Jeremy Bates's Avatar

Jeremy Bates

@batesv45.bsky.social

NY lawyer. Sued Trump derivatively o/b/o U.S. on Jan. 19, 2021. Biden's DOJ moved to dismiss my case. Years later, they tried to prosecute Trump. How'd that turn out, General Garland?

742 Followers  |  958 Following  |  566 Posts  |  Joined: 14.11.2023  |  2.6529

Latest posts by batesv45.bsky.social on Bluesky

Indeed. The Right Reverend Mariann Budde, Bishop of Washington (Episcopal).

10.10.2025 22:43 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

We shall see.
Much about the Comey and James indictments is unusual.

10.10.2025 14:47 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Suspect the malicious-prosecution MTD will cite it though.

10.10.2025 14:44 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

But see Justice Manual 9-11.233 - Presentation of Exculpatory Evidence

โ€when a prosecutor conducting a grand jury inquiry is personally aware of substantial evidence that directly negates the guilt of a subject of the investigation, the prosecutor must present or otherwise disclose such evidenceโ€

10.10.2025 14:06 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 10    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

Is there a limitations problem here as well?

09.10.2025 23:41 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Letโ€™s not construct a conspiracy of silence around Halligan.

09.10.2025 22:19 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

But see Justice Manual 9-11.233 - Presentation of Exculpatory Evidence

โ€when a prosecutor conducting a grand jury inquiry is personally aware of substantial evidence that directly negates the guilt of a subject of the investigation, the prosecutor must present or otherwise disclose such evidenceโ€

09.10.2025 22:07 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Letโ€™s not construct a conspiracy of silence around Halligan.

09.10.2025 22:05 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Itโ€™s DOJ policy.
See JM 9-11.233 - Presentation of Exculpatory Evidence

โ€when a prosecutor conducting a grand jury inquiry is personally aware of substantial evidence that directly negates the guilt of a subject of the investigation, the prosecutor must present or otherwise disclose such evidenceโ€

09.10.2025 21:43 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Query how much EXculpatory evidence Halligan presented to the grand jury?

09.10.2025 21:09 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

POTUS needs moral support tomorrow from DOJ because thereโ€™s bad news incoming from Oslo and Stockholm.

09.10.2025 20:03 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

They know he needs reassurance today.
Because no Nobel tomorrow.

09.10.2025 16:54 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

They know he needs reassurance today.
Because no Nobel tomorrow.

09.10.2025 16:52 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Correction: Friday. But point still valid.

09.10.2025 16:23 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Memorandum from the White House Physician

His โ€œannualโ€œ visit to Walter Reed was on April 11.
Is the one โ€œannualโ€ and the other โ€œyearlyโ€? Is that how theyโ€˜re trying to โ€ฆ mask this?
www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-st...

09.10.2025 12:23 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 8    ๐Ÿ” 2    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Memorandum from the White House Physician

The last โ€œannualโ€ doctorโ€˜s visit was on April 11.
www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-st...

08.10.2025 23:40 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Is all this happening because the Nobel Peace Prize is announced tomorrow?

08.10.2025 21:26 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Make it look like a parade.

05.10.2025 18:47 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

American otherwise. Iโ€™ve only heard โ€œkeep schtumโ€œ from Brits.
Would be interesting to know whether it goes back, in the UK, to WW2?
Has a โ€œloose lips sink shipsโ€ feel to it.

05.10.2025 18:32 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Most pundits, reporters, and nonprofit employees have employer-sponsored health plans and are not eligible for either Medicare or Medicaid. So these issues rarely matter to them directly. Leading to, as you say, shallow takes.

05.10.2025 18:20 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

This point--intent of POTUS--was the most interesting part.
How often do federal judges accuse POTUS of bad faith?
Is that conclusion comport with the notion of CJ Roberts that presidential state of mind cannot be inquired into?
Or does his notion apply only to criminal cases against POTUS?

05.10.2025 12:31 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

We are about to find out whether Kavanaugh's opinion was, in effect, a test that this Administration not only failed, but apparently didn't even notice.
To be clear, I am no fan of Kavanaugh; I filed a judicial-ethics complaint against him.
I'm suggesting what _might_ be going on.
Or so one hopes.

05.10.2025 12:24 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

...because Kavanugh set a _very low_ bar. And was naive in thinking this Administration would heed his rule.
But Kavanaugh is now in a position to say, I told you where my line is and you didn't even try to stay on the right side of it.
Whether that's where he intended to be is another Q. 2/3

05.10.2025 12:20 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

The thing about that Kavanaugh opinion is that one can read it on two levels--normative or positive.
If it was positive, then it was laughable and obviously naive. And, quite possible, rather racist.
But was it normative--this is the way, Executive, it _ought_ to be done?
Still bad...

05.10.2025 12:17 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

you mean the ban on denial for pre-existing conditions?

04.10.2025 21:34 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Many leftish types donโ€™t depend on the ACA. Thereforeโ€ฆ

04.10.2025 19:14 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 37    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 6    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Probably the same consultants who thought that insurers would begin sending out notices of higher ACA premiums this week.

02.10.2025 21:31 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

A lot of people on Medicaid do not realize this fact because the state program they are on has a different name.

01.10.2025 16:29 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

How much makeup were Trump and Hegseth wearing during their speeches?

01.10.2025 02:34 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Not clear that Anonymous is an American, given date format.

30.09.2025 18:04 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

@batesv45 is following 20 prominent accounts