Clinton was a trash candidate and we shouldn't be afraid to say so
01.11.2025 00:09 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@brawnvivant.bsky.social
Clinton was a trash candidate and we shouldn't be afraid to say so
01.11.2025 00:09 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Not bad, Jamie.
30.10.2025 21:54 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0He's still an anchor, right? Did he move to opinion and I just missed it? Conservative commentator Jake Tapper vibes.
30.10.2025 21:53 โ ๐ 6 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Everyone needs to balance hobbies and personal enrichment with making time for a potential partner, yes.
30.10.2025 21:43 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Sure we can joke about that and that may the where the biggest change is but it's definitely not true that women *as a whole* aren't impressed. Some love it, some love the strength aspect, and a bunch of others I'm sure don't care or are actively turned off.
30.10.2025 18:59 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0No there isn't you moronic quisling fucks
30.10.2025 17:57 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Who's "we"? I've seen a ton of screenshots from lots of people so you're kinda late to the game here if anything.
30.10.2025 17:39 โ ๐ 15 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Yes, the time thing. Edibles usuallymake me the stupid kind of high much more than the fun kind of high. Time stretches on and also I can't follow things minute to minute.
30.10.2025 03:46 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Who campaigned on prison abolition? Who's the highest ranking democrat you can name who's ever even mentioned prison abolition?
29.10.2025 22:06 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0"Harris would have done nothing differently"
29.10.2025 20:47 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Chicken pot pie
29.10.2025 20:40 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Dumpling-adjacent. Dumpling vibes. Spiritually dumpling-esque.
29.10.2025 20:00 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Like that shape-based food chart I'm going to assert that soup in a bread bowl is, in fact, technically a dumpling. Maybe only if you put the little cap back on first idk.
29.10.2025 20:00 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0It's far easier to just redistribute all property and run a centrally planned economy. This wouldn't be taxation per se because there'd be no money. Duh.
29.10.2025 19:48 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0How is it not disqualifying?? People who know him have said he knew it was a Totenkopf. It's even clear in his reddit history. We cannot have a guy who was chill with having a Nazi tattoo for decades be the Democratic nominee for a key Senate pickup opportunity.
29.10.2025 15:23 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Is one side calling him a Nazi or are they saying "hey, a guy who's had a well-known Nazi tattoo for 20 years at the very best has poor judgment and shouldn't the nominee of the anti-Nazi party"?
29.10.2025 15:15 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Is it just me or does he somehow seem like a three dimensional cardboard cutout of himself in this pic?
29.10.2025 14:44 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Absolutely cursed Yes Yes No episode
29.10.2025 01:15 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Or the actual president bragging for the tenth time about his dementia assessment
29.10.2025 01:07 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I know all of this is unbelievable but like the fact that he's been bragging about his Montreal cognitive test results since like 2018 really should be the subject of constant scrutiny from any kind of self respecting mainstream media, right?
28.10.2025 03:13 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Really just ignoring the thread context here. No one is writing anyone off.
26.10.2025 15:24 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Ah, but that's just the viewers, Matt, not the *real* fans...
24.10.2025 22:16 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0The thing being critiqued is politics and it's not "finished".
24.10.2025 20:48 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Ah, that makes sense. Thanks!
24.10.2025 19:08 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Wait, the classic only has two speeds? No wonder. Rechargeable has four and the lowest is pretty low imo.
24.10.2025 19:07 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0... not the same how? ๐โ๏ธ
(I recently bought the waterproof cordless but I guess I can learn how to regret my choice)
Apparently they're as loose with their definition of backflip as they are their rules against premarital sex
24.10.2025 18:42 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0He opposed ending the filibuster until like summer 2020 also!
24.10.2025 18:41 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Why do we need more engineers when they have 12 people total at <company with a product that's superficially similar but has orders of magnitude simpler technical requirements>?
(no that last one isn't oddly specific why do you ask)
Even at a software company it can be difficult to get senior leadership to fully appreciate technical work. Why can't we just start building <horrendously complex thing> already? Why do we need a team of X to maintain Y?
24.10.2025 18:02 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0