This is eerie coming from just leaving pax 45 minutes ago fresh off the high from the gang being really good. What a game
22.11.2025 05:25 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@seraphimseraphina.bsky.social
she/her • Writer, Game Designer, Professional Amateur • Co-moderator of the Dice Exploder Discord server • trans queer woman of color • that friend who probably has a game recommendation for you
This is eerie coming from just leaving pax 45 minutes ago fresh off the high from the gang being really good. What a game
22.11.2025 05:25 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Folks are still catching up to @armaanautomatic.itch.io's brilliant piece on The Ultimates #17 and ADHD:
comicsxf.com/2025/10/26/d...
post brought to you by Cosmic Frog, a board game I just grabbed by Jenna Felli, which opens with a creation myth of the cosmology of the game, and from there only goes harder with mechanics like "leap into the Aether and disgorge your gullet of vast tracts of land into your inter-dimensional vault"
29.10.2025 15:42 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0i need more games for sickos. so many are so intensely aiming for broad appeal. whenever i find a game that is unapologetically weird it feels exactly like a glass of water in the middle of the desert. do your own specific thing. give me, the sicko, something i can sink my teeth into.
29.10.2025 15:42 — 👍 9 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0I think the gap between those two is not as large as you imply here- for a lot of publishers, without secured preorders that provide production funds a smaller riskier project might not make it to physical form.
14.10.2025 13:02 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0The advice for that is ultimately the same though- don’t crowdfund until core deliverables are ready for production, and keep scope considered and achievable
14.10.2025 13:00 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0One of the things I took away from the analyses @gigantic-spider.bsky.social does is that the prospects for a small project with good outreach and a well considered funding goal are pretty decent- I think the other concern here is delivering not just one, but essentially multiple projects.
14.10.2025 13:00 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0That person is @gigantic-spider.bsky.social , and they’re actually monthly posts! Really useful analysis that they put a lot of work into
14.10.2025 05:51 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Part 3 is here. The deep dive into the Ennies. If you're someone who doesn't know much about the Ennie Awards, you should read parts 1 and 2. But if you like a bit of inside baseball and are interested in award shows in general—this is the article for you.
www.explorersdesign.com/ennies-3/
Alright, the first in-depth article of my awards debrief is live. "How do the Ennies work?" A top-down look at my judging experience from A to Z.
Please share, leave comments, and ask questions. And don't forget to read part 1 if you haven't already.
www.explorersdesign.com/ennies-2/
one thing thats crazy is that all art movements are just systems of hundreds of individual little unique goblins, none of whom did the exact movement; particles of the movement wave
07.10.2025 04:17 — 👍 188 🔁 31 💬 6 📌 0What. What is the play on words supposed to be. Is it “hypnotized”? But that’s not how that word ends. What.
07.10.2025 06:06 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Derelict Delvers is a really cool one by @capacle.bsky.social capacle.itch.io/derelictdelv...
04.10.2025 15:09 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0hi i'm getting a kickass set of new genitals installed in 2 weeks from now !! isn't that fucking cool ?
i could use a little bit of help with medical bills + housing expenses during recovery and so i've set up a little gofundme!
gofund.me/394dc2e93
I wrote a little about criticism today. idlecartulary.com/2025/09/25/w...
24.09.2025 20:34 — 👍 56 🔁 26 💬 1 📌 3An image with black text that reads "'DOOM RUNS ON EVERYTHING!' DOES IT RUN ON PAPER?'" The words "DOOM" and "PAPER" are dark red. Under the text is the logo for GUTGUN, which displays the title akin to dangling guts from the barrel of a gun.
SEE FOR YOURSELF
incaseofgrace.itch.io/gutgun
The modern equivalent of a heartbreaker is some game that no one has ever heard about that has amazing design principles that are innovative or elegant or just really well done, but that are languishing on itch because no one has ever thought to read it.
23.09.2025 09:35 — 👍 70 🔁 19 💬 2 📌 3I can acknowledge that maybe my terminology or specific example (Masks) are not communicating this clearly, but I do genuinely experience those two as being different approaches to character, and I'd love to know a way to frame that which would make more sense to you.
18.09.2025 14:03 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Is there an example from another game that you feel conveys the difference in experience I have between being told my character has a job and a wife and being told my character feels angry at the world and always wants to rebel against it?
18.09.2025 14:03 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0excellent taste tbh, but mangoes and oranges are lovely too! this is making me want to eat more fruit
17.09.2025 18:44 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0can we get a top three list of favorite fresh fruit types
17.09.2025 18:16 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0triangle agency is a fun game to play with your friends :)
17.09.2025 17:33 — 👍 80 🔁 11 💬 5 📌 0@seraphimseraphina.bsky.social published a really neat case study of Triangle Agency today with @jdragsky.bsky.social's Expressionism as a frame! It's very cool to see someone doing a deep read of what's going on within our game and how that affects/supports certain modes of play.
17.09.2025 16:14 — 👍 35 🔁 10 💬 1 📌 0and to @calebzane.bsky.social and @seanireland.bsky.social for designing this incredible game, which you can buy here!
shop.hauntedtable.games
Many thanks to @jdragsky.bsky.social for the manifesto, which you can read here,
possumcreek.medium.com/the-expressionist-games-manifesto-122d8afd1fe2
I've been thinking on how to apply the expressionist manifesto as a lens for looking at games, and I decided to demonstrate that approach by analyzing how Triangle Agency aims at expressionist goals and, in doing so, earns a place in my heart.
www.tumblr.com/seraphim-ser...
2.1 Lenses, Not Boxes I wondered whether this section was necessary, but games discourse seems to repeatedly find itself adrift in questions of whether (blank) counts as a (blank). We have seen the question repeatedly: Do games count as art? [41] Do games without goals count as games? [79] Is The Sims a game? [190] Are hypertexts interactive fiction? [157] Are Twine pieces literature? [151]. In fairness to the researchers cited here, all of whom I respect immensely, many of these sources pose or imply the question rhetorically. Still, the necessity of such a framing frustrates me. “Is a ?” is, in my opinion, a fruitless question. The question can never be answered to anyone’s satisfaction, and it often serves as either a provocation to espouse politics or as a cover to institute gatekeeping. Its agenda is usually opaque to onlookers and bewildering to those trying to advance the field from across disciplines. We should be thinking in lenses, not boxes. It is always more interesting to ask “If we think of through the lens of (blank), what do we learn?” We know it is more interesting to ask “What do we learn by considering Tom Stoppard through the lens of poststructuralism?” than to ask “Is Stoppard’s work poststructuralist?” And while some works may be more or less fruitful when examined through different lenses, sometimes the most unlikely pairings of lenses and objects are the most rewarding. Certainly any of the questions above would be much better served by reframing them in this way.
Credit to @stcymsn.bsky.social for putting words to this principle in their dissertation! It's a principle I had seen elsewhere in more words, and had been trying to follow myself, but the clear framing here helped so much in my efforts to communicate how I was approaching conversations.
16.09.2025 17:59 — 👍 10 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 0"Is this play risky? is this game OSR?" close off thought. The framing presupposes limited binary answers.
"What's risky about this play? What do we learn about this game from the history of the OSR?" opens up exploration, invites specific examples, creates dialogue.
Lenses, not boxes. 2/2
This touches on a principle I embrace- lenses, not boxes. Putting things in boxes means defining hard boundaries, losing nuance, and resigning ourselves to only benefiting from one framing. Using lenses instead of boxes means we can use more of them, and see what we learn from new perspectives. 1/2
16.09.2025 17:59 — 👍 34 🔁 7 💬 1 📌 0