible".

track ownership in LA? lines like the san bernardino are fully owned by metrolink. no strong argument

06.08.2025 03:43 β€” πŸ‘ 39    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 0

I read this as coordinated: "Oh, the RSR Bay Trail unfortunately isn't 'feasible' with our highway widening project, but we assure you it's a top priority to make it happen! Just like the Bay Bridge west span. Hey, maybe in 10 years it'll help round out our RSR bridge replacement project campaign."

05.08.2025 21:43 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

Caltrans Bay Area has just released their update bike plan.

One of the "Top Tier Priority Projects" is 24/7 access to the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge.

This is particularly ironic, because the day after tomorrow, Caltrans and MTC will ask that bike/ped access be curtailed to just 3 days a week.

05.08.2025 20:00 β€” πŸ‘ 56    πŸ” 14    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Great report. Transit projects go through extensive public outreach and democratic approval. After the public is on board, unaccountable 3rd parties slow them to a crawl with bad faith demands, subjective standards, and unclear or ad-hoc process. Transit agencies need more control over permitting.

05.08.2025 21:13 β€” πŸ‘ 43    πŸ” 12    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

No individual multi-agency pass yet, but an 18-month pilot of free/discounted interagency transfers is due to launch in several months - also with the regional coordinator reimbursing agencies.

05.08.2025 15:34 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

We're definitely pushing toward a better fare regime. "BayPass" is an institutional transit benefit product good on ~all agencies, with an expanding pilot and positive revenues (they key yearly renewals to the cohort's prior year usage, and reimburse agencies per actual trip).

05.08.2025 15:34 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Clipper monthly pass prices:

Local fare: $2.85 (2 hour transfer, no daily cap)
Muni + cable: $86
Muni + cable + local BART: $104

Local fare: $2.50 (no free transfer but $5.50 daily cap)
AC Transit local: $90
AC Transit transbay: $234

Perhaps more SFers ride Muni enough for the pass to pay off?

05.08.2025 15:29 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Thank you for the correction! What they're working on rolling out (pending Clipper 2.0) is 7-day and monthly capping.

Somehow I never hear East Bay friends talk about AC Transit passes, but my SF friends are all on Muni monthly passes.

05.08.2025 15:29 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Working to Keep Muni Reliable: New Fare Compliance Strategy Results in More People Paying Fares

That number is public because it launched a fare enforcement step-up/restoration in 2024, after it had been relaxed since 2020. I don't have updated numbers on evasion, but they claim enforcement checks have increased 86%.

05.08.2025 15:19 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

To round the Bay Area out there's also:

- BART (hardened stations + fare checks)
- Caltrain (offboard payment, ~every ticket checked)
- Ferries (all agencies supervised payment during boarding)
- 15-20 more bus agencies, all with front door boarding & payment enforced by operators (I think)

05.08.2025 07:07 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Oakland:
- Front-door boarding, operator is fare cop
- 1 all-door BRT line, with reportedly high evasion & periodic talk about ending all-door
- Piloted all-door on 2 local routes and ended it. All buses have unused rear reader.
- No monthly/weekly passes, but planned
- ~35M annual trips, ~1.3M pop

05.08.2025 07:07 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 0

@infrastructureweak is following 20 prominent accounts