@benorr.bsky.social
PhD Candidate, UCSF Biophysics, Kortemme Lab Computational Biology & AI Lead, Animate Bio ML for Protein Design
Deep learning methods for protein structure prediction and design produce idealized structures. Finetuning on a set of physics-based de novo proteins improves their geometric diversity and generalization capabilities.
@benorr.bsky.social @kortemmelab.bsky.social
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
Model weights have been uploaded to zenodo. Fine-tuning and analysis code to be released soon. Work by @benorr.bsky.social, Stephanie Crilly, @dakpinaroglu.bsky.social, Eleanor Zhu, Michael Keiser, and Tanja Kortemme. (9/9) zenodo.org/records/1558...
10.06.2025 18:27 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0This work highlights how augmenting existing models with informative experimental data, as presented here, could expand our exploration of designable protein space and ultimately enable more challenging design problems to be addressed than currently possible. (8/9)
10.06.2025 18:27 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Fine-tuning AF2 on the stable sequences’ Rosetta models improves predictions for geometrically diverse proteins across 5 protein folds. Fine-tuning on ~6k stable designs leads to better performance than fine-tuning on all 10k stable+unstable designs. (7/9)
10.06.2025 18:27 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Frame2seq [@dakpinaroglu.bsky.social 2023] scores higher sequence-structure compatibility for the Rosetta models than the AF2 predictions for these stable designs, suggesting that the Rosetta models are more accurate structures than the AF2 predictions for these sequences. (6/9)
10.06.2025 18:27 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
We extended this analysis to 10k diverse Rossmann fold proteins generated by LUCS and tested for stability using yeast display [@grocklin.bsky.social 2017]. For ~6k stable designs, AF2, AF3, and ESMFold all demonstrate a strong bias toward predicting more “idealized” helix geometries. (5/9)
10.06.2025 18:27 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
We asked whether protein structure prediction models are biased toward idealized structures for de novo proteins. Indeed, for de novo proteins with diverse geometries, AlphaFold2 predicts structures closer to an idealized de novo protein than the solved NMR structures. (4/9)
10.06.2025 18:27 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
We find that a physics-based method (LUCS) samples greater structural diversity, approaching that observed in natural proteins, in a model protein fold than RFdiffusion, a generative model which utilizes the deep learning-based structure prediction network RoseTTAFold. (3/9)
10.06.2025 18:27 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0In this work we explored how deep learning methods for structure prediction and design may limit our exploration of designable protein space, by favoring “idealized” structures for de novo proteins, and how to overcome these limitations with new data and improved models. (2/9)
10.06.2025 18:27 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
We are excited to share our new preprint, “An improved model for prediction of de novo designed proteins with diverse geometries”. (1/9) www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
10.06.2025 18:27 — 👍 28 🔁 4 💬 1 📌 0
