Katya's Avatar

Katya

@katkitch.bsky.social

Geordie in Yorkshire. I am defined by no other attributes or interests.

109 Followers  |  301 Following  |  15 Posts  |  Joined: 26.11.2024  |  1.6004

Latest posts by katkitch.bsky.social on Bluesky

Ever since watching Conclave, I’ve quietly nurtured an ambition to become the first female pope. It appears the moment may have arrived. How does one throw one’s hat into the ring?

21.04.2025 12:37 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Sex Redefined: The Idea of 2 Sexes Is Overly Simplistic Biologists now think there is a larger spectrum than just binary female and male

My husband has taught human reproduction and development to the Cambridge medics for over three decades. When people start banging on about "only two biological sexes" he starts with "which sex: genetic, hormonal, or gonadal"?

Biological sex is not binary. www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-...

16.04.2025 12:03 β€” πŸ‘ 10176    πŸ” 3930    πŸ’¬ 230    πŸ“Œ 276

In light of today’s ruling,I stand in solidarity with the trans community,as an intersectional feminist and as someone who values the strength of an interpretivist epistemology.Now more than ever,we must resist reductive,positivist frameworks that deny the complexity and dignity of lived experience.

16.04.2025 12:26 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Ha yes! I’m with Rebus -his brain likely refused to store any Mark E. Smith references on principle.

16.04.2025 11:20 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@ianrankin1.bsky.social Just reading The Falls Ian. There’s no way Rebus wouldn’t think β€œMark E Smith” immediately when he saw that clue! I did and it wasn’t me who saw him 20 (make that 40!) years ago β€œat a club in Abbeyhill”. Anyway, the book has got me through a nasty dose of Covid. Thanks!

15.04.2025 07:45 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

But I want to know about woolly mammoths! 😭🐘#subsribersonly #TheAncients

01.02.2025 06:55 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

I have an issue with NYT Connections puzzle today. The blue category transgresses the principle of connectivity, replacing meaningful groupings with sequential arrangement. I haven’t seen this before and would not like to again. Connections
Puzzle #596
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟨🟨🟨🟨
🟦🟦🟦🟦
πŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺ

27.01.2025 23:17 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I haven’t! Is Peter and the Wolf about not telling fibs or frightening us into maintaining the status quo ?! (Let’s wear the wrong shoes I’m now thinking!)

29.11.2024 21:30 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

What’s the missing main clause? I agree with the sentiment of the subordinate clause.

29.11.2024 08:24 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

We thought at first that he was too much of a hard case but he’s brilliant. Moral when it counts and funny too.

29.11.2024 08:15 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

A man who wraps himself in the flag while helping billionaires dodge their taxes isn’t a patriot; he’s their snivelling loyal lackey. If undermining his own country to serve the ultra rich makes him a patriot then treachery must be the new national service. Such a toady type.

28.11.2024 15:42 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I trust if we wore the wrong shoes we wouldn’t do this. Try not to worry.

27.11.2024 22:49 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Doomy articles from the Guardian cause irregular sleep patterns, I find. You could have posted a Richard Scarry story this evening but you chose this? What’s wrong with you.

27.11.2024 01:08 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I don’t know why anyone is surprised. First she wanted us to eat turnips β€œlet them eat turnips!” Remember? She’s just adding to the punishment β€œlet them eat turnips and do exams in a hurry” It’s virtually the same.

27.11.2024 01:02 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Richard Nixon #thewrongshoes Yet this is before he knew they were wrong. He looks quite comfortable in them. He thinks he looks nice. He doesn’t yet know about board shoes.

27.11.2024 00:50 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I like how small, seemingly inconsequential moments can ripple into pivotal events. Take Richard Nixon wearing black dress shoes to the beach. A minor misstep (one Kennedy would never had made) that ushered in a paranoia culminating in Watergate. What if you wear the wrong shoes tomorrow. What then?

27.11.2024 00:47 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@katkitch is following 20 prominent accounts