Ever since watching Conclave, Iβve quietly nurtured an ambition to become the first female pope. It appears the moment may have arrived. How does one throw oneβs hat into the ring?
21.04.2025 12:37 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@katkitch.bsky.social
Geordie in Yorkshire. I am defined by no other attributes or interests.
Ever since watching Conclave, Iβve quietly nurtured an ambition to become the first female pope. It appears the moment may have arrived. How does one throw oneβs hat into the ring?
21.04.2025 12:37 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0My husband has taught human reproduction and development to the Cambridge medics for over three decades. When people start banging on about "only two biological sexes" he starts with "which sex: genetic, hormonal, or gonadal"?
Biological sex is not binary. www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-...
In light of todayβs ruling,I stand in solidarity with the trans community,as an intersectional feminist and as someone who values the strength of an interpretivist epistemology.Now more than ever,we must resist reductive,positivist frameworks that deny the complexity and dignity of lived experience.
16.04.2025 12:26 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Ha yes! Iβm with Rebus -his brain likely refused to store any Mark E. Smith references on principle.
16.04.2025 11:20 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@ianrankin1.bsky.social Just reading The Falls Ian. Thereβs no way Rebus wouldnβt think βMark E Smithβ immediately when he saw that clue! I did and it wasnβt me who saw him 20 (make that 40!) years ago βat a club in Abbeyhillβ. Anyway, the book has got me through a nasty dose of Covid. Thanks!
15.04.2025 07:45 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0But I want to know about woolly mammoths! ππ#subsribersonly #TheAncients
01.02.2025 06:55 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I have an issue with NYT Connections puzzle today. The blue category transgresses the principle of connectivity, replacing meaningful groupings with sequential arrangement. I havenβt seen this before and would not like to again. Connections
Puzzle #596
π©π©π©π©
π¨π¨π¨π¨
π¦π¦π¦π¦
πͺπͺπͺπͺ
I havenβt! Is Peter and the Wolf about not telling fibs or frightening us into maintaining the status quo ?! (Letβs wear the wrong shoes Iβm now thinking!)
29.11.2024 21:30 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Whatβs the missing main clause? I agree with the sentiment of the subordinate clause.
29.11.2024 08:24 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0We thought at first that he was too much of a hard case but heβs brilliant. Moral when it counts and funny too.
29.11.2024 08:15 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 0 π 1A man who wraps himself in the flag while helping billionaires dodge their taxes isnβt a patriot; heβs their snivelling loyal lackey. If undermining his own country to serve the ultra rich makes him a patriot then treachery must be the new national service. Such a toady type.
28.11.2024 15:42 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I trust if we wore the wrong shoes we wouldnβt do this. Try not to worry.
27.11.2024 22:49 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Doomy articles from the Guardian cause irregular sleep patterns, I find. You could have posted a Richard Scarry story this evening but you chose this? Whatβs wrong with you.
27.11.2024 01:08 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I donβt know why anyone is surprised. First she wanted us to eat turnips βlet them eat turnips!β Remember? Sheβs just adding to the punishment βlet them eat turnips and do exams in a hurryβ Itβs virtually the same.
27.11.2024 01:02 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Richard Nixon #thewrongshoes Yet this is before he knew they were wrong. He looks quite comfortable in them. He thinks he looks nice. He doesnβt yet know about board shoes.
27.11.2024 00:50 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I like how small, seemingly inconsequential moments can ripple into pivotal events. Take Richard Nixon wearing black dress shoes to the beach. A minor misstep (one Kennedy would never had made) that ushered in a paranoia culminating in Watergate. What if you wear the wrong shoes tomorrow. What then?
27.11.2024 00:47 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0