Glad to see that I beat President Trump to being awarded Freedom of the City of London. Can't wait to see him shepherd his sheep over London Bridge www.cityam.com/president-do...
05.08.2025 08:43 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@nickbowes.bsky.social
Northerner in SE London Politics. Football. Cats. Tinned Red Salmon. Baking. Accordion. Travel. Alan Partridge. HP Sauce. Gardening. Vintage shops. Yorkshire Tea. Let’s disagree but do so politely and with humour
Glad to see that I beat President Trump to being awarded Freedom of the City of London. Can't wait to see him shepherd his sheep over London Bridge www.cityam.com/president-do...
05.08.2025 08:43 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0YouGov on it today with the big issues of our time -
DO YOU LIKE OR DISLIKE THE SMELL OF PETROL?
3/ Given the near-wipeout of the Tories just over the border in Kent at May's local elections, this will be a by-election result that sends the shivers down the spine of the Bromley conservatives with May 2026's all out elections fast approaching. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Ke...
25.07.2025 08:56 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 02/ In 2022, Labour came second in this ward. At the General Election, the Tories held on to the Bromley & Biggin Hill constituency (which includes this ward) by just 302 votes over Labour. Reform were third, but did get over 8,000 votes. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bromley...
25.07.2025 08:56 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 01/ Overnight London by-election result 🚨Reform win a seat from the Tories in Bromley - the shape of things to come in outer London boroughs at next May's local elections? #byelection #London #Bromley
25.07.2025 08:56 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The racist right hate London because it defies their portrayal of diversity as bad. And @london.gov.uk is the embodiment of that diversity - a football mad, liberal, inclusive, multi-faith Mayor who happens to be Muslim. How frustrating to racists who make out all Muslims hate our values & culture
28.06.2025 03:27 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0In the same spirit (but better than mine!) here’s @iandunt.bsky.social’s take down of brainwashed Goodwin’s piece on London iandunt.substack.com/p/they-hate-...
28.06.2025 03:17 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0A bit of London boosterism from me in this week's
@thisislca.bsky.social LDN Newsletter. Don't forget to sign up (link at the end) to receive LDN direct to your inbox every week - the indispensable guide to London's politics & public policy news that matters for the built environment...and more!
More evidence, if needed, that the @greenparty.org.uk is now the progressive alternative for disgruntled @teamlabouruk.bsky.social voters in inner London. Next May’s local elections in London have all the ingredients of a bloody night for Labour
27.06.2025 06:23 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0RIP Lalo Schifrin. So many cool scores and themes but nothing beats the combo of his music, the throaty roar of a Mustang and the San Francisco backdrop. Ladies & gents I give you the coolest car chase in movie history #Bullitt #LaloSchifrin
27.06.2025 06:15 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0How to lose political support and alienate people - Exhibit #1
26.06.2025 04:37 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0He shouldn’t have taken a peerage AND do this job. He needs to pick one or the other. I’ve worked in/around this world for a few years now, and ‘external affairs’ includes advocacy and influencing of decision-makers despite what ACOBA might say. It’s wrong to be a legislator and a lobbyist.
25.06.2025 05:41 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Oh man. Looks like London AND New York will have Muslim mayors soon. I cannot imagine how frenzied some on the right will be at this prospect. Cue lots of “New York is fallen…” etc etc blah blah
25.06.2025 05:26 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0And the Telegraph would have hated Virginia and the Bloomsbury Group. Liberal decadence and votes for women hardly the Telegraph’s thing back in the 1920s and 1930s. I imagine the Bloomsbury Group would have felt very at home in a liberal, tolerant, diverse modern London.
22.06.2025 12:11 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Amazing to think that she *would* have recognised it right up to 4 May 2016 though
22.06.2025 11:09 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0🚨 Batshit Telegraph headline of the day 🚨 ‘Woman dead for nearly 100 years wouldn’t recognise today’s London’ shocker
22.06.2025 11:06 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Of course, there won't be any meaningful reform of Council Tax, perhaps the most broken of all taxes. Instead, the Government will place more burden on it, stretching it to breaking point. Oh, and look! A quote from IPPR North - we know what that is code for... www.gov.uk/government/n...
20.06.2025 12:13 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Pity. They'd have made a big difference in Pawtcullis House www.standard.co.uk/news/politic...
20.06.2025 11:40 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0With Heathrow expansion so controversial, I suspect quite a few Londoners - given the choice - would have preferred the Chancellor to show her backing for London by backing the Bakerloo Line Extension or DLR to Thamesmead.
11.06.2025 16:50 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0And the Chancellor saying "backing London by backing a third runway" felt unnecessary. It might look clever written down on paper, but it will annoy the Mayor, London Labour MPs & council leaders. Plus, Rachel Reeves quote will be plastered across next May's Green & Lib Dem local election leaflets!
11.06.2025 16:50 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Much to say about the Spending Review, but first - when did a third runway at Heathrow and completing HS2 to Euston become "London" projects? Rather cheeky spin by the Government in my opinion
11.06.2025 16:50 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Every political activist is with you, @anneliesemidgleymp.bsky.social 💪🏼✉️📮
11.06.2025 07:19 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Charles is of course right. The Government can kiss goodbye to getting anywhere near the new housing target they're setting London if the rumours about what is (or, more importantly, isn't) in the Spending Review for London.
10.06.2025 12:56 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Besides, TfL could borrow more - it has a credit rating better than just about any public authority. But the Treasury won't allow it. This is despite London's 25 year success story of capacity improvements to public transport more than paying for themselves. Rant over!
10.06.2025 08:10 — 👍 7 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Instead, the risk is we end up with decaying trains, more infrastructure failures, an end to the sustained investment of the last 25 years. The Bakerloo Line trains are already the oldest trains in regular passenger service in Britain (from 1973) - even older than me.
10.06.2025 08:10 — 👍 6 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0It is mad that a city the size of London has to go cap in hand to the Government for £1bn to extend for a few miles the DLR. London (and all regions) should be able to raise and retain more of its own taxes and decide how it invests.
10.06.2025 08:10 — 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 1While the Government clearly see this as a political strategy, they are also being played by the Treasury. Government's change, but the Treasury stays in charge. Divide and rule is their aim - let the regions fight out over slices of the pie. A distraction from bigger things like devolution
10.06.2025 08:10 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I can imagine that if South Yorkshire Mayor Oliver Coppard was unhappy at the CSR, only to be told by the Government to pipe down as Manchester Airport is investing in new terminals/airports, he wouldn't be too happy.
10.06.2025 08:10 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0And apparently HS2 is now a London project. Yeah, thanks for that. While the Government might have greenlit the tunnelling from Old Oak Common, there's no solution to the wider Euston station challenge. Without sorting that, the whole line is chopped off at the knees, affecting way more than London
10.06.2025 08:10 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Also - while based on no evidence whatsoever - I suspect that most Londoners, if forced to choose, would go for new tube lines and upgrades ahead of airport expansion.
10.06.2025 08:10 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0