A bartender friend is prepared to warn all her customers if she sees them at her venue.
11.02.2026 17:05 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@khsinclair.bsky.social
Husband, father, empty nester, computer programmer, from MIT AI to robotics and speech and back to AI, now retired.
A bartender friend is prepared to warn all her customers if she sees them at her venue.
11.02.2026 17:05 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Any Dem who's not ready to instantly shut down her personal insults and redirections should lose their questioning privileges for the year.
11.02.2026 13:26 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0And in the case of Canada those senators have a lot of constituents newly holding dual citizenship!
11.02.2026 03:39 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Oh, of course. But a real primary with someone like Presley would have been best.
10.02.2026 20:57 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Too bad he can't run for Senator Emiratus.
10.02.2026 20:50 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Clearer message: more than 21m don't have a passport or an original birth certificate with their current name. Easier for the reader to put themselves in the frame instead of someone else.
10.02.2026 19:30 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Pierre still paying the price for stealing Joey's chart
10.02.2026 19:05 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I will not support any funding deal that puts money in the hands of Stephen Miller, Kristi Noem, and this violent agency. Defund and abolish ICE now.
10.02.2026 16:35 β π 29360 π 5621 π¬ 746 π 442Next step is harder: find undocumented omissions and force them to explain, per law.
10.02.2026 12:21 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0So now that they understand the rule, they need to systematically unredact all the names and addresses in the files. Not piecemeal when called on it by a Rep. Only victims identities to be redacted.
10.02.2026 12:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0DoJ really wants to get some horrified Democrats to validate their redaction process and say public access should rightfully be limited.
Redact victims only. Shouldn't be that difficult. But all observers need to beware of planted disinformation.
Replace it with "No File", where the IRS uses the data it already collects to just send you a bill with an explanation you can either accept or choose to file old-school.
09.02.2026 00:32 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0"Justice has failed. DoJ is failing. I'm not gonna look at this evidence until it's all released to the public with only lawful documented redactions."
09.02.2026 00:28 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0No other Dems should look at them. They're too gullible and will end up reinforcing admin propaganda.
09.02.2026 00:22 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Not if every registrar has to inspect physical certified documents tracing the history of every voter back to their original birth certificate. And explain to many married women why they can't vote anymore. On pain of imprisonment if their GOP watcher can find fault.
08.02.2026 21:22 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Weren't the long fluffy recipe intros originally added for SEO? And now the machines are copying the style, for no purpose whatsoever?
08.02.2026 17:31 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0And this bill would let the administration force you to repeatedly reregister, in person, by purging voter rolls in targeted blue neighborhoods. Until you give up or rebel.
08.02.2026 14:03 β π 14 π 1 π¬ 2 π 0So if we control a house of Congress, we can bring to vote a resolution not to disqualify Trump, but to affirm him as president. If he wins a 2/3 vote, then he's legitimately president. Otherwise not. Do I have that right?
07.02.2026 00:22 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Read a list of improperly redacted "friends of Epstein" into the congressional record. Much more valuable than the intended outrage reactions to csam.
06.02.2026 22:00 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Who has standing to sue DoJ for the obviously illegal redactions they've made so far? Does having their Member confirm the unexplained and improper nature of a redaction help?
06.02.2026 21:56 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Podcast audio is openly distributed on the Internet without restriction, via RSS. Video is only available through closed platforms, where it will be increasingly controlled and monetized.
So, yeah, it's a threat.
Aren't these mostly codified in statute or constitution already? What's needed is machinery to enforce them on the uncooperative administration. The ICE OUT act, granting private and state rights of action, might help.
05.02.2026 02:55 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0And why was the sender's name illegally redacted without explanation by DoJ?
04.02.2026 19:10 β π 69 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0It's blue cities and districts in red/purple states that they'll target
04.02.2026 18:45 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Dems #1 job now is to make existing law and bill of rights enforceable. The Swalwell/Goldman ICE OUT act may be a good start.
04.02.2026 13:59 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0But P/B hasn't changed at all
04.02.2026 13:47 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Not "should have". They are mandated by law to do that.
31.01.2026 18:11 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0They're not following the redaction law either. They're supposed to redact victims, not perpetrators, and document every omission.
31.01.2026 18:07 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0OpenAI also making buy/build decisions with their own chip team and Broadcom, and Nvidia wants to influence that.
Though Broadcom is being cautious about committing capacity until OpenAI commits money, so it's complicated.
This looks much better than restating laws that already exist (such as "please don't deport US citizens"). Congress needs to make existing law enforceable to get ICE under control, until they have the power to abolish it.
30.01.2026 20:31 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0