berserk

She's the CEO of a company with a responsibility to maintain a safe environment for its users. Not only has she not done that, she has openly antagonized those users who, understandably, bring up Bluesky's hypocritical and dangerous policies. Her feelings as a person are immaterial.

Yes, I am screencapping you misunderstanding the situation to such a huge degree that you are talking about the feelings of the CEO of a social media company.

real bad opinions on this all around

"Josh Allen" is such a bad name for a quarterback. He should have changed his name to Thud Cronkite or Master de la Croix.

buddy it's been twelve hours, you missed your chance to be condescending and wrong

grunting every few seconds as I take damage from being in las vegas

Sam Darnold looks exactly like the boyfriend in Midsommar and it's my deepest hope that he one day ends up in a Bears uniform

My brain, immediately after posting that: the superhero's name is Rem Lazar

It's a video just called creeps and it has a bunch of men being gross, usually in children's media, and ends with a song with a blue haired superhero who has a really weird name I can't remember singing to two children

I think all the time about this. I just want to watch the Creeps video one more time.

Friends is derivative of Seinfeld, so no, but I would also accept "White Living Single."

One time someone on Twitter accused me of antisemitism for referring to Friends as "Christian Seinfeld"

we're one scene in and already this movie is radiating John Woo stink lines (complimentary)

nw The Killer (1989)

This is what the Brits like

an old English guy who's furious that so many Brits are cheering for the Vikings

Are you talking about the person who uses the r-word but wants you to stop being mean to computers, or the person arguing that being mean to computers reinforces racist thought patterns? Neither is arguing in good faith.

We should be more charitable to one another, and kinder, and humbler. How you talk about AI has nothing to do with that, and we are not entering some benighted age of online behavior.

This is, frankly, an incredible thing to say if you experienced any amount of the Internet in the early 2000s.

I said that almost verbatim and you argued that the LLM industry's dogshit reasoning models "mirror" how humans think

OpenAI's new reasoning AI models hallucinate more | TechCrunch OpenAI's reasoning AI models are getting better, but their hallucinating isn't, according to benchmark results.

OpenAI's advanced reasoning models hallucinate ~40% of the time.

techcrunch.com/2025/04/18/o...

No it isn't. Thread over.

For the third time,

I already did, my man

bsky.app/profile/wors...

That's not how scientific discourse works. What humans are is well-established. You're promoting a radical and unsupported theory for how the human mind works and it's on you to provide evidence supporting your idea.

"duhhh you made a claim so you have to back it up"

I have cognition. I can evaluate information. I can synthesize it. I can develop new ideas. I can - wordlessly - do things within the physical world that I can reference later when thinking about other things. LLMs cannot do these things.

He's an example of the difference between humans and LLMs. Despite reading posts and articles from literally thousands of charlatans claiming AI is sentient or has the ability to be sentient, I have evaluated that data and found it to be complete horseshit.

Great, now use this fascinating ability to "compare" things on LLMs and humans