Circumspectral's Avatar

Circumspectral

@catpushmike.bsky.social

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐ŸŽถ๐Ÿ“ท๐Ÿšฒ๐Ÿงณ Adopted son of the boreal forest. Canadian field trash. Unintentional contrarian. Proud reply guy. Photographer in Oaxaca. Traveling by bus, visiting villages and towns in this cradle of civilization. โ€ขMigrating to Ghost. See you soon!โ€ข

3,699 Followers  |  877 Following  |  8,627 Posts  |  Joined: 20.11.2024  |  2.4446

Latest posts by catpushmike.bsky.social on Bluesky

Shit guy saying shit.

No need to parse it.

18.02.2026 06:01 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Unintentional self-parody is the good stuff. Otherwise Axios wouldnโ€™t be worth reading.

18.02.2026 05:57 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

In case no oneโ€™s noticed, itโ€™s educated people with college degrees who are the driving force behind the present fascist regime.

Laughing at the poor, the ignorant and the uneducated isnโ€™t going to change that.

18.02.2026 05:18 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 7    ๐Ÿ” 4    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Set a living wage. For smaller companies, the mom-and-poppers, etc, that might struggle with that, subsidize them with higher taxes on large corporations making big profits or from excessive stock market gains.

There are ways. In the end all workers with a living wage is good for everybody.

18.02.2026 01:48 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

YouTube. Ok. I will search.

18.02.2026 01:32 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Where can I watch this?

18.02.2026 01:31 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Why? Thats the logic of enablers Iโ€™m sorry to say. We know ad nauseum what heโ€™s telling them. In no way do we have to take him seriously.

Platforming him in mainstream spaces only helps his base grow larger.

18.02.2026 00:12 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Why canโ€™t everyone just ignore this dipshit?

17.02.2026 20:20 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Stop giving this creep oxygen!!!!!!!

17.02.2026 20:18 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 9    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Youโ€™re veering away from the threadโ€™s topic. Who exactly was it who refused to vote for Harris, making things easier for Trump?

I would call them nihilists. They helped set back the hard work of building a Denmark-like society by at least half a decade.

Complicated subject. Iโ€™ll leave it there.

17.02.2026 20:16 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

โ€œus socialist leftโ€

Is that even a thing? There are a lot of cosplay revolutionaries who call themselves leftists, but are politically useless. They have no intention of doing any work beyond shitposting.

Progressives is a better term for leftists who understand what it takes to achieve aims.

17.02.2026 18:31 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

You only need look at the PV data for โ€˜20 & โ€˜24. 6M fewer votes for Dems, or, 6M fewer against Trump. Something happened.

Donโ€™t blame โ€œleftistsโ€. No sane leftist would allow a fascist tyrant gain power to spite a moderate liberal.

These were nihilists and posers falsely claiming the left.

17.02.2026 18:24 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Nihilists be like โ€œletโ€™s focus our energies on shitting all over cringe libs so we can muddy the waters and make things easier for the fashโ€

17.02.2026 17:54 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I honestly couldnโ€™t give a shit. You know what weโ€™re saying. Mr. Nitpick. Donโ€™t you have anything better to do?

I block pests.

17.02.2026 17:32 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I would only say then that they have some โ€˜splaininโ€™ to do. Itโ€™s not a great look.

17.02.2026 17:24 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I love the headlineโ€™s implication that Bannon himself some regular guy, and not equally toxic.

But this is the NYT, falsely feigning surprise to obfuscate evil.

17.02.2026 14:08 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

AOC yes. Harris nope.

17.02.2026 10:17 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

A Richard Hanania/Curtis Yarvin debate on endless loop would be a fitting circle of hell for anyone whoโ€™s ever called either of those pompous frauds intellectuals.

17.02.2026 10:10 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

It seems he has access to better drugs than Musk.

17.02.2026 10:04 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

When your highest priority as a politician is champion of another country, things start to get weird.

17.02.2026 09:58 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

That all depends of course. Politicians accepting donations from convicted child sex pimps. Right or wrong?

17.02.2026 09:57 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Chuckeem must go.

17.02.2026 09:52 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

The longest lasting pull-focis shot in history finally resolving into something we can discern and identify.

And it isnโ€™t pretty. Not at all.

17.02.2026 09:51 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Thereโ€™s something weirdly dystopian about measuring loneliness with statistical data.

17.02.2026 09:35 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 7    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Thatโ€™s Twitter right? No self-awareness, I guess.

17.02.2026 05:32 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

It was a year ago that the DOGE vandalism spree got up to speed. Politicians on both sides simply watched. The media whitewashed it as โ€œfinding savingsโ€, โ€œeliminating wasteโ€ and โ€œefficiencyโ€.

17.02.2026 05:22 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

And yet look at Musk swanning around suffering almost no elite opprobrium.

17.02.2026 05:14 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I gave up on AC after he scolded the left for questioning CNNโ€™s decision to hold a Trump town hall in June of 2024 with only hand-picked GOP supporters in the crowd.

Told us to get out of our silos. Fuck him.

17.02.2026 04:26 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 18    ๐Ÿ” 3    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Never took the rightโ€™s definition of working class seriously. It makes my ears bleed hearing clean hands media types who took their cues from that BS, never talking about the millions of urban service workers around them who actually make up the majority of the working class, however you define it.

17.02.2026 04:19 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Sure. Who doesnโ€™t believe that? But when there are photographs and victims willing to swear or whoโ€™ve already given sworn statements, itโ€™s not rash to expect they open investigations and issue indictments.

It isnโ€™t lack of evidence holding prosecutors back, itโ€™s corruption and pressure.

17.02.2026 03:11 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

@catpushmike is following 20 prominent accounts