's Avatar

@anthonycalce.bsky.social

217 Followers  |  773 Following  |  786 Posts  |  Joined: 09.11.2024  |  2.2155

Latest posts by anthonycalce.bsky.social on Bluesky


Is there any doubt that Talarico is the best candidate now that we know CBS and Trump want Crockett to be the nominee?

17.02.2026 16:57 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I wonder if IN-05 would be on a 44 seat list?

13.02.2026 17:47 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

44 total, or 44 to flip?

13.02.2026 15:41 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Thanks!

12.02.2026 16:38 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

As of Feb. 10, 2026, the planet is tied for 2nd hottest on record, at 1.64Β°C above the 1850-1900 IPCC pre-industrial baseline.

The Climate 8-ball says, "El Nino? We don't need no stinkin' El Nino!"

12.02.2026 15:22 β€” πŸ‘ 104    πŸ” 44    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 3

What's the YTD number?

12.02.2026 15:26 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Does this include the downward revision for 2025?

12.02.2026 14:35 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Whether it was or wasn't she shouldn't be the nominee

10.02.2026 14:47 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

No, definitely not.

29.01.2026 21:01 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

I definitely think Cooper has the edge, but NC is very inelastic federally and I think NC Republicans turnout pretty well regardless of cycle.

29.01.2026 21:00 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Odds that we've already hit neutral conditions? Would that come later?

29.01.2026 18:37 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Update for surface temperatures through the 14th?

16.01.2026 03:39 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Have there been significant changes in LFPR for either group?

09.01.2026 18:33 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The people in it, maybe. One of the best cities we have though

22.12.2025 03:56 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

They don't have any power? Beyond caving on the shutdown I'm not sure what people expect.

03.12.2025 05:02 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Insane what crazed israel support does to people

28.11.2025 20:56 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Lemon meringue?

26.11.2025 00:17 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

You think I like those two? Lol.

24.11.2025 04:21 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

AOC, famously winning those hard to get voters in Queens and the Bronx. Lol. (And I like AOC)

You use the word "neoliberal" seriously. Not sure why anyone would listen to what you have to say

24.11.2025 02:37 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

If you have a better candidate then propose them

24.11.2025 02:31 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I continue to believe that the best candidates to bridge the ideological and generational divides in the party are warnock and especially ossoff. Unfortunately that would put a senate seat at risk, but GA gov could flip next year.

23.11.2025 20:43 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

And they would just keep doing that and putting off court cases? I would think they'd pick the one most likely to pass SCOTUS first-though this admin is not known for their intelligence ofc

30.10.2025 14:44 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Wonder what Trump would do if they get struck down. Do you have any indication of whether China (or anyone else) expect them to get struck down or no?

30.10.2025 14:33 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Are the 47% tariffs at risk in the Supreme Court case?

30.10.2025 14:23 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I agree, but less important that we put Dem voters in Houston and more important that we keep/put them in CA, WA, NY, NJ, MA, IL, OR, CT, MD, etc.

29.10.2025 21:36 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Wow. Hope it works out.

29.10.2025 20:11 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

bsky.app/profile/anth...
Do you know how non-ACA plans will be affected?

29.10.2025 19:53 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I misread, you are right. The charge would increase 26%, but the actual cost to the consumer would be the 114%.

29.10.2025 19:52 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

It's not 115%. Not sure where the reporter got that number. Still way bigger than Oz's nonsense though

29.10.2025 19:40 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Is this not being done through the IEEPA?

27.10.2025 19:54 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@anthonycalce is following 19 prominent accounts