Catherine Royle's Avatar

Catherine Royle

@catheriner.bsky.social

Principal of Somerville College Oxford. Recovering British diplomat & former Ambassador. Worked for NATO too. Here with my own views. Think we can do better in our world

243 Followers  |  281 Following  |  52 Posts  |  Joined: 03.11.2023  |  2.1358

Latest posts by catheriner.bsky.social on Bluesky


Ok but you need a DSACEUR who is empowered. SACEUR/COM EUCOM spends a lot of time on his US job and this delays decisions in NATO.

27.01.2026 17:15 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

They should ask him about last week’s events to see if he has caught up or still knows nothing

27.01.2026 08:31 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Can we spend more on diplomacy and soft power too?
V cheap by comparison to defence and helps avoid armed conflict

19.01.2026 12:24 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I see some sense in letting Europe take the lead.

19.01.2026 10:53 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

A 2 tier Europe could help UKR, UK, NOR, Iceland others?

16.01.2026 05:58 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

HMG is cutting diplomacy and soft power eg British Council too. What can possibly go wrong?

11.01.2026 12:57 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Seems like a good moment to ensure our foreign policy effort is properly funded and staffed rather than cutting FCDO yet again. If you don’t spend in diplomacy, you end up spending on bullets and with lives

08.01.2026 08:28 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Very confused as to why US needs to take over Greenland to defend its interests. Don’t remember it taking over West Germany to do that during the Cold War. I think that’s the point of the Alliance called NATO.

07.01.2026 08:26 β€” πŸ‘ 61    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

I’m more worried about Greenland because of what it means for NATO etc. But leaders Iran and Cuba should both be uncomfortable

06.01.2026 08:01 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

🚨🚨EMERGENCY EPISODE🚨🚨
Very few people can claim to have met and known πŸ‡»πŸ‡ͺ's Maduro, Chavez & interim president Delcy Rodriguez. Well, my guest @catheriner.bsky.social, former πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ ambassador in Caracas, is one of them and she spoke to me earlier today.
podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/b...

04.01.2026 23:04 β€” πŸ‘ 207    πŸ” 116    πŸ’¬ 14    πŸ“Œ 27

She didn’t have to start by ruling out customs union or freedom of movement given the narrow result and what was said before the referendum. She put her party before her country

09.10.2025 15:25 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

And of course no mention of the human cost - the Argentines now using soup and community kitchens, out of work or whose pensions are now worthless.

08.10.2025 06:45 β€” πŸ‘ 23    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

A man who has never done anything to make anything better so easy to shout down and ask stupid questions . β€œLet’s have a bet”about tax rises. Get real

01.10.2025 07:25 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

When will #r4today learn we don’t want the attack dog gotcha stuff we want grown up discussion of v complex problems. Grow up Robinson

01.10.2025 07:23 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Moneyboxes next?

26.09.2025 01:37 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It’s not an easy set of circumstances. I really hope you’re right that this is the plan.

15.09.2025 09:00 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

To be fair no-one else has much idea either as we have seen since 2014. Or perhaps they know, but are not willing to do it. The risk of RUS using nukes has hovered over everything since 2022. Small risk maybe. But a risk nonetheless. Poor Ukraine.

20.08.2025 08:54 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Great read. Interested in what the few women had to say about why there were there. Does the lack of women mean there is still hope of an outbreak of sanity?

09.08.2025 17:02 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

A very good listen. Rory sounded shell shocked to be confronted with inequality being the biggest problem in the UK economy. And seemed to think we could just ape the US. Haven’t we tried that - and failed?

28.07.2025 08:45 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Can’t we aim for sooner? And in all rivers and seas? And if we can’t nationalise can we have contracts that include stopping leaks and building reservoirs as well as banning dividends and bonuses if contracts are breached?

20.07.2025 10:19 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Trojan Horse anyone?

26.06.2025 13:53 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Generous. If everything in the world ran to a bossa nova beat it would probably be less aggressive

18.06.2025 09:15 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Someone needs to tell MoD that they can’t do their stuff without an effective FCDO. Deterrence and conflict are tools to manage political and diplomatic issues. In the end everything is political. And that isn’t MoD’s competence

12.06.2025 12:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Nothing against increasing defence spending- although the hard bit is spending it well. But.. the biggest danger is that Russia wins without fighting. Let’s tighten rules on political donations, curb the flow of dirty money, restrict foreign ownership of media, protect our democracy & institutions

11.06.2025 07:20 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I would start with believing in evolution

10.06.2025 15:54 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Of course. But v few people understand what diplomats do - and what good diplomacy can prevent. It’s a skill set that is not v visible - for good reason. But we need to find a way to talk about it

07.06.2025 21:32 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The Diplomatic Service is also underfunded and undervalued. If we want to avoid war rather than fight, then we need to invest in diplomacy. That’s security too

07.06.2025 18:26 β€” πŸ‘ 27    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Question for the history buffs. Is Trump 2 more like the dissolution of the monasteries or the Chinese Cultural Revolution of 1967?

23.05.2025 12:47 β€” πŸ‘ 14    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

But our royals are German…

20.05.2025 20:22 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This was not a calamity. No one died. Lots of people were inconvenienced - including me. Businesses lost money. That’s it

23.03.2025 08:46 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@catheriner is following 20 prominent accounts