Flow Void

Well the missing sections have been restored. Another win against fascism.

The website has more than just the text of the Constitution, it also allows you to search for historical background and judicial interpretation for each section. That much requires coding.

Training an AI is a lot more intensive than querying an AI, so it's possible the developers need powerful chips but users only need a phone.

More like "Dems in this RI"

"If Democrats want to win, first they need to start losing"

"Consistent massive wins by Democrats in 2025 is a sure recipe for complacency in 2026 - and crushing defeat"

Anti-trans people were never going to vote for Harris either.

And there are plenty of people who are misinformed about vaccines and primed on the subject by Republicans. That doesn't mean Harris should have made it a major part of her campaign.

She did say it, in her platform.

You are arguing that she should have made trans rights a more prominent part of her campaign. She chose a couple of other centerpiece issues instead. That doesn't means she hates trans people.

The campaign platform is the most comprehensive description of a candidate's position. I don't see why an informed voter should prefer a sound bite.

Her platform is also pro-vax, though she rarely if ever discussed it on the campaign trail. Would you thus conclude that she "hates vaccines"?

Senate Democrats block GOP-led bill to ban transgender athletes from women's sports Republicans are trying to keep the national spotlight on the issue after Trump and some of the party's down-ballot candidates ran on it in the 2024 election.

Democrats have materially defended their trans policy.

www.nbcnews.com/politics/con...

If you couldn't even be bothered to read the Democratic platform, how else can that be interpreted but disinterest in trans people?

That would just force state employees to pay estimated taxes.

The 2024 primary had four candidates: Joe Biden, Marianne Williamson, Dean Phillips, and Jason Palmer.

We should run whoever manages to win the primary. And whoever that is likely won't be for all of the same things that you are for or that I am for.

No, Trump would have lost if only his base had voted for him. He most certainly needed to win over Biden 2020 voters and new voters.

And yet Dems won in 1992, 1996, 2008, 2012, and 2020...

She was pro-choice too. Does that mean we should try something different in 2028?

Governors control a hierarchical bureaucracy. Legislators must cooperate to succeed. Very different incentives.

This weekend Senators voted "To require a report on New World screwworm readiness and response" and "To allocate amounts for the Intimate Partner Violence Assistance Program." One was written by a GOP, one by a Dem.

Both passed unanimously. Which one should Dems have obstructed?

Not to mention that there are plenty of things Senate Dems and Reps still agree on! Are Dems supposed to "maximally obstruct" them before voting in favor.

Denying unanimous consent on innocuous items (like naming clinics, below) or items with bipartisan support (like new privacy regulations, below) won't chew up time. Those kinds of items will simply no longer be brought to vote.

How would such an outcome be a win for Democrats?

Do you have any data that show those things were a mistake? Or are you just extrapolating your personal reaction to the rest of America?

The grass is gone, but at least the rose bushes are still there

Some quotes from the article for the ‘DO SOMETHING!’s. 👇

She has already done more to try to stop Trump than nearly everyone else who claims to care. She doesn't have to prove anything to anyone.

Harris is not our VP anymore

Not news, but still satisfying

Great, then we should expect to hear from Harris in a few years after she finds a new cause to inspire her.

Biden won his election.

When was the last time you heard from Al Gore?

And now her job is done