goob

Then go to Threads and hang out with your fellow AI losers and the plethora of Brands™️ that make up its userbase

It didn't look up anything.

"To me the issue is precariousness--how likely a single or couple of unexpected expensed puts a family at risk."

That is 100% a valid worry and concern. But it's not poverty, which has a well-defined meaning.

Her crocodile tears are so big, they have their own mini crocodile tears hanging off them.

The parents are reprehensible, but the kids aren't far off since they haven't gone no-contact with these fucking loosers yet.

Hahahaha damn you're stupid

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight there with ya, mate. It's infuriating!

Again, it's not that Green's point is inherently wrong, but instead that his methodology is completely flawed and he also doesn't show his sources for some of his key claims.

It's cool that we disagree though. Thanks for the conversation and have a great rest of your Thanksgiving!

Yeah, the difference in defining poverty seems to be the real kicker. Becker uses the defined term that we've used for decades while Green uses fuzzy math to reach a "vibey" term of poverty.

We're gonna need a truth and reconciliation commission and Nuremberg style trials to reckon with all of this evil, and any Dem candidate for office who shies away from a full reckoning in the name of "moving forward as a nation" can get well and truly fucked

Replying to @Nathan Gathright #greenscreen I think that this article is absurd TikTok video by divasunglasses

Here's an explainer on how his methodology is extremely flawed.

www.tiktok.com/@divasunglas...

Replying to @Nathan Gathright #greenscreen I think that this article is absurd TikTok video by divasunglasses

Here's an explainer on how his methodology is extremely flawed.

www.tiktok.com/@divasunglas...

Replying to @Nathan Gathright #greenscreen I think that this article is absurd TikTok video by divasunglasses

I've been sharing this link lately where @cnbecker14.bsky.social explains how his methodology is extremely flawed.

www.tiktok.com/@divasunglas...

Lots of people sharing this clip because it's funny and cathartic but I also genuinely believe it's important.

We have to win the narrative battle between "I live in a corrupt society and that's just how it is" and "I live in a corrupt society and we are going to defeat and humiliate these ghouls."

thanks internet stranger friend! 🫂

Upon learning how much I hated quiche, my sister LOVED to "bait" me into ranting against it. After she passed, I found audio on her computer where she secretly recorded me b/c she found it so funny.

Ugh, I miss her so dang much! Thanks to Maura for helping me relive these happy memories tonight.

Haha right on - I'm in the same boat. I saw the screenshot and got curious, so I looked up the account.

GOMS!

That's a parody account, FWIW

I rewatched it for the first time after Andor ended and was blown away by how bad it was compared to both my memory of it and the show it spawned.

"basically a chop job" is the perfect way to put it.

yOu’rE On hErE EnGaGiNg iN AnTiSeMiTiSm oN A ReGuLaR BaSiS

It is mistaken to assume anybody is uninfluenced by regular exposure to propaganda or disinformation.

"they don't have a 5th starter."

Uh...huh? News to me! 😅

MARK APPALACHIA SANFORD?!

These two morons squawking incorrectly at each other is amazing. It's like watching my two cats debate astrophysics by licking their assholes.

These two morons squawking incorrectly at each other is amazing. It's like watching my two cats debate astrophysics by licking their assholes.

Me, this morning, when people want to say anything critical about the Mariners re-signing Josh Naylor extension. I’m sorry, I can’t hear you over this sick music.

I gotta hear the case for Gio!

Ahhhhhhhhhhhh!!!

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!

On the flip side, if you take a hypothetical state that's 65% red - 35% blue and you voter suppress enough that the state government is 95% red, then you get a vastly different outcome of laws than if it was only 65% red.

undrstanding?