Gavin's Avatar

Gavin

@8rx.bsky.social

113 Followers  |  87 Following  |  144 Posts  |  Joined: 11.11.2024  |  1.8544

Latest posts by 8rx.bsky.social on Bluesky

I feel so bad for those poor air traffic controllers

05.11.2025 22:05 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Until 50% alive are above 60 years old

01.11.2025 22:52 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Who is it that is alleging they were drug traffickers? It certainly wasn't a court of law

28.10.2025 17:10 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I want an executable file man

27.09.2025 15:17 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Lmao pretty accurate and fair though. Should've included Startpage too

25.09.2025 18:48 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Seems pretty sane to me

23.09.2025 23:20 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

No, he just would've added scrutiny to the merger

23.09.2025 06:54 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

At least it's not the US

22.09.2025 15:15 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I think you are saying things that you want me to think, not what I actually think. I don't think you want a substantive or productive conversation so I'm gonna end it here

21.09.2025 18:39 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

"A completely unqualified, inexperienced hack. But she has great hair. Did she have to let Trump grab her by the pussy to get the nomination?"

What about this is directed at trump?

I just think the way we talk about current events is important, And frankly I disagree that it's a losing battle

21.09.2025 18:24 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I mean I tend to believe that yes, this woman is more than likely unqualified, but if your going to critique someone, do it on their merits instead of stooping to MAGA's level

21.09.2025 18:04 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Not to be that guy, but what makes this post any different from the people saying Kamala slept her way into being VP

21.09.2025 16:52 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Bro's like "have you seen how much autism rates have gone up" and then decides to stop measuring autism rates

21.09.2025 15:01 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I literally just watched a west wing episode abt this shit, you would thing we would have learned something 20 years later

18.09.2025 18:55 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Anyone ever watched gattaca?

18.09.2025 15:18 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Surely this won't cause inflation

17.09.2025 18:27 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

If any one of these headlines could've been time traveled to before the election, the GOP would've immediately denied it and called the left conspiracy theorists. Now they just say it outright

16.09.2025 15:22 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This looks great

13.09.2025 20:39 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

To answer your question,
Yes

11.09.2025 17:55 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

You see that big purple chunk pre-2011? Even if Germany built no new nuclear reactors after fukushima, and had just kept what it had, that would generate as much energy as Germany gets from burning coal today. Here's the full graph btw, you'll see that for decades nuclear was a clean power supply

08.09.2025 17:48 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

New reactors are certainly less competitive than other energy offerings like wind and solar, but old reactors that haven't reached expiration are very cheap to operate

08.09.2025 16:50 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

All countries subsidize there energy sectors as it's a strategic way to gain energy independence, but even then Germany spends $10 billion more than France does

08.09.2025 16:48 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

The "right thing" has resulted in expensive energy and dependence on Russian oil. Every day you can go and look at the difference between the countries that kept nuclear, and those that got rid of it. Germany is behind on energy because of this
app.electricitymaps.com/map/72h/hourly

06.09.2025 00:42 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

The better time to decommission nuclear would've been when they were set to expire, they are in fact losing out on money that could've been created from keeping these plants alive. Renewables being expensive at the time is all the more reason why the CDU shouldn't have folded to public pressure

06.09.2025 00:24 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

But nuclear is still cheaper than coal, so why would Germany phase out nuclear if they then increased the burning of coal for energy?

06.09.2025 00:11 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Nuclear is only more expensive for NEW projects, maintaining older reactors with pre-existing infrastructure is very economical. And irregardless of renewables, there's a real discussion to be had about the effects of decommissioning nuclear. France's energy is half the cost for a reason

05.09.2025 23:00 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

You brought up wanting to phase out coal, I'm saying that phasing out nuclear does the opposite of phasing out coal. This happens from an increase in the price of energy, which therefore creates an incentive for people to burn coal.

05.09.2025 22:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I'm of the opinion that decommissioning nuclear energy and phasing out coal are two opposing ideas. When you phase out nuclear, you increase the demand for energy relative to supply, increasing to incentive for burning coal. If you want to call me a liar again, tell me what it is I'm lying about

05.09.2025 22:28 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

You're attacking me, not my argument

05.09.2025 21:42 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

That's not what I'm saying. After Germany decommissioned nuclear, they started burning more coal to make up for the energy deficit, which is both more expensive and more deadly. Any situation where you find yourself decommissioning nuclear to burn coal is absurd

05.09.2025 21:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

@8rx is following 20 prominent accounts