If you had to call out the mass analyzer in the title what would you call it? Maybe something like “next gen q-TOF” or “q-OT-TOF”? It’s definitely impressive work though
17.01.2025 15:48 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0@thirdcoastms.bsky.social
Currently Mass Spec SW Marketing, former TMO SW Product Manager. Background in LCMS method development for topdown and bottom up proteomics.
If you had to call out the mass analyzer in the title what would you call it? Maybe something like “next gen q-TOF” or “q-OT-TOF”? It’s definitely impressive work though
17.01.2025 15:48 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Do you have a link?
17.01.2025 03:29 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I think this was addressed in Spectronaut 18. Upon expiration, the license should default to the viewer and persist as a viewer. If that's not the case, contact support.
06.12.2024 20:11 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Forgot to mention that a lot of people like to mix Trypsin and LysC for bottom up. If you're doing a labeling experiment that targets Lysine you may need to go for an alternative protease to get "bottom up" sized peptides because the lysine may be blocked by the label and cause a missed cleavage.
20.11.2024 18:31 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0If you have a specific question that you need to answer then these alternative proteases could be helpful, but in my experience none are as specific as a good trypsin. Occasionally new enzymes are mentioned in the literature and even more rarely brought to market.
20.11.2024 18:28 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Chimerys is running on the server but other compute intensive process still run on the host PC. (in case you are still wondering after 12 months)
19.11.2024 19:41 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0