✨110% Unbiased ✨

FAA Won't Share Data Justifying Flight Cuts, Airline Executives Skeptical The FAA is refusing to share the data being used to justify flight cuts across the country, amid concerns that the decision may be political.

FAA Won’t Share Data Justifying Flight Cuts, Airline Executives Skeptical
onemileatatime.com/news/faa-dat...

I understand why we shut down American airspace for a few days after 9-11 to avoid a repeat attack but imagine shutting down American airspace to avoid releasing the Epstein files.

There’s some ideas that I can feel but haven’t been able to verbalize and I love it when someone else has figured it out.

Because the whole conservative argument lately seems to be - disagreeing with me makes me right and no I don’t have to have reasons.

oh yeah. what could be more challenging than being a Catholic conservative white lady at Notre Dame Law?

HHS did just fire Steven Hatfill

But her emails

a black and white illustration of a woman riding a bicycle over another woman who has fallen off her bicycle. both women are wearing full gowns and hats. a caption on the illustration says “DOES THE BICYCLE MAKE WOMEN CRUEL?”

nytimes logging on to do some bike commentary

Amazing the average still isn’t below 40.

Trump has accused boat crews of being narco-terrorists. The truth, AP found, is more nuanced One was a fisherman struggling to eke out a living on $100 a month. Another was a career criminal. A third was a former military cadet.

AP reporter Regina Garcia Cano looked into a few of the men killed in Trump's extrajudicial strikes on Caribbean boats.

"They were laborers, a fisherman, a taxi driver. Two were low-level career criminals. One was a local crime boss who contracted out smuggling services"

apnews.com/article/trum...

What’s the difference between knee jerk reaction and knee jerk polling?

Filling the commissary with branded alcohol while service members go without pay and are encouraged to contact local food pantries is so fucking crazy.

You’re inherently valuing dishonesty by pushing for change based on temporary lie based boosts.

Does everyone follow politics closely to know every issue intimately? No, of course not. Will people start to pay attention and notice big lies once issues start to affect them? Of course.

There was nothing knee-jerk about seeing huge problems with the Iraq war. Cheney had said it would be a disaster, they weren’t tied to 9/11, they weren’t providing clear evidence for cause.

That’s what some of the problem is with just flash polling on which party is doing the best advertising

if you thought Tesla was propped up by lies and bubblegum now, woo baby you ain’t seen nothing yet

the jury nullification take is wrong. If that’s what had happened they wouldn’t have sent a note to the judge asking for definitions of relevant terms.

They just didn’t think he did the crime after considering the evidence and following the given instructions.

Don’t charge sandwich cases.

Instead of pretending that in was coincidence thy all of a sudden all the Trump people deciding to do the ok sign at the same time as a bunch of 4chan Nazis it would have been a fine time to cut the nonsense off 10 years ago.

That paper just seems like social science?

Maybe he’s saying some generic conservative and not him. But he’s not pushing back he’s expanding her argument past the point she took it to say not only are men more important if there rocket scientists but capitalism in general necessitates a male energy of telling newborns and new moms to F off

Leah tried to make a point that some jobs don’t have room for kids (rockets exploding) and he tries to expand that argument beyond that to car dealerships, or that’s what it sounds like to me since he invokes conservatives in general. And that paternity leaves endangers competitiveness.

Of course there’s real financial concerns in people taking leaves of absence and still needing payment. But I think it’s a bit silly to suggest men are all on some time crunch and about to launch a rocket so can’t take off or that they don’t benefit a lot from paternity leave.

There was no rocket to the moon that was dependent on him. Something that rarely happens. We want to pretend the world will stop if we pause work for a month, it won’t. He has a plenty important job but he was able to take more time off at other places and it was fine and better for everyone

I just don’t understand how a man with children can argue this. While I don’t disagree that I needed the time for physical recovery and baby care my husband had various time off for each of our kids and more time is vastly superior for men. For one kid he only had 3 days of sick leave, it stunk

Ellis rejects the DOJ's argument that plaintiffs are not protected by the First Amendment because they've "intermingled themselves with rioters."

"The unlawful activity by a few protesters does not transform a peaceful assembly into an unlawful assembly," Ellis says

Name a problem that people can see is real…..we have no guaranteed paid maternity leave and then be real squirmy of what the solution to that is. Problem is if it’s paid leave, democrats have fought for that, which leaves the question, what’s her actual solution if she’s claiming that’s not good.

Sargent is trying to pull some moderate position. But seemingly can’t decide if there should be more pregnancy and care & recovery protections in the workplace or that we should just accept women can’t work bc they had babies and tha would be burdensome to the workplace. It’s the judo move of

I guess it’s a step up for the NYT to just give their occasional how annoying are the women article to conservatives instead of pretending Steven Pinker’s turns of phrase are science.

I think she’s arguing there that maternity leave is a burden for small companies but not as much for large companies? I’m unsure why her arguments though would tie her to republicans which have stymied family leave policies at every turn www.oah.org/tah/november...

If thy had their way they’d probably change the voting age to 25 and let parents be their surrogate voters until then.

While kids grow up and get a vote, it’s not surprising that the right wing version of enfranchising a young population isn’t to give them the vote at 16 years old but as a 16 year old have someone else vote in their name.