Lucas

No, I mean you claim of impenetrability.

I want to read his new book, but I have no German knowledge. For god sack, my English is very limited. Maybe I enjoy Rödl because he is easy to understanding from a non native. Compare his prose with McDowell.

Do you mean Self-Consciousness & Objectivity?

Hollywood is so cooked.

I think the thread is saying: those mistakes aren't bugs but stem from the llm's stochastic-parrotic nature. The tricky easy questions just make visible the *feature*.

I mean, you guys have like a canonical list of bloggers.

The role of the blogger is beginning to be surpass by the podcast bros.

One funny thing for a foreign person about the political discourse in the usa is how much it is shape by bloggers.

Type 4: Furries

Type 3: LLM are useful and mind-blowing. Probably will not generalize super well across all activities. No way its conscious lmao. The technology will stand but ain't do what they are saying they will do.

Type 2: LLM are satanic. Zitron is Jesus Christ. OpenAI will drained the Nilo River. All response from ChatGPT was programmed by Sam Altman and underpaid Ethiopian people.

Type 1: People who like LLM very much (are aware about they risk). They go bananas if you say LLM are stochastic parrots.

Decretar que a física é um programa científico que se degenerou? Uau, você precisa ser surpreendente inteligente para ter uma visão tão abrangente do estado de coisas. Ainda mais não sendo um físico treinado! Mas não o pergunte o que é um parênteses de Poisson.

Não sei se sua pergunta foi retórica, mas para mim isso é simplesmente: dizer coisas surpreendentes sobre física é sinalizar como inteligente eu sou. A @acollierastro.bsky.social tem um vídeo sobre a fascinação dos bilionários em dizer que são bons em física.

Maybe you'll enjoy it. I'm from Brazil, and the ''hairy leg'' was a real thing. It was a way for some journalists to alert some minority people about violence from the military. That's why the arc from the leg is always connected and conducted by the corrupt cops.

Sometimes both. He surely could write better. He is very clear in other texts. He fears death profundly and maybe he just wants to publish the critiques before die.

My take is that there are two types of unclarity in Kant. One is just bad writing in the sense that he could explain it better ex. Transcendental Aesthetics. The other is just that his topic is difficult, and the unclarity stems from the material itself and not from the presentation T. Deducation.

Especially when they are advertising it as an all-solving acid

I don't get why people aren't interested in the limitations or shortcomings of those tools. It's telling as much as what they are good at.

The gold medal for Brazil is from a guy trained in Norway. But it's funny that a country with no mountains and almost 5.000.000 km² of jungle has a gold medal and Finland does not.

Did you already expect the results? Will they do it again?

Pelo o que entendi, o objetivo é avaliar o quão útil as LLM são para o ''workflow'' dos matemáticos. Me parece muito mais útil como método de avaliação dos que os benchmarks tradicionais. Estou interpretando corretamente o estado de coisas?

@timhenke.bsky.social Qual a sua opinião?

What's the provisional take on the First Proofs results? Are they more impressive than the IMO gold?

Altman did some effort to look like Oppenhaimer of our time (and for some moment he did get it), but now he is known as Sloppenhaimer. This is funny.

Though I remember vaguely seeing some creeps tweeting conspiracies to kill AI researchers, back in the PAUSE AI thing.

I don't know if this is connected with the fact that I came of age in this moment, but I never experienced this level of doomer rhetoric with technology. And this is extremely disoriented and resistence is difficult. I'm surprised that we still don't see someone bomb a data center.

Yeah, I thought the same. Every time a new generative image or video model is launched, you're drowned by people ''Hollywood/game industry are cooked'' and then you watch it and it Charlie Kirk saying some tiktok trend.

Estou confuso: quando a pessoa que você cita sobre viver juntos, ele se refere as pessoas de opiniões distintas sobre IA ou sobre pessoas e as IAs?

Doesn't this lesson fit better with her heideggerian heritage?