I don't get why they're so up in arms. We know what the Supremes are going to do when it gets to them in the next several days.
05.10.2025 16:16 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@dsc250.bsky.social
feminist "law" professor, reproductive rights scholar/activist, avid cyclist, husband, dad, indie rock enthusiast, Vermont lover, Phillies fan, he/him
I don't get why they're so up in arms. We know what the Supremes are going to do when it gets to them in the next several days.
05.10.2025 16:16 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0BREAKING
04.10.2025 18:38 β π 10 π 0 π¬ 3 π 2Now time for 8 other schools to say the same.
04.10.2025 17:15 β π 4 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0TL;DR: Fuck off Trump.
04.10.2025 17:15 β π 13 π 4 π¬ 2 π 0lol, countdown to headlines that "some experts say" he can't do this
04.10.2025 01:21 β π 571 π 75 π¬ 48 π 14The Trump Court.
03.10.2025 21:00 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 1 π 031 USC 5114(b): "Only the portrait of a deceased individual may appear on United States currency and securities."
03.10.2025 18:40 β π 16 π 4 π¬ 4 π 0Maybe Trump doesn't win the Nobel Peace Prize because his definition of the word "peace" is very different than almost everyone else's.
03.10.2025 14:52 β π 4 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0Please join me in congratulating Woman on her appointment
03.10.2025 11:02 β π 16511 π 2603 π¬ 404 π 106You may have heard my arguments against the Electoral College before. Hereβs a new one the Founders never anticipated:
If the President is elected by popular vote, he probably wouldnβt selectively punish entire states for voting against him.
If FDA does change anything with mifepristone in the future, I sure wouldn't want to be the lawyer arguing to a judge that its actions aren't "arbitrary and capricious."
02.10.2025 20:45 β π 8 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0The anti abortion movement is 100% right to be furious about this.
Because even the Trump FDA is confirming what we've known for decades:
MIFEPRISTONE IS SAFE AND EFFECTIVE. FULL STOP.
The REALLY curious thing is that AP is reporting this company filed its application FOUR years ago.
Which means the Biden FDA sat on it . . . and the Trump FDA approved it.
FDA approval of generics isn't the same as a new drug, but they still have to be shown that the drug is safe and effective.
"Generic drug companies must submit evidence that all the ingredients used in their products are safe, and FDA must review that evidence."
When these people are sad, I'm happy.
02.10.2025 20:21 β π 14 π 3 π¬ 2 π 0In approving a drug, the FDA is giving its stamp of approval that it is safe and effective.
Yes, this FDA. Said that about mifepristone.
Everyone has same concerns about Eagles offense - predictable plays based on formation, WRs not schemed open, poor use of TEs who can't block, run plays lacking creativity of past.
A) Do reporters ask specific questions about these things?
B) Do coaches disagree since they aren't changing?
This is bonkers. The antiabortion movement has put a full court press on FDA to restrict mifepristone, and everyone is on edge that it will do so.
So what does FDA do? It approves a new generic mifepristone without changing anything about the restrictions.
Thank you RFK? ?!?!
Inconsistencies maybe, but meant to keep us off kilter by approving a new drug to make abortion more accessible and, by the laws of market dynamics, cheaper and easier to obtain?
That's some really stupid eleven dimensional chess if that's what's being played!
This is bonkers. The antiabortion movement has put a full court press on FDA to restrict mifepristone, and everyone is on edge that it will do so.
So what does FDA do? It approves a new generic mifepristone without changing anything about the restrictions.
Thank you RFK? ?!?!
Itβs also a separation of powers issue - itβs for Congress to put conditions on funds, not the President.
02.10.2025 10:59 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Trump's higher ed ransom note is here - everyone would have to acquiesce to their unprecedented demands or not be "given priority for grants," plus they can demand "reimbursement" for "violations" www.wsj.com/us-news/educ...
A mechanism to enforce fealty. An attack on academic freedom and democracy
No doubt Judge K was torn between his antiabortion bona fides and not ruling against Trump, who he wants to appoint him to a higher court. So he punted to someone else.
Not out of the woods at all, but glad to be out of this guyβs grasp!!
Wow, Judge Kaczmaryk, whine much?
01.10.2025 10:45 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0No doubt Judge K was torn between his antiabortion bona fides and not ruling against Trump, who he wants to appoint him to a higher court. So he punted to someone else.
Not out of the woods at all, but glad to be out of this guyβs grasp!!
EVERYTHING bad is bad for the Democrats, don't you know that?
30.09.2025 18:01 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Ahead of the case caption, a handwritten note: "Trump has pardons and tanks . . . . what do you have?" Judge Young's reply: "Dear Mr. or Ms. Anonymous, Alone, I have nothing but my sense of duty. Together, We the People of the United States β- you and me -- have our magnificent Constitution. Hereβs how that works out in a specific case β- "
AAUP v. Rubio is out, and look at how it starts. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
30.09.2025 16:37 β π 1676 π 542 π¬ 42 π 150