Graham Kekule

The process needs to be under a month to be reasonable.

You are on notice, you know, we know, and the supreme court knows that your illegal gun restrictions cannot stand.

You're going to do nothing to stop the American public from accessing these firearms.

you have an AR in your pfp

The commonwealth has already opted to open their permitting process to nonresidents rather than face impending court orders mandating that they do so. Timeliness in this process is the next matter in front of the courts as some jurisdictions have opted to stall the process rather than comply

You must obey the fundamental right of all Americans to bear arms within the commonwealth, so you will complete your permitting process in a timely manner. Or the commonwealth will lose the privilege to make such determinations.

If this process takes less than 1 month then ok. If not, start deciding what you can and can't live without.

Then they will need to offer permits to nonresidents.

Nationwide concealed carry is coming and you wont stop it.

That's already how it works. People that don't obey gun laws already have guns on them around you.

Of course we need them. Have you been paying any attention to current events in the slightest?

From your ivory towers you worked so hard to climb your way into.

We plebs have won, and you have been crushed.

It is as satisfying as possible watching specifically law professors like you shake with impotent rage as we dismantle your scheme to erase one of the fundamental rights bequeathed to the people of this nation, despite all your scholarly ambitions to defraud us with your phony interpretations

Oh these also are made for our rifles as well. Shall not be infinged! You lost the gun control debate irreversably.

Mayor Adams Signs two Pieces of Legislation, Providing Extra Protection for FDNY EMTS and Paramedics MAY 1 - Mayor Adams Signs two Pieces of Legislation, Providing Extra Protection for FDNY EMTS and Paramedics

Why would EMTs want body armor?

www.nyc.gov/mayors-offic...

Having condoms in your nightstand is prudent.

National Burden of Injury and Deaths From Shootings by Police in the United States, 2015‒2020 | AJPH | Vol. 114 Issue 4 Objectives. To describe all-outcome injurious shootings by police and compare characteristics of fatal versus nonfatal injurious shootings nationally. Methods. From July 2021 to April 2023, we manuall...

ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/full/10....

4 shot at Brooklyn train station when officers open fire at knife-wielding man A 49-year-old bystander was hospitalized in critical condition following the shooting that began when police officers confronted a man trying to evade the fare, authorities said.

www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...

Being a noncombatant civilian in a location where the US military and/or police are operating is the best excuse possible to own body armor.

And why do journalists wear body armor when covering conflicts and attending protests?

Why do diplomats keep body armor in their embassies?

Having body armor in reserve is smart and only getting smarter.

Furthermore, there is absolutely a case for being protected from the police or military shooting at you.

Even accidentally.

The legal definition of arms as used by the founders includes body armor, so you're wrong. You cannot rebut or debate this, but you can research it and find that you're wrong.

I'm thinking an artificial superintelligence that generates weapons grade infohazards.

They are already going to be jailed. They broke the law. The law didn't stop them in the first place.

This applies to all the countries that have the gun control you want. Check out what's happening in Australia recently.

Most of these are illegal and will be overturned in court.
I welcome an 8th circuit AWB case.

What other of the Bill of Rights do you believe that states get to ignore?