's Avatar

@jw-here.bsky.social

Londoner Random stuff (for now).. Moving from that other place

156 Followers  |  266 Following  |  1,866 Posts  |  Joined: 10.11.2024  |  2.2407

Latest posts by jw-here.bsky.social on Bluesky

wow. that's 33k wasted.

04.02.2026 19:02 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

if starmer goes (cos of may elections or mandy or w/ever) who would replace him? is that an opportunity - it was starmer who ran on staying out and was thus tied to it... s/one else may not feel so obliged and perhaps could do the "the world has changed since '24..." thing

04.02.2026 18:28 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I can imagine even joining the euro would be (very marginally) less unacceptable to the brexity eejets

04.02.2026 18:24 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Also, better to have an *actual* King (who - no doubt with govt involvement) has been dealing with the Andy Problem, at least to some extent.... whereas the US head of state....

04.02.2026 16:27 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Well, I guess at least he's being honest about that *now*.

But why why why appoint him in the first place. He *may* have been (thought to be) a good pick politically or whatever, but the utter truck load of baggage should have been sufficient warning to keep well clear.

04.02.2026 16:16 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Or worse....!

(I'm not getting why there seems to be nothing coming out of this tranche of epstein that gets anywhere near trump)

04.02.2026 15:49 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

it is looking rather like that. keir seem to reliant on him / too trusting of his judgement (whether or not mcsweeny knew some/all the newly public facts in this particular case)

04.02.2026 14:16 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

especially unlikely to have been a popular move with the USofA at the moment, what with their "leadership" being a bastian of equality and meritocracy.

04.02.2026 14:15 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

for sure he still has a very cushy position, and if true needs to lose further. but my point was that it seems many others are named and have absolutely no consequence not a single thing (yet). tho maybe this IS starting to change (mandelson eg)

03.02.2026 08:11 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Trump will just keep pushing the same thing again and again until (if he had his way) we (europeans) would be paying the same insane level for our healthcare as americans

02.02.2026 17:03 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

At very least thats surely breaking Official Secrets if not something somewhat more serious. [ that the sender, seemingly Mandleson but the name shown *is redacted* ]

02.02.2026 16:58 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

John Pond wasn't so much *copied in* (ie just one more person on the Cc list -- and I'd imagine the PM and even the PM's pseudonym would receive A LOT of this) but John Pond appears to be the original intended recipient -- So want Mandelson was doing we sharing info SPECIFICALLY intended for the PM

02.02.2026 16:57 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

and thats the person americans, collectively, voted to be their leader and representative to the world, despite much of this being reasonably well known or at least strongly suspected...

sad.

02.02.2026 08:20 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

and/or target removal of, at least a certain % of peers (regardless of affiliation) based on least attending first.

01.02.2026 12:33 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

it does seem like Andrew MW is so far one of very few (alleged or proven) to have actually suffered any consequences.

i am NOT saying I feel sorry for him, it does tho seem the King has gone further than most police/courts/governments is taking steps.

01.02.2026 12:31 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

So, trumps intention is that future generations of US citizens will be more ignorant of their country's history than everyone else.

01.02.2026 12:19 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I agree (I've watched it). Show the reality on one screen and show Melanie's expensive propaganda in a smaller (empty) screen next door.

30.01.2026 23:00 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

some enterprising (independant) cinema should screen Melanie's film in one screen and "the apprentice" in another.

30.01.2026 08:14 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

mericans could always throw their hallowed constitution on the fire to keep warm. doesnt seem much good for anything else these days

30.01.2026 00:56 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

its the US that won't survive. the more trump does to other countries the more he'll unify factions in those countries.

30.01.2026 00:48 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

America, sort out your unreliable lying pedo president. the dangerous thing rn is america.

30.01.2026 00:43 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

when it gets on amazon prime (like, next week, probably) you'll have to pay extra for the adverts

29.01.2026 22:43 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Certain to win the FIFA Oscars

29.01.2026 22:40 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

who have become pirates

27.01.2026 23:59 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

who thought forage would be so keen on recycling?

27.01.2026 20:12 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

If it ever gets shown at cinemas here in the uk, the cinema likely will get boycotted for all films for a while.

at least if its an amazon film we already know where to NOT watch it.

27.01.2026 20:01 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Much more video 2000.
Didn't just lose, but got mostly forgotten about.

26.01.2026 13:19 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

And Truss.
She must be feeling left out, poor thing.

26.01.2026 13:16 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

And presumably must NOT have any desire to ever be a leader (or deputy leader, unless Tice gets demoted again).

26.01.2026 12:52 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

What's more, isn't this likely to *disaffect* longer-standing Reform potential candidates - joined a fledgling party and now find all these rats jumping into the limelight undoubtedly ahead of them for "selection".

26.01.2026 12:49 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@jw-here is following 19 prominent accounts