@apaulus.bsky.social
international law, international politics, european law German law. Remessaging does not apply endorsement.
Die Meldung aus den USA ist frei erfunden.
08.02.2026 08:53 — 👍 5 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0Geschichte nur als Wahlfach? Unfassbar. Ein Anschlag auf die Demokratie.
26.01.2026 20:19 — 👍 4 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0
Trump’s actions are illegal – but his greed may hold him ... share.google/1PNQohrkJS7W...
11.01.2026 09:17 — 👍 3 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 1
Declaration of the German Society ofInternational Law on the US Military Intervention in Venezuela www.dgfir.de/en/aktuelles...
08.01.2026 14:46 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Eine Errungenschaft europäischer Zivilisation
zeitung.faz.net/data/564/rea...
Defense Minister Pistorius warned in the Bundestag that any forced Ukrainian capitulation would only strengthen Putin and encourage other autocrats. He outlined three core principles for peace: no unilateral territorial concessions, a strong Ukrainian military backed by real security guarantees.
26.11.2025 19:45 — 👍 357 🔁 48 💬 6 📌 2
In February, 1944, the British and ourselves reopened negotiations with the Swiss to obtain still further reductions in their exports to Ger¬ many. The Swiss Government, however, strongly resisted all our efforts and engaged in delaying tactics. With these negotiations still in course, I called in the Swiss Minister, Charles Bruggmann, on July 14. After emphasizing the traditional and inherently friendly relations between our peoples and Governments, I said I had already discovered that some of the countries listed as neutral did not seem clearly to appreciate the serious situation of countries like the United States. We, I pointed out, were losing thousands of lives, we had 8,000,000 armed men fighting on all battle fronts, we were spending $200,000,000,000, and we were supplying Great Britain and Russia to an enormous extent. “It’s not unnatural,” I said, “that Swiss businessmen should ask the intercession of their Government with ours so as to retain as much trade with the Axis as possible. I saw this happen to a great extent during the First World War, and I’ve seen it happen in this war. The Swedes pleaded with tears in their eyes for some time against what they regarded as excessive requests of the Allied nations to limit ever more the Swedish exports to Germany. Their main argument was the possible loss of coal from Germany, whereupon we suddenly discovered that they had coal on hand to keep them supplied for a year. “When the United States is losing lives right and left and is spend¬ ing enormous sums of money because of neutral aid to the enemy primarily in order to gratify some businessmen, the question becomes most serious to this country.”
The dark side of neutrality (from the memoirs of Cordell Hull, former US Secretary of State and Nobel Peace prize laureate in 1945)
11.11.2025 18:49 — 👍 15 🔁 5 💬 1 📌 0Volle Transparenz, ich war als rechtlicher Berater Mitglied des Redaktionsteams.
10.11.2025 20:55 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
The Peril of a White House That Flaunts Its Indifference to the Law www.nytimes.com/2025/10/24/u...
25.10.2025 07:16 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
The ICJ’s Advisory Opinion on Israel’s Obligations Towards UNRWA and Other International Organizations in the Occupied Territories: Key Issues at www.justsecurity.org/123215/icj-a...
24.10.2025 09:24 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0
Trump’s Dream of Infinite Presidential Power www.nytimes.com/2025/09/24/o...
25.09.2025 13:57 — 👍 0 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Danke! Sehr verdienstvoll!
17.09.2025 17:00 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Conservative legal luminary Jack Goldsmith points out that Justice Barrett's opinion in the universal injunction case rests on an error: For the purposes of historical analysis, she looked at the wrong statute and got the relevant date wrong by nearly *a century.*
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
For those in Berlin next Friday:
Event on the rule of law in the US with Andrew Weissmann and my colleague Kim Lane Scheppele. All welcome.
War heute in Natur und Wissenschaft-war etwas spät im Lesen. Ist mir aber ein Herzensanliegen, erst recht als distinguished fellow der Juristischen Fakultät der Hebräischen Universität Jerusalem.
11.06.2025 20:09 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Ich empfehle diesen Beitrag aus der F.A.Z.: Dies alles muss beendet werden
zeitung.faz.net/faz/natur-un...
Vielen Dank, bin gespannt auf die eingehende Lektüre, aber den Widerspruch zur aktuelleren Rspr. kann ich nicht erkennen. Die Konfrontation radikaler Meinungen dürfte die Anhänger beider Seiten bestätigen. Es fehlt eher an vermittelnden Positionen. Das ist aber stark wertungsabhängig.
24.05.2025 13:34 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
