Journalists - if you're trying to determine the partisan fairness of new congressional districting plans, check out www.planscore.org.
05.08.2025 19:45 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0@chriswarshaw.bsky.social
Professor at Georgetown’s McCourt School of Public Policy. Focus on representation, elections, & public opinion. Co-Author: Dynamic Democracy, PlanScore.org, & TrueViews.org.
Journalists - if you're trying to determine the partisan fairness of new congressional districting plans, check out www.planscore.org.
05.08.2025 19:45 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0If we are really in a new era of extreme gerrymandering, it's pretty clear that the 2030 elections are likely to be the most important election of our lifetime. The 2026 elections are important for 2030 though for determining incumbency advantage and preventing more mid-decade redistricting.
05.08.2025 19:43 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Context for gerrymandering debate
“How responsive/congruent is state policy with state public opinion” is one of the most studied poli sci questions
Red & blue states both passed more 'extreme' policy in recent decades. Blue state policy shifts were aligned with state opinion. Red states’ weren’t
According to PlanScore, the new Texas congressional map would have a +17% pro-Republican efficiency gap, which is more skewed than 97% of congressional maps over the past 50 years. planscore.org/plan.html?20...
02.08.2025 03:26 — 👍 5 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0This is incredible public service journalism from @gelliottmorris.com and Strength In Numbers. Having a continually updated polling average of the generic congressional ballot—an important metric for understanding elections—is just invaluable. Support their work!
01.08.2025 15:39 — 👍 64 🔁 14 💬 0 📌 3This is really cool!
24.07.2025 01:31 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Here's a treat for state politics and policy researchers: Ethan Dee and I published a dataset in Nature: Scientific Data with the universe of state legislative bills since ~2009 coded by 28 policy areas. We used a machine learning model built off open source components.
22.07.2025 14:20 — 👍 25 🔁 10 💬 2 📌 2Super cool! Well deserved.
21.07.2025 21:42 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0From a new version of my idealstan working paper that I will be presenting at APSA.👇
I'm so proud of this not-so-little-anymore model. Vroom vroom vroom 🏎️. An order of magnitude faster than the competition (mcmcPACK).
MIT Political Science is hiring this fall, with junior lines in both American Politics (members.apsanet.org/CAREERS/eJob...) and IR. Please share widely!
15.07.2025 18:09 — 👍 69 🔁 73 💬 3 📌 3Good morning, election data nerds! Here's a Monday morning present for you: we've finished updating our county-level presidential election results dataset to include 2024. The full dataset (covering 2000-2024) is now available on our Dataverse: buff.ly/eUGYc1h
14.07.2025 14:15 — 👍 39 🔁 24 💬 3 📌 1This is really interesting. We just got back from a family safari trip to Kenya. Heard lots of dissatisfaction with the government. Fun to read deeper analysis of the politics. Also, excited to be colleagues!
12.07.2025 14:47 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0📢 Thrilled to share our new article introducing CampaignView—a comprehensive open-source dataset of congressional candidate campaign bios and policy platforms (2018–2022). Paper + data here: campaignview.org & doi.org/10.7910/DVN/... 🧵1/4
10.07.2025 17:02 — 👍 132 🔁 49 💬 7 📌 3No data yet
10.07.2025 00:46 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0yeah, exactly. both tabular results and shape files are useful, but shape files obviously crucial for redistricting, synchronizing data across levels of office, and visual analysis.
09.07.2025 21:00 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Very cool! It would be great to find a time to catch-up. Let's follow-up offline.
09.07.2025 20:59 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Interesting! I definitely view VEST as the gold standard here. I guess my hope was that the NYT data is accurate enough to serve as a placeholder until VEST and @mitelectionlab.bsky.social are able to produce national data.
09.07.2025 20:43 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0They have a data page that provides details when it's not from official sources.
09.07.2025 20:36 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0ah, got it. that makes sense. yeah, my sense is that's true in a lot of states -- very unclear linking ideas between tabular precinct results and shape files of the maps.
09.07.2025 20:35 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Interesting! I wonder why the NYT didn't incorporate those into their map. In any case, that's super useful for end-users that are looking to assemble nationwide data. Thanks for all your efforts on this!
09.07.2025 20:32 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The @nytimes.com just posted an updated version of their detailed map of the 2024 election results, with the data available for download. This is invaluable in part because funding constraints have slowed down academic efforts at releasing precinct-level results. www.nytimes.com/interactive/...
09.07.2025 20:28 — 👍 578 🔁 176 💬 54 📌 29Reality:
"The Republican budget bill, which now heads to Trump's desk, will be the most unpopular major law in at least 30 years"
www.gelliottmorris.com/p/one-big-un...
Gutting.
04.07.2025 16:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Personal update- I’m looking forward to starting new adventures this fall at Georgetown’s McCourt School of Public Policy (@mccourtschool.bsky.social). I’m grateful for 8 amazing years at GW. I’ll miss friends, colleagues, and students there, but fortunately I’m not moving too far.
03.07.2025 13:07 — 👍 29 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 04 polls out today on the GOP budget bill
Post-Ipsos: 23% support/42% oppose/34% no opin
KFF: 35% favorable/64% unfave
Pew: 29% favor/49% oppose/21% not sure
Economist/YouGov: 35%-51% support-oppose
www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
www.kff.org/medicaid/pol...
www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/...
Lots going on in the world and not saying this is the most important thing, but am I reading the Senate version of Trump's BBB correctly as imposing a substantially lower endowment tax than the House version? www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/do...
16.06.2025 21:20 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0These issue by issue approval ratings are very cool @gelliottmorris.com.
13.06.2025 17:10 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Overall, the special elections imply a large Democratic win in the 2025 NJ/VA elections and 2026 congressional elections. What'll happen in 2028? 🤷♂️
11.06.2025 02:27 — 👍 6 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0I've seen it argued that special elections aren't that predictive since Dem's did pretty well in special elections in 2024, and Republicans still won the popular vote in November. But it's worth noting that Dems are doing about 10% better (compared to 2020) in the specials this year than in 2024.
11.06.2025 02:27 — 👍 9 🔁 2 💬 2 📌 0But this doesn't really tell the whole story. As Trump's approval rating has dropped, the magnitude of Democratic over-performances has grown. In the specials since April 1, the median Democratic over-performance is 16.1%.
11.06.2025 02:27 — 👍 10 🔁 5 💬 2 📌 0