's Avatar

@gstadt.bsky.social

184 Followers  |  406 Following  |  62 Posts  |  Joined: 20.08.2024  |  2.4211

Latest posts by gstadt.bsky.social on Bluesky

This is the issue - greater obligations for those that come here (foreigners) vs those already here. Beggers belief that Labour can't see the problem with this.

21.10.2025 12:00 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

There's massive capital over-allocation. Reporting reqs won't save them from a big devaluation.

03.10.2025 18:40 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Very good Ian. Politics of Strategy loses direction/value without politics of morals. Heart before head every time.

Telling that Trump is successful because he knows this (how you feel vs how things empirically are)

03.10.2025 18:12 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Think most of ABs support would fold under AR (his mate) in a real leadership challenge

29.09.2025 19:52 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Its amazing what you learn sometimes. I didn't even know what a goyser was before today

12.09.2025 20:56 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Wolknade at 10 and Isak at 9. Think Eddie is trying 352 to acmmodate both. May have been Larssen at 9 instead. May be wrong

31.08.2025 18:33 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Bayern are gutted we've got him. That beats any YouTube clips

29.08.2025 21:24 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Not sure its isaks replacement

28.08.2025 20:31 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Moving to a flexible front 3 where all can play as 9, if needed ...Eddie thinks he can turn him into turbo-charged version of Haaland.

H is a 10, though

28.08.2025 19:59 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Wasn't it ever the way

28.08.2025 19:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Didn't see Woltmade coming. Pretty sure he's Callum's replacement. His bio is 2nd striker and he wears 10 for GER u21.

Think we're after another AAA player before Isak leaves. #nufc

28.08.2025 19:37 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Lmfao

28.08.2025 18:06 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Thought Labour was about ensuring we don't pull the ladder up afterwards?

29.05.2025 07:44 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Had an argument with my brother on this point. Right things don't stop being right because the wind blows in the wrong direction.

16.05.2025 18:17 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Beginning of reality asserting itself

17.04.2025 07:16 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

An excellent piece, the writer is to ve commended

10.04.2025 09:50 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

First time I've heard this - men sacrificing family life. Its a mistake to dismiss it.

The idea that women sacrifice more then men, especially with family life, is not as clear cut as you think. Men would like to spend more their family, in certain circumstances.

27.03.2025 20:46 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

But reelect him you did. And so ye be judged

22.03.2025 22:12 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This ruling, whenever it happens, will be one of the most definitive rulings in US legal history. It will define the limitations of executive power, in a very turbulent context. It needs to be right (bulletproof)

21.03.2025 21:36 β€” πŸ‘ 20    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

We've seen from the Dems in the US even the fundamental problems aren't fixed..and Scholz etc. Voters expect more than being not as bad as yesterday other lot

20.03.2025 21:31 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Think they do the voters a disservice. Improvements in the NHS, and now Defence are priced in. Voters want far, far more than this (noticeable change on the ground).

20.03.2025 21:25 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Is that when sanctions will be considered?

18.03.2025 17:11 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The intellectual paucity of Labour is deflating. They have more in common with Johnson nowadays (run in the direction of the political wind, rather than leading)

15.03.2025 21:32 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

What government? From the UK

14.03.2025 23:11 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Biblical

14.03.2025 22:31 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

V.good, sir

07.03.2025 15:18 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Wouldn't this be the same as Russia stationing in Belarus? The major EU gap is lack of non-strategic nuclear weapons. What is the threshold for these in yhe NPT?

06.03.2025 21:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yep, diluting accountability to protect Musk from prosecution is my bet

06.03.2025 21:01 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This is a fascinating, must read piece on what a European force in Ukraine should consist of

03.03.2025 18:20 β€” πŸ‘ 109    πŸ” 48    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Tbh I'm waiting for the class action suit against Tesla by current Tesla owners ....

02.03.2025 20:52 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@gstadt is following 20 prominent accounts