Matthew B. Jané's Avatar

Matthew B. Jané

@matthewbjane.bsky.social

PhD student | Quantitative Psychology, UConn | Applied Statistics & Meta-Analysis | Reposts and follows are not endorsements. | Advisor: Blair T. Johnson | matthewbjane.com

5,196 Followers  |  321 Following  |  324 Posts  |  Joined: 26.07.2023  |  2.0787

Latest posts by matthewbjane.bsky.social on Bluesky

Meta-Analysis Error Reports

Wanna write a meta-analysis error report? matthewbjane.quarto.pub/meta-analysi...

28.06.2025 00:22 — 👍 5    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Post image

Update on Error Report #2: The impact of acoustic stimulation during sleep on memory and sleep architecture: A meta-analysis

The article has been retracted by agreement with the journal editor and authors #metascience

19.06.2025 21:11 — 👍 8    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
When Evidence Synthesis Obscures: A Critique of Meta-Meta-Analyses – Matthew B. Jané Meta-analyses are often seen as the gold standard of evidence synthesis–systematic, quantitative, and rigorous (at least when done well). So it’s no surprise that some researchers have taken things a ...

"Meta-meta-analyses trade precision & rigor for expediency. If your aim is rigor, there’s no substitute for doing the hard work."

Preach!

I once read a #meta-analysis that mistook SE for SD. Since then I am suspicious of all such studies.

Do the hard work!

matthewbjane.github.io/blog-posts/b...

26.05.2025 05:18 — 👍 4    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0
Preview
When Evidence Synthesis Obscures: A Critique of Meta-Meta-Analyses – Matthew B. Jané Meta-analyses are often seen as the gold standard of evidence synthesis–systematic, quantitative, and rigorous (at least when done well). So it’s no surprise that some researchers have taken things a ...

This is very nice from @matthewbjane.bsky.social as to why umbrella reviews are basically useless (sorry!), essentially because they compound up the issues with the meta analyses they include. I have the same concerns but articulate them less eloquently. matthewbjane.github.io/blog-posts/b...

25.05.2025 09:24 — 👍 17    🔁 3    💬 0    📌 2

No a meta-meta-analysis-analysis

24.05.2025 16:00 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

I think my reaction to the first time I saw it was something along the lines of “wait you can just do that?”

24.05.2025 11:44 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I've moaned about meta-analyses of meta-analyses for a while and had several interesting experiences reviewing them... Now I can save time and just send people to Matt's post to explain why not to do them.

24.05.2025 08:40 — 👍 11    🔁 2    💬 0    📌 0

Yeah I might do that. Maybe I’ll make it into a pre-print for now

24.05.2025 02:57 — 👍 8    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

Happy Friday everyone! I just posted what I think is an important blog post on my website. It is a critique of meta-meta-analyses: meta-analyses of meta-analyses.

Link: matthewbjane.github.io/blog-posts/b...

#stats #metascience

23.05.2025 22:47 — 👍 85    🔁 26    💬 6    📌 4
Post image

Happy Friday everyone! I just posted what I think is an important blog post on my website. It is a critique of meta-meta-analyses: meta-analyses of meta-analyses.

Link: matthewbjane.github.io/blog-posts/b...

#stats #metascience

23.05.2025 22:47 — 👍 85    🔁 26    💬 6    📌 4

I’ve been hearing it’s good. No spoilers please, still gotta watch it

23.05.2025 15:24 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Most meta-analyses are bad, some are useful

29.04.2025 17:30 — 👍 17    🔁 2    💬 0    📌 0
Post image

I'm calling for a total and complete shutdown of JAMA Pediatrics until we can figure out what is going on goodscience.substack.com/p/the-resear... I mean, come ON

29.04.2025 12:45 — 👍 181    🔁 47    💬 11    📌 14
Post image

(#metascience) A good article by @stuartbuck.bsky.social on the Fluoride and IQ meta-analysis: goodscience.substack.com/p/the-resear.... Summarizes some of the points in our forensic review of it (see the forensic review as a pre-print here: osf.io/preprints/os...). Very nice excerpt below:

28.04.2025 17:01 — 👍 7    🔁 5    💬 1    📌 0

We tried to. Best we can do for now is submit to meta-psychology and post a pub-peer comment

25.04.2025 14:24 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Nah y’all are right.

