Oh he's trans masc, I just thought it was straight up a woman
19.04.2025 06:45 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0@arcinglight.bsky.social
Oh he's trans masc, I just thought it was straight up a woman
19.04.2025 06:45 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0No survival instinct at all. Just vibes... I like it.
17.04.2025 19:20 โ ๐ 8 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Ugh I might have to become a waiter at his table of success... he called an Italian caption Spanish and dedicated it to the victims of a nightclub collapse... I can't with this diva
17.04.2025 19:18 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Lol
I feel the need to defend myself, it was 11pm and I had just gotten back from work, I'm not usually this stupid I swear ๐ญ
Thank God
17.04.2025 17:41 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Oh my fucking god you got me so good, I thought that was real!
17.04.2025 17:40 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I may have been struck stupid because what on earth does that even mean
17.04.2025 17:29 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Who ended the holocaust?
17.04.2025 15:24 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Some Bush PR hack most likely
17.04.2025 14:47 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Chilling
17.04.2025 14:46 โ ๐ 10 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Him
17.04.2025 14:04 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Anyone with an MM40 Exocet Surface to Surface missile battery has the opportunity to do the funniest thing ever.
17.04.2025 14:02 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I haven't seen the list myself personally but I have been assured he is on it. You would not believe how a little tin of boot polish goes a long way in the canadian government.
17.04.2025 12:46 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Great question. Think about the nature of the US economy and what it's dependent on. I imagine your answer is the mid-90s. Everything after that has basically been one recession after the other. Dotcom, 2008, the scam economies of Crypto and NFTs since like 2018...
23.12.2024 19:03 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Dang that must've been a really deep cut
23.12.2024 17:16 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I don't know how this is a point of discussion relevant to the current thing being talked about and I'm not interested.
23.12.2024 17:12 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Just like Marxists, economists are convinced that if people just read theory and do homework, they'll somehow magically gain the consciousness needed to operate at the same level as them... Doesn't work that way. Material conditions matter more than anything else.
23.12.2024 17:05 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I am not, I can literally see his Twitter. Every time people brought up public sentiment his strat is to bring out a bitch of graphs and then say "abloo bloo bloo". He and MattYgelsias are in a contest to see who is worse at understanding reality. And MattY is winning at being worse.
23.12.2024 16:56 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Lol what are you gonna do about it, lose another election by historic levels?
23.12.2024 16:05 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Lol, you, a dipshit who thinks Kamala isn't a neoliberal, is gonna start lecturing others on it... Incredible.
23.12.2024 16:01 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Looks like you can't pick up on sarcasm. I am not curious about the methodology, I think the source is dogshit. Like citing the Daily Mail as a news source.
23.12.2024 14:10 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Lol looks like you genuinely don't understand that Pew is a highly biased source whose surveys can simply be discarded 80% of the time, which is a figure I pulled from the same place they pull their sampling from: where the sun don't shine.
23.12.2024 14:08 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Chief, you made the absurd claim about surveys somehow affecting public views of national economics, not me. Nut up or shut up. It's delusional to think anyone even knows the results of these surveys, since even you apparently charge money to wade through this bullshit.
23.12.2024 14:06 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0My guy this is pew. I asked for an actual survey.
23.12.2024 14:02 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Also I hope you know that we have the demographic data for the 2024 election which shows that republican voters didn't really shift their allegiances around. It was the democrats who failed to energise their base. The voters you claim impact economic metrics didn't really shift.
23.12.2024 14:01 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Please show me a poll where you think this happened. It seems fascinating that you would somehow cook up a theory like this.
23.12.2024 13:59 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0No this is a genuinely delusional take. Pollsters don't just talk to Republicans for fucks sake. There is literal stagflation, with sharp price spikes, and at the same time massive layoffs in the tech industry. You're talking about this as if it only exists in a single poll! Lunacy.
23.12.2024 13:58 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0What are you blabbing about? Do you think polls only talk to republican voters?!
23.12.2024 13:55 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0And your point being....???
23.12.2024 13:53 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0By every metric Willy Weenis presents, the average American should be cash rich and having a great time paying off rent or mortgages, yet that's not really materialised has it? There's a gulf in his model and reality. He's wrong about something important, somewhere.
23.12.2024 13:53 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0