Congrats Courtney and the team! Very interesting work.
23.07.2025 06:25 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0@arielkaplan.bsky.social
Single molecule biophysics, Optical Tweezers, Chromatin, Transcription, Polymerases, Helicases Associate Professor, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology https://kaplan.net.technion.ac.il/
Congrats Courtney and the team! Very interesting work.
23.07.2025 06:25 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Oldies but Goldies. from 2007. Light-powering Escherichia coli with proteorhodopsin www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
10.06.2025 12:56 β π 3 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0@arielchazan.bsky.social @galitzlil.bsky.social
31.05.2025 12:57 β π 5 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Graphs showing 25 years of budgets for the National Institute of Health, NASA, and the NSF. In all cases, the proposed budget for next year is far, far below any year of the previous quarter century.
There are 2 previous historical cases of countries destroying their science and universities, crippling them for decades: Lysenkoism in the USSR and Nazi Germany. The Trump administration will be the 3rd.
It's not just budgets but research, institutions, expertise, and training the next generation.
Nice work by the Kurumizaka Lab in @natcomms.nature.com
Multiple structures of RNA polymerase II isolated from human nuclei by ChIP-CryoEM analysis
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
1/
New preprint!
How do transcription factors (TFs) use intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) to find their target sites?
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
#TranscriptionFactors #IDPs #SingleMolecule #Biophysics
Super cool work on the function of intrinsically disordered regions in regulating transcription factor DNA binding.
28.05.2025 10:53 β π 13 π 7 π¬ 1 π 0The energy landscape of a single disordered protein (tau) and the impact of PTMs is resolved. An important step to understanding the function and dysfunction of disordered proteins from their conformational ensemble. Not yet peer reviewed. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
28.05.2025 18:56 β π 1 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0How to find Evolutionary Conserved Enhancers in 2025? π£-π
Check out our paper - fresh off the press!!!
We find widespread functional conservation of enhancers in absence of sequence homology
Including: a bioinformatic tool to map sequence-diverged enhancers!
rdcu.be/enVDN
github.com/tobiaszehnde...
Thanks!
28.05.2025 13:30 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Thanks!
We don't know specifically about the sliding length - but that's definitely something we would like to look at.
And thank you for reminding me about your paper, very relevant and interesting.
n/
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
technion.bsky.social
#Transcription #TranscriptionFactors #IDPs #SingleMolecule #Biophysics
#IDRs #IntrinsicallyDisordered #OpticalTweezers #FacilitatedDiffusion
#DNAunzipping
18/
Kudos to Nir Strugo (nirstrugo.bsky.social)β¬ who led the work, with help from Carmit Burstein, Noam Nago, and Hadeel Khamis, and also Saddam Hossein from the Hoffman Lab.
Thanks to Hagen Hofmann, Naama Barkai, Moshe Goldsmith, Gabi Rosenblum and vmindel.bsky.socialοΏ½οΏ½οΏ½ for comments and/or help!
17/
Bottom line:
Using single-molecule assays, we show that IDRs modulate Msn2 binding to its target motif by tuning genome exploration.
This occurs via non-specific (or rather quasi-specific) association and sequence-sensitive facilitated diffusion, shaped by disordered regions.
16/
Together, our results support a model in which IDRs:
1. Facilitate initial non-specific association, stabilized by the DBD. Association, stabilization, or both, are sensitive to the sequence.
2. Enhance sequence-dependent diffusion toward the motif.
15/
What about the diffusion? sequence-sensitive ?
We perturbed IDR function during the sliding phase only (post-binding).
This had no effect for the arb. seq. but reduced STO probability and delayed detection for Hap4
β IDRs enhance diffusion in a sequence-sensitive manner.
14/
Can we pinpoint which specific phase of the search is sequence-sensitive?
Hap4 showed increased non-specific binding, while dissociation rates (very low for both environments) were similar.
Conclusion: initial association, but not dissociation, is sequence-sensitive.
13/
Can this mechanism explain Msn2βs promoter selectivity?
We tested by replacing our "arbitrary" flanking region with a segment from the Hap4 promoter (a native Msn2 target).
Strikingly, STO binding increased to ~100%, and TFs were detected faster.
12/
Surprisingly, TFs were detected at the motif in ~30% of molecules, despite no free TFs in solution and irreversible dissociation conditions. This required intact IDRs, supporting a search mechanism based on non-specific binding and 1D diffusion on DNA.
11/
To test this, we developed a new assay, which we called Sliding-to-Target Occupation (STO):
We unzip DNA, incubate with TFs for 1 min, and then move to a TF-free channel where we perform repeated unzipping cycles to detect binding at the motif.
10/
Since IDRs increased both non-specific binding and association to the motif, we asked:
Can these non-specifically bound proteins ultimately reach the motif by sliding on DNA?
9/
We also found that Msn2 interacts with single-stranded DNA through its IDRs. This was evident in rezipping hysteresis, EMSA, and the kinetics of DNA hairpin closing.
These interactions may be relevant for binding melted promoter regions during activation.
8/
Based on these assays, and complementary EMSA and mass photometry experiments, we could conclude that IDRs promote cooperative formation of non-specific multimeric Msn2βDNA complexes, which are further stabilized by the DBD.
7/
During unzipping, we also detected non-specific binding events, evident as peaks far from the canonical motif.
These were frequent with full-length Msn2, rare with the DBD alone, and absent with the IDRs only or in protein-free controls.
6/
So IDRs affect the affinity, but is this due to a change in association or dissociation rate?
With our previously developed fluctuation assay (Khamis 2021), we saw that IDR deletion didn't affect k_{off} but reduced k_{on} 6-fold
βIDRs enhance association, not stability.
5/
Charge-mediated interactions mediate IDRs contribution: Adding free L-arginine reduced binding, but the effect was reversed at pH 9.8, where arginine is neutral. Notably, the DBD-only variant was less affected, giving us a tool to selectively perturb IDRs.
4/
Removing the IDRs sharply reduced both the probability and strength of binding at the recognition motif.
This suggests that IDRs enhance binding affinity.
3/
Msn2 has a canonical zinc finger DNA-binding domain (DBD) flanked by long IDRs.
What role do these IDRs play in DNA binding?
We used a single-molecule DNA unzipping assay capable of detecting DNA-bound proteins, and three variants: WT, DBD-only, and IDR-only.