Rep. Geoff Smith

Just hang a giant Union flag over the statue.

Tiny baby leaning against giant floof

she happ. He floof.

The side eye glare is strong with this one.

Look, I get what he is TRYING to say, but Miller isn't the template. What we don't have anymore is a McConnell. And we haven't since Harry Reid passed.

The Dems just don't have a Neo-Nazi loser, and that's a problem.

Sure, but unless there is a duplicate of that post from this year, the context of it is incorrect.

I wouldn't go that far.

Not sure there’s a better endorsement of Zohran’s politics than a random guy from another country thinking he should be able to meet with Zohran on demand because he is wealthy

Late Stage Capitalist decline, clearly.

Reminds me of how my boss wants interval level data on a daily basis and I have to constantly remind him that until the data is properly correlated, anything we read into it is subject to change.

I mean, that was 5 years ago. Kind of a lot has happened since then.

Maybe I'm just too thick/ dense on this subject, but it all sounds like "be a good parent" to me. Tying it to a more specific social concept ("lonely young men") feels like an attempt to reach a conclusion than a natural extension.

Congrats!

Critical thinking not your forte , it seems.

*votes Yes on H.R. 4 calling on the people of New Hampshire to pet kittens and puppies*

Well thought out, devastating reply. I'm in awe, sir.

Leave pointless recognition announcements to the professionals like us politicians, please.

I would be more convinced by this "Dems need to talk about this being to get laid" stuff seriously if someone could convince me that what these dudes want to hear is sound advice for romantic relationships and not "wanting to get laid".

But I'm not gonna hold my breath.

Democrats have lost young men. 37 of them, specifically, in the woods outside of Muskegon. They are all presumed dead.

I'm sure they miss him.

Would explain why you're living in a world where Unleash Chiang is still a thing.

A whole new meaning to the Allegory of the Cave.

Kinda like how it is easy to blame the numbers person when the numbers aren't good for you.

Sadly yes

Oh I was in agreement with him. I wanted the thread to be a thread of great goal loving, not whinging about what is better.

To go along with the first post.... imagine explaining to a CCP apparatchik from the 70s the US invading them in a joint operation with a unified Vietnam.

Yeah, this. All the normal hallmarks of manipulated/ cherry picked data.

Did you fall out of a time machine from the 1950s?

Why even invade? Just bomb them and be done with it. Unless they got oil or something, we aren't invading nothing.

"Unleash Chiang" was a super real threat, bro.