Does anyone know if the new arena plans include refurbishing Pimisi Station with a design to better manage large crowds?
19.05.2025 20:01 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@dmuddiman.bsky.social
๐Ottawa
Does anyone know if the new arena plans include refurbishing Pimisi Station with a design to better manage large crowds?
19.05.2025 20:01 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Yes yes, the operating costs would add to the transit deficit, but this could be part of a multi-pronged campaign to win back some ridership.
Invite residents to try to transit for their 2025 New Yearโs resolution.
(if only more could be done about reliability, like more bus lanes, nudge nudge)
Exactly - instead of providing โfreeโ (voucher required) transit to a subgroup, why not take the holiday season opportunity to just make transit free for all users. Easier to administer too.
Hosting the World Juniors, a once-every-15-years event, is something the whole city could celebrate.
Itโs likely too late, but seeing the free transit initiative for ticketholders for the World Juniors, from Dec 19 to Jan 5.
Why not just make transit free entirely for this period?
Encourages a safer and more responsible transportation option in a time of year when impaired driving rates go up.
It would also be a positive safety measure that encourages use of a safer and more responsible transportation option during a time of year when increased rates of impaired driving are, unfortunately, a thing.
18.12.2024 21:02 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Why not free transit service across the board from Dec 19 to Jan 5?
Not just for ticketholders for the World Juniors (who have to use a video call feature at ticket machines to bypass fare gates at Line 1 stations?)
This summarizes the results of the public comments on Bill 212. Read the last line and weep. Full text here: ero.ontario.ca/notice/019-9...
18.12.2024 19:48 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 6 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0That and the prevailing narratives among detractors seem to be either it wonโt be effective (in diverting enough truck traffic), or it will only โโmove the problem to another neighborhoodโ (so, it will be effective?)
17.12.2024 18:21 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0A sixth bridge crossing consistently slips off the local priority list because I think supporting it sucks up even more political capital than Stage 3 LRT or dedicated bus lanes on Baseline/Bank/Carling/Montreal, in terms of congestion-reducing initiatives.
17.12.2024 18:19 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0When the Kichi Zibi Mikan lane reductions end west of Dominion (bringing it back to two lanes per direction), make one lane per direction a bus lane to give some congestion relief to the 31 bus routes that use this stretch of the parkway.
The single lanes have been brutal for these routes!
What tactics will OC Transpo deploy to not only keep existing ridership, but also entice 10-16K people to commit to transit?
How many Riverside South residents will adopt Line 2 for their regular commute?
5,000,000 new trips / 150 work days per year (3 days per week RTO) / 2 trips per work day = 16,666 new riders.
Adjust the assumption to 250 work days per year (5 days per week RTO) gets you to 10,000 new riders.
To help reach fare revenue targets, Ottawaโs transit budget for 2025 is counting on an increase in ridership from 73 million trips in 2024 to ~78 million trips in 2025.
That means OC Transpo needs 10,000 to 16,666 new people to choose transit for their regular commute in 2025.
Napkin math below
Thanks!
13.12.2024 15:10 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Thanks for this post, lots of interesting numbers to digest.
โIn 2019, Ottawaโs projected transit ridership for 2025 was 125.8-million trips.โ
!!!
Where can I find this stat?
And do you have any idea what the new ridership projection is for, say 2030, and what the plan is to get there?
โthe monthly cost of social housing is $613. This is starkly lower than $2,100 for a shelter bed, $4,300 for a correctional facility bed, $13,500 for a hospital bed. Housing people is not only a moral imperative but also an economically sound decision.โ Kathy Moreland RN #onpoli
09.12.2024 00:15 โ ๐ 258 ๐ 139 ๐ฌ 12 ๐ 6Like that the article highlighted that risk aversion can lead to political concessions that increase costs.
Creates a vicious cycle that in turn undermines the โtransit consensusโ (that transit is worth the investment, period) which leads to more risk aversion, more concessions, then higher costs.
โUnderstanding the Drivers of Transit Construction Costs in Canada: A Comparative Studyโ
Lots of good stuff in this article.
Thanks to @taras-grescoe.com for sharing and authors @jedwin.bsky.social @chittimarco.bsky.social Balthazar Crane & Amer Shalaby
Specifically what elements did the community want to be consulted on here thatโs causing so much uproar?
And what are the opponents proposing as an alternative?
Screenshot of text from the 2024 Annual Report of the Auditor General of Ontario, which lists several bulleted paragraphs that summarize the reportโs findings with respect to the Ontario governmentโs decision to change supervised consumption services without proper planning, impact analysis, or public consultation.
More from todayโs Ontario AG report:
โUnlike CTS sites, these Hubs will not provide some key harm-reduction services, such as supervised consumption or needle exchange, despite the fact that these services have been proven to prevent overdose deaths.โ
www.auditor.on.ca/en/content/a...
Ontario Place redevelopment now estimated at $2.2-billion as Auditor-General notes โirregularโ bid process: The audit concludes that the process used to select Therme for the Ontario Place site was not โfair, transparent or accountable to all participantsโ as required by the provinceโs own rulesโฆ
03.12.2024 15:59 โ ๐ 73 ๐ 42 ๐ฌ 8 ๐ 19Ridiculous take: Metcalfe St should be widened/realigned so that it lines up symmetrically with the Peace Tower, Centennial Flame, and Museum of Nature, creating a clear sight line between the museum and Centre block. Ottawaโs own little Champs-รlysรฉes.
02.12.2024 03:36 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0People riding in a safe bike-lane in downtown Vancouver
You donโt have to be a โcyclistโ to support safe bike infrastructure in your city. You donโt have to ride bikes at all. You just have to understand the FACT that bike infrastructure makes getting around easier & safer for EVERYONE, saves us all public money, & makes cities generally more successful.
29.11.2024 20:07 โ ๐ 1147 ๐ 268 ๐ฌ 17 ๐ 27For 2023-24 the announced amount for Ottawa was $33,061,834.
For 2022-23 it was $37,804,511.
Ottawa transit funding question:
Where does the Ontario Dedicated Public Transit Fund fit into the Budget 2025 conversation?
This legislated funding (passed in 2013) brought Ottawa $30m+ in 2022-23 and 2023-24.
Has the city already accounted for this funding and asking for $18m in addition?
This is an excellent documentary on transit woes in Ottawa, and I don't just say that because I'm in it. www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPaO...
28.11.2024 23:29 โ ๐ 22 ๐ 11 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 0"What we see here is a contest over what informs transportation and infrastructure policy: either that irritated feeling you get when youโre stuck in traffic, or actual data-driven evidence."
My first op-ed, with the wonderful @sarahelton.bsky.social!
It appears the city is also working on brick-and-mortar solutions, including a converted retirement home, a converted office tower downtown, a closed convent in Orleans, and the Taggart Family YMCA.
My guess is these retrofis wonโt be ready fast enough, but are part of a multi-pronged approach.
Hi Nancy, the answers to your questions can be found in these places:
www.seandevine.ca/newcomer_rec...
ottawa.ca/en/city-hall...
engage.ottawa.ca/newcomer-rec...
If Ontario were to bring Ottawaโs per resident transit subsidy up to the provincial average of $112.16 per resident (still well below Torontoโs subsidy), then we should actually expect $80m from the province.
Instead, the City is asking for $18m from the province.