race also follows the same dynamicโpeople not actively being racist and judging them for being racist is just as much of an existential threat to their social order as men who donโt hate women are
03.11.2025 05:33 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0@apparatchikwannabe.bsky.social
he/him History is a nightmare from which I am trying to awake.
race also follows the same dynamicโpeople not actively being racist and judging them for being racist is just as much of an existential threat to their social order as men who donโt hate women are
03.11.2025 05:33 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0/where a massive portion of society is comprised of people to whom these old values are not โthe normalโ but in fact seen as actively awful, which poses an existential threat to the future of their entire value system, because we will, some day, suppress their traditions in the name of freedom.
03.11.2025 05:31 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 0in order to free the individual we have had to, very limitedly relative to what must be done, chip away at the oldest tyrant of all, the Father-Husband, the closest thing we have ever made to God. this destabilizes everything, it allows people to break the cycle, and weโve hit a critical point/
03.11.2025 05:31 โ ๐ 6 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0a lot of this has always existedโit was simply that many less people had been broken free, so nothing was visibly wrong since everyone was in. the way of life was not under threat, so solidarity, community, were possible while defending the order. the fulfillment of liberalism has broken this
03.11.2025 05:28 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0they know, deep down, that the only way to maintain the unbroken chain of nightmare that they have been raised to perpetuate is to prevent anyone from ever standing outside of it and looking back.
03.11.2025 05:19 โ ๐ 14 ๐ 2 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0they care about pushing their horrific lifestyle as the One True Way because they understand the power of judgement. they know that whenever we lift the veil on their traditions we find only abuse and misery, and they have to ask themselves, every time, if we are right. this is worse than death.
03.11.2025 05:16 โ ๐ 13 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0more than that, the reason they cannot stand this is because they cannot stand the idea of being judged. the thing that makes them feel oppressed is the fact that we are free to dislike them.
03.11.2025 05:13 โ ๐ 17 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0it is not remarked upon enough that these guys just genuinely and sincerely hate america and hate americans
03.11.2025 03:04 โ ๐ 2530 ๐ 507 ๐ฌ 68 ๐ 16yes sir we've found a perfect candidate, but first I should tell you, he's a duck, which obviously presents some qualification issues, but he makes an incredible milkshake
03.11.2025 03:05 โ ๐ 203 ๐ 33 ๐ฌ 4 ๐ 0please god can Omaha and KC et al go off like blueberry thermonuclear weapons
02.11.2025 21:51 โ ๐ 151 ๐ 9 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 1Just as a complete aside, it is always very funny to me that the US government calls the department that manufactures nuclear weapons โthe Department of energyโ, like that is an incredible bit
03.11.2025 01:55 โ ๐ 98 ๐ 8 ๐ฌ 10 ๐ 3The right has correctly identified the professional-managerial class as the class with the most revolutionary potential in the current period and have directed all their energies to destroy it before it becomes aware of itself and its own power
03.11.2025 01:57 โ ๐ 221 ๐ 40 ๐ฌ 4 ๐ 1the real horror of foreign policy is realizing that the people involved actually do believe in things after all
03.11.2025 01:04 โ ๐ 160 ๐ 23 ๐ฌ 6 ๐ 1anyways, barring positive documentary evidence, the oil thesis remains entirely speculative and unsupported.
03.11.2025 01:06 โ ๐ 53 ๐ 2 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0willing and eager to put his oil on the international market, and global oil companies were happy to purchase it without a war.
Moreover, Iraq's major oil contracts after the war went to America's strategic rivals, not US companies. Real brilliant plan if the war was about oil.
This is an incredibly tenacious myth about the Iraq War, pushed relentlessly by the Jacobin-y left.
But there's no evidence for it. No evidence that policy-makers had oil as even a secondary or tertiary motive for invading.
And it would make zero sense to do this, as Saddam was perfectly/
absolutely hallucinatory man they really memory-holed her entire campaign
02.11.2025 06:30 โ ๐ 679 ๐ 60 ๐ฌ 36 ๐ 16The first 3: definitely not about oil.
03.11.2025 00:53 โ ๐ 141 ๐ 17 ๐ฌ 5 ๐ 5The story of civil rights is that African Americans were integrated into existing democratic urban machine politics and then took over/created their own machines over time
02.11.2025 22:50 โ ๐ 226 ๐ 26 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Mentioned this before, but I often wonder how much conservative gender-anxiety is just aversion to complexity and if maybe theyโd be totally fine with like six different gender identifies if they were clearly defined and harshly policed. Real gender centrism has never been tried.
02.11.2025 17:36 โ ๐ 310 ๐ 25 ๐ฌ 11 ๐ 10the soviet unionโs great power was that they had an economy that wasnโt a ponzi scheme. the nazi myth is that they were doing โhuman wavesโ and just sacrificing troops uselessly because โasiatic hordesโ. this is false, they used their superiority effectively and strategically to win.
02.11.2025 20:35 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0the ussr did field more troops than the axis, and more tanks, and more guns, they did this because they were better resourced and better at procuring shit (including from the us) that was โgood enoughโ rather than having 10 slightly different versions of the same tank
02.11.2025 20:32 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0So it is not great that we're going to lose four entire years preparing for this new reality because the SecDef is a TV host who has never moved beyond the one war he knows but does not understand (the GWOT) and does not have the mental acuity to remotely encompass the scope of his own job.
02.11.2025 19:26 โ ๐ 201 ๐ 16 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 0But *fundamentally* Big Boy War is won with spreadsheets, it is won with production, it is won with research and development.
Troop training and fitness matter, but on the margins. In WWII, we buried the better men in steel; the USSR buried them in just more men.
Spreadsheets win wars.
Over three administrations now (Trump, Biden, Trump) the consensus has been that Big Boy War Is Back. But none of these administrations - nor the DoD - has been willing to face down what that actually *means* because the changes would be uncomfortable.
So we say BBW is back, but pretend it isn't.
Russia burned off more than 4,000 tanks, 8,000 IFVs, 300 manned aircraft (fixed and rotor), more than 2,000 self-propelled heavy systems (art, rocket, AA, etc) fighting a defiant, brave, doughty but fundamentally third-string power in Ukraine.
A Big Boy War would be Bigger. Much Bigger.
"If you want a picture of the future of war, imagine a guy jumping through a flaming hoop to assuage the masculinity-anxiety of his boss - forever."
02.11.2025 19:11 โ ๐ 550 ๐ 84 ๐ฌ 17 ๐ 5side point but the idea that if you make a human grade robot intellect it will do whatever you say without protest seems underexamined
02.11.2025 17:37 โ ๐ 459 ๐ 56 ๐ฌ 20 ๐ 10the thing we don't see about the "are we the baddies" Mitchell & Webb sketch is when that Nazi realizes that, since he's the baddie, he needs to fight extra hard because the people on the other side *definitely* know he's the baddie
02.11.2025 17:56 โ ๐ 18 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0the thing that really stands out to me about the right right now is that they're *scared* because they actually understand that if they fail to dehumanize all the groups they hate, they will be driven out of society. they're completely right that they're hated, and they know they deserve it.
02.11.2025 17:55 โ ๐ 40 ๐ 10 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 0