Q&A: How China’s ‘two new’ policy aims to help cut emissions | @wanyuansong.bsky.social #CBarchive
Read here: bit.ly/4bFT5Wd
@sandholt.bsky.social
Q&A: How China’s ‘two new’ policy aims to help cut emissions | @wanyuansong.bsky.social #CBarchive
Read here: bit.ly/4bFT5Wd
NEW – Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop | Qi Qin @laurimyllyvirta.bsky.social
Read here: buff.ly/0KFqDho
Extreme rainfall, 300GW of solar and Industrial Cthulhu 🦑
That's a snapshot of China's climate developments over the past fortnight. Plus, new research on 2035 power sector targets in China's upcoming NDC
Read my new @carbonbrief.org China Briefing for more ⬇️
www.carbonbrief.org/china-briefi...
NEW: As 🇨🇳 faces extreme floods and drought, I unpack its new climate adaptation progress report for today's @carbonbrief.org China Briefing
Plus:
🎯 Clean-power targets set for new sectors
🪭 Air-con drives record high power load
❌ Solar firms get overcapacity telling-off
Read more ⬇️
Really good summary of the Spain blackouts report here from @jkempenergy.bsky.social – the clearest I've seen
jkempenergy.com/2025/06/19/s...
Subscribe to Carbon Brief’s 🇨🇳 China Briefing newsletter for:
➤Key developments in China's energy sector
➤Latest climate news
➤Context behind the headlines
➤In-depth analysis
➤Interesting new science
➤Recommended reading
Sign up here for free ⬇️
bit.ly/3Q2StB4
China Briefing | Solar exports; Carbon market expansion; Leaders’ climate commitments
✍️ @anikanpatel.carbonbrief.org
Read here ➡️ buff.ly/nsqY4h9
Trump has announced tariffs on 213 countries but left out Russia "because U.S. sanctions already preclude any meaningful trade". Yet there are only 61 countries in the world that export more to the U.S. than Russia. Not really a shocker but the math isn't mathing.
03.04.2025 04:56 — 👍 68 🔁 16 💬 1 📌 3Recommended listen: Kaare @sandholt.bsky.social of top Chinese thinktank the Energy Research Institute talked about the country’s energy transformation outlook – recently covered by Carbon Brief – on the Environment China podcast.
29.03.2025 14:49 — 👍 12 🔁 4 💬 0 📌 0Great overview. You could add “dual circulation” to the list 😊
28.03.2025 05:38 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0🇨🇳 emphasised the “two new” (两新) at “two sessions” for boosting consumption.
The policy was first announced in 2023, but was heavily promoted in 2024 and updated in 2025. It covers 4 aspects:
- Equipment updates
- Trade-in
- Recycling
- Improving standards for product efficiency and emissions.
🧵
Plus smart meters allowing for charging when the electricity prices are low, and a quick build up of charging infrastructure.
16.03.2025 06:06 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0EDF's flagship new nuclear power station in Flamanville - whose opening was delayed by 12 years - has been down for 76 of its first 100 days. I sincerely hope it eventually becomes a workhorse of Europe's power system - but don't let anyone tell you nuclear is easy.
reporterre.net/Nucleaire-l-...
Experts: What to expect from China on energy and climate action in 2025? | @anikanpatel.carbonbrief.org w/comment from @kyleichan.bsky.social @ilariamazzocco.bsky.social Angel Hsu, Christoph Nedopil, Muyi Yang, Shuang Liu, Lin Boqiang, Chen Zhibin, Yao Zhe
Read here: buff.ly/4gL5EkF
🇨🇳 said it was "concerned over the US’s announcement of withdrawal from the Paris Agreement...China will work with all parties to actively address the climate challenge and promote a global green and low-carbon transition for the shared future of humanity".
www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xw/fyrbt...
Just out: Solar power additions in China in 2024 exceeded expectations, again, with a whopping 277 GW installed in just one year! This was up 28% on the already towering 217 GW added in 2023.
Wind power made a new record as well, with 79 GW added to the grid, up 5% on year.
HOT OFF THE PRESS: Denmark is the world's district heating leader. By 2035 district heating is expected to cover 65% of all buildings.
Our new @regassistproj.bsky.social report led by @soxenaar.bsky.social on what the world can learn from the Danish experience.👇
www.raponline.org/knowledge-ce...
Ingen tvivl om det men nok sværere at gøre noget ved med hans yndlingsvåben tariffer.
21.01.2025 06:26 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Hvor stor var bileksporten fra Kina til USA i 2024?
21.01.2025 05:52 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Kia bliver det første mærke i Danmark til at stoppe benzinsalg 🚗🔌
Volvo er på en lignende kurs, men sælger stadig to plugin-hybrider i Danmark.
“Det handler om at levere det, kunderne gerne vil have, og langt, langt de fleste efterspørger elbiler” siger Kia-direktøren.
Det er jo interessant. Hvilken periode dækker oversigten?
08.01.2025 10:29 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0China issued a guideline for building a “national unified market”. Chapter 5 details "building a unified national energy market system".
In general, local govs'll lose powers on implementing preferential investment policies for finance, tax, prices, land, resources.
news.bjx.com.cn/html/2025010...
Nå så er det jo lige før vi er enige. Du ser volatilitet som et problem her og nu, jeg ser volatilitet som en del af løsningen på etableringen af fremtidens energisystem. På sigt bliver volatiliteten mindre dog nok aldrig fuldstændig jævn. Fokuser på markedskontrol og incitamenter til fleksibilitet
07.01.2025 12:35 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Og er du med på, at investeringerne i lagring skal drives af prisforskelle på elprisen, eller har du andre forslag til at gøre investeringen rentabel?
07.01.2025 11:47 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Nej. Vilde priser er skadelige, markedsmagt er skadeligt, men at elprisen afspejler forholdet mellem udbud og efterspørgsel time for time er ikke skadeligt. Og det er ikke et spørgsmål om teknologiudvikling, men om incitamenter. Teknologierne til at håndtere fleksibilitet findes allerede.
07.01.2025 11:45 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Lad os blive konkrete her: elektricitet fra sol og vind er notorisk de billigeste former for elproduktion, og de bliver kun billigere i fremtiden. Men de giver i udgangspunktet mere volatile elpriser. Derfor er der en sammenhæng mellem prisniveau og volatilitet.
07.01.2025 11:40 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Det er uomtvisteligt. Det er heller ikke det vi diskuterer. Vi diskutere om volatilitet som sådant er skadeligt, eller om det er nødvendigt for at fremme fleksible løsninger. Hvis du ikke har prisforskelle som afspejler udbud og efterspørgsel på el, hvordan vil du fremme investeringer i batterier?
07.01.2025 11:32 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Så du mener at høje stabile priser er bedre end lave priser med en vis volatilitet? Jeg vil hellere have en lav årlig elregning end en høj. Igen, alt andet lige vil højere volatilitet give dyrere fastprisaftaler. Men alt andet er ikke lige når vi ser på fremtidens elsystem.
07.01.2025 11:28 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Du overser at prisforskelle driver udviklingen af løsninger som modvirker vilde prisudsving. Det skal kunne betale sig at investere i lagring eller varmepumper men når de er installeret i systemet medvirker de til prisstabilitet. Du kan blot ikke forvent det sker fra den ene dag til den anden.
07.01.2025 11:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Som jeg skriver, det gælder ved en alt andet lige betragtning. Men hvis et system der giver volatile elpriser er væsentligt billigere end et system med stabile priser, så er det da bedre med volatile priser som kan håndteres i et marked med feks fastprisaftaler.
07.01.2025 11:12 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0