These numbers areβ¦surprisingly higher than I would expect. This is potentially something not just worth doing but worth running on.
16.02.2026 21:40 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@notlikewe.bsky.social
Director of the Institute for Ending the Cherry-Picking and Misinterpreting of FRED Charts on Bluesky. βBad jokesβ - Sallah I do legal and business stuff.
These numbers areβ¦surprisingly higher than I would expect. This is potentially something not just worth doing but worth running on.
16.02.2026 21:40 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I think Pelosi understood this and Schumer and Jeffries either donβt or donβt have the fortitude to stand up to him.
16.02.2026 21:37 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0It has only been raining for ~4 hours, we havenβt had rain in about a month, and weβre supposed to get 4 straight days of heavy rain plus another 3-4 days of heavy rain likely next week.
16.02.2026 21:17 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Viva la Nithya
16.02.2026 21:13 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Theoretically that is possible but 1) the data donβt show that and 2) even if that were the case that would mean that capital is capturing that income and as was mentioned itβs the wealthy who benefit from gains to capital.
An even starker statistic: the top 1% own ~55% of all equities.
RIP Spurgeon Tanner
16.02.2026 19:24 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I didnβt dig into the details on AEI but best I can tell these arguments are trying to create some proprietary deflation measure that is a hybrid of ECI/PPI and CPI to account for a number of things including total compensation. So theyβre trying to put the burden of rising HC costs onto labor.
16.02.2026 18:04 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0And bicycle delivery guys donβt clog up the sidewalks or terrify my dog.
16.02.2026 17:58 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0βIf you measure something other than wages the wage-productivity gap disappears!β
You are not a serious person.
Hereβs the St Louis Fed using two different price measures:
fredblog.stlouisfed.org/2023/03/when...
And hereβs the BLS:
www.bls.gov/opub/btn/vol...
And hereβs CEPR:
The roving camera aspect is the worst (LAPD has used them to find suspects before), but yes they do clog up sidewalks and scare my dog so they can get fucked.
Also how do these improve my experience as a consumer? Itβs a worse experience.
This is flatly incorrect.
16.02.2026 17:10 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Hey Hilary: it doesnβt matter what you think because itβs none of your fucking business what a kid, their parents and their doctors want to do.
16.02.2026 17:09 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0My argument is that people have been suffering for decades so calling it a βvibecessionβ (or attributing it to personal failings) misses the bigger picture of why people feel the way they do. Itβs not about consumer behavior itβs about being left behind in the broader economy for a long time.
16.02.2026 17:06 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The trendline shows that people didnβt suddenly just become treatlerites during/post Covid. You canβt analyze the vibecession without looking back at least to either 1973/5, 1989 or 2000. People didnβt recover pre-2000 wage levels until the mid-2010βs.
16.02.2026 16:56 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0In 2018 it was 1/3 what it was in 1975. That is the same period over which the stagnation of real median wages was most acute.
16.02.2026 16:49 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0For reference, from BLS a decade ago:
16.02.2026 16:41 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Evergreen
16.02.2026 16:40 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0That might be a credible argument if personal savings rates didnβt follow the same track as wages over the exact same time period. Unlikely that people just happened to become more financially irresponsible at the same time wages began to stagnate.
16.02.2026 16:38 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0βIs now really a good time to fight for human rights?β
ffs
Again, are you really trying to challenge the premise that productivity and wages began to diverge in 1975?
16.02.2026 15:57 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0When Eric Edelman and Eliot Cohen are taking about the national security implications of the Epstein files and the possibility that it is all part of a Russian op I think itβs fair to say that theory is very much out of the conspiracy realm.
16.02.2026 15:14 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The Democratic Party being one of the βmost visible pro-trans parties on earthβ is one of those things that sounds nice but also reveals you know nothing about geopolitics.
16.02.2026 14:25 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Iβve been seeing sporadic discussion to open 2026 of how βthe economy is more resilient than we thoughtβ and my response has been βyou remember how companies were front loading imports into July last year? Just waitβ and I believe I will be vindicated in that view.
16.02.2026 14:18 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0what
16.02.2026 04:21 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The corrected chart shows the same thing just to a slightly lesser degree.
Are you really trying to challenge the premise that productivity and wages began to diverge in 1975?
When controlled for as stated in the OP they are. And as I stated in my follow up when you donβt they have only beat inflation by ~.6% annually which is not βgetting aheadβ in any meaningful sense considering productivity gains over the past fifty years.
16.02.2026 02:51 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Even when you donβt control for those things real median wages have beat inflation by ~.6% annually since 1973.
That means *at the median* it would take ten years move from a 1br to a 2br if that was your only QoL improvement.
Median real wages are flat since 1973 and almost all gains that exist came from a bump during Covid which has now flipped to decline.
More representative figures like share of total income and share of total wealth they are all down except the top deciles since 1989.
He likes to look at the median and ignore what happens below it.
16.02.2026 02:34 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0