Alan

Alan

@alangisaac.bsky.social

Economist and sci-fi fan.

288 Followers 268 Following 765 Posts Joined Sep 2023
1 day ago

I can’t believe we have to just watch the dumbest people on the planet figure out in real time why diplomacy exists

66 8 2 1
1 day ago

Remember: the current US Secretary of Defense is just a FOX talking head. Do not expect actual strategy.
www.independent.co.uk/news/world/a...

0 1 0 0
2 days ago
Video thumbnail

This might be the greatest split-screen ever broadcast.

They’ll play this in museums in future.

(🎥 LCI 🇫🇷)

18,063 7,162 616 576
2 days ago

Source: Monthly Treasure Statement.

0 0 0 0
2 days ago
Post image

In February the US spent more on interest out the debt than on Medicare or national defense. This will get worse.
#EconSky

1 0 1 0
2 days ago

Congress will not act unless voters insist.

0 0 0 0
2 days ago

Alexa, what do you think of this observation?

0 0 0 0
4 days ago

Rand Paul embraced the devil and now he whines when devilish consequences ensue. What is he doing to preclude future devilry?

#DisempowerTheExecutive

0 0 0 0
5 days ago

As I watch the bombs fall abroad and the masked thugs on America's streets, I feel disinclined to enlarge federal ability to tax.

3 0 1 0
1 week ago
Post image

#EconSky

0 0 0 0
1 week ago

#EconSky

1 0 0 0
1 week ago
Preview
Employment Situation News Release - 2026 M02 Results

#BureauofLaborStatistics: Total nonfarm payroll #employment edged down by 92,000 in February, and the #Unemployment rate
(edged up to) 4.4 percent.

Edged. #Trump #DonaldTrump #TACO #TrumpAlwaysChickensOut #TrumpTariffs #Economy #Tariffs #Inflation #FuckingMoron

www.bls.gov/news.release...

2 1 0 0
1 week ago

If you took $1 billion and gave it to the endowment of a different small college each day, they could each provide a free college education to several hundred students per year in perpetuity. Instead we are using that money to bomb schools and kill students in Iran, for no clearly stated purpose.

1,955 628 23 13
1 week ago

Oil prices surging again today, WTI crude oil up $4.75/bbl another 7%, with RBOB gasoline up 5.2%, national average likely now to head closer to $3.30/gal and beyond over next few weeks

32 7 2 17
1 week ago
Post image

#EconSky

4 7 0 0
1 week ago

Will the most servile law firms finally regret their obeissance?

1 0 0 0
1 week ago
Post image

#EconSky
(Updated.)

1 0 0 0
2 weeks ago
Post image

This is not just cosplay because ...

0 0 0 0
2 weeks ago
Post image

#EconSky

3 3 0 0
2 weeks ago

Just a reminder: Bitcoin fundamentals price it at zero.

Only speculative and criminal uses are sustaining it.

0 0 0 0
2 weeks ago
The figure documents a sizeable raw wage gap between workers who work from home and those who do not. As shown in the first bar, on average, the hourly wages of WFH workers are 35% higher than those of on-site workers. Once the authors look within occupation, education, and location, the wage premium associated with WFH shrinks substantially, to about 12% (second bar in the figure). Controlling further for other observable worker characteristics – such as age, gender, and job tenure – reduces the wage premium to 6.6% (third bar in the figure). 

Studies have found that workers typically value the option to work from home and are willing to accept sizable wage cuts in exchange for it, yet a growing literature finds that workers who work from home earn on average higher wages than workers who do not. This column combines French survey data, registry records, and social security records to show that the main driver of this work-from-home wage premium is selection. Workers who are more productive, or have better negotiation skills, appear able to get both higher hourly wages and the right to work from home more often.

Huiyu Li, Julien Sauvagnat, & Tom Schmitz show that the main driver of the work-from-home wage premium is selection. More productive workers with better negotiation skills are more able to get both higher wages and the right to work from home more often.
cepr.org/voxeu/column...
#EconSky

7 2 0 1
3 weeks ago
Preview
Live updates: Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s sweeping tariffs in 6-3 decision The Supreme Court ruled against President Donald Trump's far-reaching global tariffs on Friday, handing him a significant loss on an issue crucial to his economic agenda.

I'm surprised by even this modicum of independence, but I'm celebrating.
apnews.com/live/supreme...

0 0 0 0
3 weeks ago
Post image

JUST IN: Judge Provinzino in Minnesota has held a Justice Department attorney in civil contempt for violations of her order requiring the return of a released ICE detainee’s ID documents. He must pay $500 a day until the documents are returned.

14,248 4,052 421 399
3 weeks ago

Maybe turn to someone else in order to understand a paper written by actual economists?
www.vox.com/2020/5/8/212...

0 0 0 0
3 weeks ago

Only reality TV matters in Trumpland. Not reality.

0 0 0 0
3 weeks ago

Seeing an amazing emergent behavior where a document review agent finds internal wiki pages about the struggles of getting LLMs to understand our esoteric internal systems. The agent then decides its won’t be able to do the current task and aborts with a depressive note about its incompetence.

253 35 9 15
3 weeks ago

Censorship from the top can be fought on the Internet.

0 0 0 0
1 month ago

I worry more about the gap.

Profitable corporations employ people. Unprofitable corporations go bust and leave their workers without jobs. The statutory federal tax rate on corporate profits is 21%. These profits are again taxed as income when distributed as dividends or realized as capital gains.

0 0 1 0
1 month ago
Post image Post image

i know they are going to be our overlords soon etc but why are Claude's business mistakes SOO CUTE? don't send ur money to a venmo u hallucinated, you sweet silly baby!! www.newyorker.com/magazine/202...

5 2 0 0
1 month ago
Post image

#EconSky
Your occasional reminder of the magnitude of the US fiscal deficits. (Source: Monthly Treasury Statement)

3 1 1 1