@beanz122.bsky.social
He/him, gamer, engineer, my profile is my own and does not reflect the opinions of my employer.
@tolkoto.com
05.11.2025 19:31 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0King shit
05.11.2025 04:22 — 👍 55 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Can confirm. Line was nearly out the door when I checked 30 min ago
01.11.2025 19:05 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0"Maine people don't want to see us fighting against each other. They want to see solutions. I like to work on problems, fight problems, not fight people," Mills continued.
Yes they do Janet. Yes they absolutely do.
I thought there was no audio on the body cam? How do they know he said he was calling his boss and not just "the owner of the vehicle"?
16.07.2025 18:30 — 👍 44 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0I wonder how this will effect the DOJ's workload. Now instead of having a handful of cases challenging executive orders, they'll have dozens for each EO. Can DOJ handle that workload?
27.06.2025 14:38 — 👍 10 🔁 2 💬 2 📌 0I wonder how this will effect the DOJ's workload. Now instead of having a handful of cases challenging executive orders, they'll have dozens for each EO. Can DOJ handle that workload?
27.06.2025 14:38 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Giant Bomb is now independent
"Giant Bomb has new owners, and you're looking at them" - Jeff Grubb
VIVA LA @giantbomb.bsky.social
10.05.2025 23:12 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I share the same games for the same reasons. Tunic similarly.
09.04.2025 19:33 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Also I believe this is the filing of the reversal.
bsky.app/profile/bigc...
Yep!
09.04.2025 18:10 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Think they'll ask for en banc?
09.04.2025 18:08 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Unions have in the Alsup case in California since Alsup reversed his decision.
09.04.2025 18:07 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I think you're thinking of the Texas case. The NY hearing happened this morning.
09.04.2025 17:23 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0bsky.app/profile/klas...
09.04.2025 17:19 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It's a stay pending appeal. Not quite a green light yet.
09.04.2025 17:07 — 👍 26 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Some day that $10 is going to be worth a whole $1!
09.04.2025 13:34 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Got a public line?
09.04.2025 13:29 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Holy filler words, batman. Also I thought Peters was a lawyer. You'd think he'd be more composed with his answers.
09.04.2025 02:36 — 👍 14 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0NAL: My understanding is there's very little precedent, but they going to give it a shot.
08.04.2025 23:40 — 👍 9 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I'm surprised they were moved back to NY
08.04.2025 16:45 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0That is not what the ruling says.
08.04.2025 16:21 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Is that also a path forward for the courts deciding if Trump's use of AEA is lawful or not?
08.04.2025 14:58 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0That would give them a pass to ignore any order so long as they think it will be vacated by the SC.
08.04.2025 03:29 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Thanks for the report Chris. What do you view as the path for judicial review of Trump's use of AEA on its merits?
08.04.2025 02:37 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Since the SC said the proper venue is a habeus court, does the Boasberg case continue? If so, will we be doing this all again if/when Boasberg issues a PI tomorrow?
07.04.2025 23:49 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The fact that the court was unanimous for the fact that the deportees require due process is certainly a silver lining. I'm just wondering what happens with the Boasberg case now.
07.04.2025 23:14 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It's an administrative stay until the full court can rule. We'll probably see a result in the coming days.
07.04.2025 20:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Is*
07.04.2025 16:37 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
