Jesse Kodadek

Absolutely unhinged.

It's not even the same color ink as the foreperson's signature! Now it's just funny.

Yeah, that's what the Court already said happened in its earlier opinion:

OK, you are right. The Court already reached this conclusion earlier:

If this is true then it's the worst detail so far.

I don't think this fits with @scotusplaces.bsky.social 's (cleaned up) model usage.

I don't think "mistake" is the correct term.

I might be reading it wrong but is it OK if I think this is very good?

He will post through it, relentlessly.

Quoting 28 USC 636: (1)Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary— (A)a judge may designate a magistrate judge to hear and determine any pretrial matter pending before the court, except a motion for injunctive relief, for judgment on the pleadings, for summary judgment, to dismiss or quash an indictment or information made by the defendant, to suppress evidence in a criminal case, to dismiss or to permit maintenance of a class action, to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and to involuntarily dismiss an action. A judge of the court may reconsider any pretrial matter under this subparagraph (A) where it has been shown that the magistrate judge’s order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

While local rules definitely come into play, I am not sure this order is objectionable as a matter of right, because 28 USC 636 provides:

well, that’s enough internet for this century

Guessing it's between the two competing owners.

The RICO skeet following that one is even better, IMO.

What is the best answer to questions about why the Democrats did not release more info earlier, like before the last presidential election?

Not quite exculpatory.

Downhill skiing? Leg blasters are undefeated.

Luckily courts don't usually mind contempt from litigants about their rulings.

Montana is the same way. Just impossible for normal people to run.

In a very obscure case. /s

All I did was ask him to tell his clients to quit violating a permanent injunction.

Jesse, Seriously what is your problem. This is why so many people do not like you.

Greatest work email I've ever received.

I can see my office from here.

This would make sense if the VP wasn't a groyper.

This one, in Montana, appears to have a better 360-degree view during business hours.

I…I…oh never mind.

Reminds me of when Montana governor Brian Schweitzer used a “VETO” branding iron to veto Republican bills. Great theater.

NOT ALL OF US.

Any active judge in the circuit, or any judge who was on the panel (if senior).

I don't think this means Thomas is the one who called for the vote though?

I think only one Bivens got a shot at the remedy. No money for Bivens Jr.