Martha Gimbel's Avatar

Martha Gimbel

@marthagimbel.bsky.social

Sometimes Econ, sometimes rants, sometimes both. Current Budget Lab at Yale, former CEA, JEC, DOL, SF, Indeed.

7,025 Followers  |  235 Following  |  204 Posts  |  Joined: 03.07.2023
Posts Following

Posts by Martha Gimbel (@marthagimbel.bsky.social)

Preview
AI + work: Understanding AI’s impact on the labor market - The Hamilton Project On March 10, the Budget Lab at Yale, The Hamilton Project, and Peterson Institute for International Economics will host an event on AI’s impact on the labor market.

What do we know about AI’s impact on the labor market? On March 10, Peter Orszag, @jedkolko.bsky.social, @marthagimbel.bsky.social, Bharat Chandar, and
@bencasselman.bsky.social an.bsky.social
will dive into the data and what we know: www.hamiltonproject.org/event/unders...

04.03.2026 20:20 — 👍 7    🔁 2    💬 1    📌 1
Preview
AI + work: Understanding AI’s impact on the labor market - The Hamilton Project On March 10, the Budget Lab at Yale, The Hamilton Project, and Peterson Institute for International Economics will host an event on AI’s impact on the labor market.

What do we know about AI’s impact on the labor market? On March 10, Peter Orszag, @jedkolko.bsky.social, @marthagimbel.bsky.social, Bharat Chandar, and @bencasselman.bsky.social will dive into the data and what we know:

03.03.2026 14:56 — 👍 4    🔁 3    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
AI + work: Understanding AI’s impact on the labor market - The Hamilton Project On March 10, the Budget Lab at Yale, The Hamilton Project, and Peterson Institute for International Economics will host an event on AI’s impact on the labor market.

Really looking forward to this event, in which we'll try to tackle one of the most important questions in the economy right now: What does A.I. mean for the labor market, both now and in the near future?
Join us next week!
www.hamiltonproject.org/event/unders... #EconSky

03.03.2026 14:33 — 👍 16    🔁 11    💬 1    📌 2

Just so the Econ crew is aware - the homeowner here is Leo Feler

27.10.2025 00:56 — 👍 14    🔁 5    💬 0    📌 1

If you know someone who might fit the bill - please send them our way! Happy to answer any questions.

06.10.2025 14:09 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Hi all! We're still waiting on the official posting - but @budgetlab.bsky.social is looking for a new macro hire to add to our team! We're agnostic on level (Recent PhD, decades of experience, MA+ research experience, who knows?) - we care more about flexible thinking and curiosity

06.10.2025 14:09 — 👍 21    🔁 6    💬 1    📌 1

My take is: Did we lose exactly 30k jobs in September? Almost certainly not. Did we lose some jobs in September? Plausibly! Did we add enough jobs in September to keep up with population growth? Seems quite unlikely.

01.10.2025 15:56 — 👍 6    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
AI is not killing jobs, US study finds Research shows little evidence that cutting-edge tech such as chatbots is putting people out of work

And thanks to Claire Jones and @financialtimes.com for the coverage: www.ft.com/content/c9f9...

01.10.2025 15:54 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Evaluating the Impact of AI on the Labor Market: Current State of Affairs

The full piece is here, please give it and all of its many many graphs a read budgetlab.yale.edu/research/eva...

01.10.2025 15:54 — 👍 7    🔁 2    💬 1    📌 0

Thanks to @mollykinder.bsky.social @brookings.edu for being such wonderful partners on this and to Josh and Maddie for objectively doing all the work

01.10.2025 15:54 — 👍 1    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

We plan to update this every month (assuming we get the CPS microdata!) and also to adjust our methodology in response to feedback/new data on usage/exposure. /end

01.10.2025 15:54 — 👍 2    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

The lack of widespread impacts at this early stage is not unlike the pace of change with previous periods of technological change. Preregistering areas where we would expect to see the impact and continuing to monitor monthly impacts will help us distinguish rumor from fact. 14/