24.04.2025 11:48 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

When a STALT error messes up your pagination.

24.04.2025 01:52 — 👍 11    🔁 3    💬 0    📌 0
Post image Post image Post image

Error Report #4: matthewbjane.quarto.pub/meta-analysi...

The meta-analysis on Fluoride and IQ by Taylor et al (2025) is methodologically flawed and has data integrity issues. The full report by me, @jamesheathers.bsky.social, and @drg.bsky.social is on OSF: osf.io/preprints/os...
#metascience

23.04.2025 21:07 — 👍 69    🔁 22    💬 5    📌 1

What does the pin emoji do?

24.04.2025 00:35 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0
Post image Post image Post image

Error Report #4: matthewbjane.quarto.pub/meta-analysi...

The meta-analysis on Fluoride and IQ by Taylor et al (2025) is methodologically flawed and has data integrity issues. The full report by me, @jamesheathers.bsky.social, and @drg.bsky.social is on OSF: osf.io/preprints/os...
#metascience

23.04.2025 21:07 — 👍 69    🔁 22    💬 5    📌 1

Don’t do it

23.04.2025 19:42 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Spent the past couple days looking at meta-analyses in body comp literature to get reasonable parameter estimates to use in simulations for a study we're planning and really trying to avoid giving myself a to-do list of meta-analyses that I need to correct/redo 🙃 cc: @matthewbjane.bsky.social

17.04.2025 08:01 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 2    📌 1
Preview
Posts | Noah Greifer Statistical Consultant and Programmer

livefreeordichotomize.com by @lucystats.bsky.social

matthewbjane.github.io/blog.html by @matthewbjane.bsky.social

www.andrewheiss.com/blog/ by the king @andrew.heiss.phd

ngreifer.github.io/blog/ by yours truly (can't resist a self-promotion 😉)

Stats blogs are the best!

22.04.2025 18:26 — 👍 21    🔁 8    💬 3    📌 0
Post image Post image

Coding RCTs for a meta-analysis…

11.04.2025 17:18 — 👍 36    🔁 3    💬 3    📌 0

The meta-analysis on the relationship between Fluoride and IQ by Taylor et al. (2025) that RFK Jr. has cited contains major methodological flaws and data integrity issues that we describe in the following pre-print (submitted to meta-psychology): osf.io/preprints/os...

08.04.2025 16:58 — 👍 95    🔁 56    💬 5    📌 8

Another great meta-science contribution by @matthewbjane.bsky.social and others.

This and his re-analysis of the “social media causes harm” meta-analysis are great examples of how we can use science to serve society without necessarily having to be “activists”

09.04.2025 06:47 — 👍 17    🔁 2    💬 0    📌 0

The notorious MBJ and his crew are at it again! 🔥 🔥
#RStats #PyData #Stats #EconSky #DataBS

08.04.2025 20:07 — 👍 11    🔁 2    💬 0    📌 0
OSF

The meta-analysis on the relationship between Fluoride and IQ by Taylor et al. (2025) that RFK Jr. has cited contains major methodological flaws and data integrity issues that we describe in the following pre-print (submitted to meta-psychology): osf.io/preprints/os...

08.04.2025 18:02 — 👍 6    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
PubPeer - Fluoride Exposure and Children's IQ Scores: A Systematic Rev... There are comments on PubPeer for publication: Fluoride Exposure and Children's IQ Scores: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2025)

Here is the link to our pub-peer comment pubpeer.org/publications...

08.04.2025 17:41 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

Most studies in the meta-analysis are no more detailed than the following:

“Area A has low fluoride water levels, Area B has high fluoride water levels, and area A has a higher mean IQ”

No matching or balancing of covariates. Distinct geographic areas differ more than just their fluoride levels.

08.04.2025 17:35 — 👍 5    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

@matthewbjane is following 20 prominent accounts