Wanna write a meta-analysis error report? matthewbjane.quarto.pub/meta-analysi...
28.06.2025 00:22 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@matthewbjane.bsky.social
PhD student | Quantitative Psychology, UConn | Applied Statistics & Meta-Analysis | Reposts and follows are not endorsements. | Advisor: Blair T. Johnson | matthewbjane.com
Wanna write a meta-analysis error report? matthewbjane.quarto.pub/meta-analysi...
28.06.2025 00:22 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Update on Error Report #2: The impact of acoustic stimulation during sleep on memory and sleep architecture: A meta-analysis
The article has been retracted by agreement with the journal editor and authors #metascience
"Meta-meta-analyses trade precision & rigor for expediency. If your aim is rigor, there’s no substitute for doing the hard work."
Preach!
I once read a #meta-analysis that mistook SE for SD. Since then I am suspicious of all such studies.
Do the hard work!
matthewbjane.github.io/blog-posts/b...
This is very nice from @matthewbjane.bsky.social as to why umbrella reviews are basically useless (sorry!), essentially because they compound up the issues with the meta analyses they include. I have the same concerns but articulate them less eloquently. matthewbjane.github.io/blog-posts/b...
25.05.2025 09:24 — 👍 17 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 2No a meta-meta-analysis-analysis
24.05.2025 16:00 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0I think my reaction to the first time I saw it was something along the lines of “wait you can just do that?”
24.05.2025 11:44 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I've moaned about meta-analyses of meta-analyses for a while and had several interesting experiences reviewing them... Now I can save time and just send people to Matt's post to explain why not to do them.
24.05.2025 08:40 — 👍 11 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0Yeah I might do that. Maybe I’ll make it into a pre-print for now
24.05.2025 02:57 — 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Happy Friday everyone! I just posted what I think is an important blog post on my website. It is a critique of meta-meta-analyses: meta-analyses of meta-analyses.
Link: matthewbjane.github.io/blog-posts/b...
#stats #metascience
Happy Friday everyone! I just posted what I think is an important blog post on my website. It is a critique of meta-meta-analyses: meta-analyses of meta-analyses.
Link: matthewbjane.github.io/blog-posts/b...
#stats #metascience
I’ve been hearing it’s good. No spoilers please, still gotta watch it
23.05.2025 15:24 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Most meta-analyses are bad, some are useful
29.04.2025 17:30 — 👍 17 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0I'm calling for a total and complete shutdown of JAMA Pediatrics until we can figure out what is going on goodscience.substack.com/p/the-resear... I mean, come ON
29.04.2025 12:45 — 👍 181 🔁 47 💬 11 📌 14(#metascience) A good article by @stuartbuck.bsky.social on the Fluoride and IQ meta-analysis: goodscience.substack.com/p/the-resear.... Summarizes some of the points in our forensic review of it (see the forensic review as a pre-print here: osf.io/preprints/os...). Very nice excerpt below:
28.04.2025 17:01 — 👍 7 🔁 5 💬 1 📌 0We tried to. Best we can do for now is submit to meta-psychology and post a pub-peer comment
25.04.2025 14:24 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Nah y’all are right.
24.04.2025 11:48 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0When a STALT error messes up your pagination.
24.04.2025 01:52 — 👍 11 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 0Error Report #4: matthewbjane.quarto.pub/meta-analysi...
The meta-analysis on Fluoride and IQ by Taylor et al (2025) is methodologically flawed and has data integrity issues. The full report by me, @jamesheathers.bsky.social, and @drg.bsky.social is on OSF: osf.io/preprints/os...
#metascience
What does the pin emoji do?
24.04.2025 00:35 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Error Report #4: matthewbjane.quarto.pub/meta-analysi...
The meta-analysis on Fluoride and IQ by Taylor et al (2025) is methodologically flawed and has data integrity issues. The full report by me, @jamesheathers.bsky.social, and @drg.bsky.social is on OSF: osf.io/preprints/os...
#metascience
Don’t do it
23.04.2025 19:42 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Spent the past couple days looking at meta-analyses in body comp literature to get reasonable parameter estimates to use in simulations for a study we're planning and really trying to avoid giving myself a to-do list of meta-analyses that I need to correct/redo 🙃 cc: @matthewbjane.bsky.social
17.04.2025 08:01 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 2 📌 1livefreeordichotomize.com by @lucystats.bsky.social
matthewbjane.github.io/blog.html by @matthewbjane.bsky.social
www.andrewheiss.com/blog/ by the king @andrew.heiss.phd
ngreifer.github.io/blog/ by yours truly (can't resist a self-promotion 😉)
Stats blogs are the best!
Coding RCTs for a meta-analysis…
11.04.2025 17:18 — 👍 36 🔁 3 💬 3 📌 0The meta-analysis on the relationship between Fluoride and IQ by Taylor et al. (2025) that RFK Jr. has cited contains major methodological flaws and data integrity issues that we describe in the following pre-print (submitted to meta-psychology): osf.io/preprints/os...
08.04.2025 16:58 — 👍 95 🔁 56 💬 5 📌 8Another great meta-science contribution by @matthewbjane.bsky.social and others.
This and his re-analysis of the “social media causes harm” meta-analysis are great examples of how we can use science to serve society without necessarily having to be “activists”
The notorious MBJ and his crew are at it again! 🔥 🔥
#RStats #PyData #Stats #EconSky #DataBS
The meta-analysis on the relationship between Fluoride and IQ by Taylor et al. (2025) that RFK Jr. has cited contains major methodological flaws and data integrity issues that we describe in the following pre-print (submitted to meta-psychology): osf.io/preprints/os...
08.04.2025 18:02 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Here is the link to our pub-peer comment pubpeer.org/publications...
08.04.2025 17:41 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Most studies in the meta-analysis are no more detailed than the following:
“Area A has low fluoride water levels, Area B has high fluoride water levels, and area A has a higher mean IQ”
No matching or balancing of covariates. Distinct geographic areas differ more than just their fluoride levels.