01.10.2025 15:54 — 👍 1    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

While generative AI looks likely to join the ranks of transformative, general purpose technologies, it is too soon to tell how disruptive the technology will be to jobs. 13/

01.10.2025 15:54 — 👍 1    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

While anxiety over the effects of AI on today’s labor market is widespread, our data suggests it remains largely speculative. The picture of AI’s impact on the labor market that emerges from our data is one that largely reflects stability, not yet major disruption. 12/

01.10.2025 15:54 — 👍 1    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

We should note that data in this space is still imperfect, and usage/exposure is still evolving. Here is a comparison of OpenAI and Anthropic's measures of exposure and usage for instance 11/

01.10.2025 15:54 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

And also duration of unemployment 10/

01.10.2025 15:54 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

We see a similar story using Anthropic's usage data for both automation and augmentation in employment... 9/

01.10.2025 15:54 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

And more exposed workers aren't accounting for a greater share of longer-term unemployed workers 8/

01.10.2025 15:54 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

So far there's no sign that relatively more exposure to AI is at all impacting the share of employment in those occupations 7/

01.10.2025 15:54 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

We then look at employment shares and unemployment by duration among workers who are more or less exposed to AI (according to OpenAI) and whose occupations have more or less usage (automated or augmented) according to Anthropic 6/

01.10.2025 15:54 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

If we look at how similar the occupational mix of recent college graduates is to slightly older college graduates - there may be some sign that the difference is growing? But that could be due to 1) noise 2) non-AI factors (such as a slowing labor market), not just AI 5/

01.10.2025 15:54 — 👍 4    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

In fact, taking a closer look at recent years, the data suggests that this recent trend is not necessarily attributable to AI (Figure 2). Shifts in the occupational mix were well on their way during 2021. 4/

01.10.2025 15:54 — 👍 4    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

Although recent trends seemingly outpace historical shifts in the occupational mix, the potential effects of AI on the labor market so far are not out of the ordinary. 3/

01.10.2025 15:54 — 👍 4    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

First, we look at how quickly the overall occupational mix is changing. The job mix for AI appears to be changing faster than it has in the past, although not markedly so. BUT... 2/

01.10.2025 15:54 — 👍 5    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

New from me @mollykinder.bsky.social Josh Kendall and Maddie Lee: how should we be tracking the impact of AI on the labor market? Tldr: no signs of major disruptions yet, but we plan to update our trackers monthly 1/

01.10.2025 15:54 — 👍 21    🔁 8    💬 2    📌 3
01.10.2025 15:46 — 👍 22    🔁 2    💬 2    📌 0

3. "Fine, we'll just rely on private data."
(This one is @marthagimbel.bsky.social bait)
There is lots of private data out there, and we'll be leaning on it heavily during a shutdown. But hardly anyone who has looked closely at these data thinks they can come close to replacing government sources.

30.09.2025 13:42 — 👍 32    🔁 2    💬 1    📌 2
Preview
Upjohn Institute welcomes two new economists Chloe Gibbs and Monique Davis join the research team

We’re excited to officially welcome‪ @chloergibbs.bsky.social and @moniqueedavis-phd.bsky.social to the Upjohn Institute research team! Chloe brings deep expertise in education policy, while Monique’s research explores systemic inequality in economic outcomes. #EconSky

01.08.2025 14:02 — 👍 43    🔁 4    💬 0    📌 3
Video thumbnail

Fed Fight: It’s Trump vs Jerome Powell. Why an Independent Fed matters @chafkin.bsky.social and I talk with @marthagimbel.bsky.social this week on Everybody’s Business from @businessweektr.bsky.social @bloomberg.com

#jeromepowell #federalreserve #economy

20.07.2025 00:36 — 👍 6    🔁 3    💬 0    📌 0

cordelia is arguably the first mentally well person in the history of literature

10.07.2025 23:48 — 👍 18    🔁 3    💬 3    📌 0