As someone who worked on a lower income housing project in San Francisco only recently, you have zero idea how bad it can truly be.
11.11.2025 21:06 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@rainbowdaesh.bsky.social
Those who do not learn from the past are doomed to be mocked for it
As someone who worked on a lower income housing project in San Francisco only recently, you have zero idea how bad it can truly be.
11.11.2025 21:06 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0βMost billionaires donβt support democrats and especially not democratic socialistsβ is not the own you think it is.
The point, that you so obviously missed, is that any race needs a minimum threshold of money thanks to Roberts. Even Mamdani needed large financial backers.
This is a complete work of fiction.
www.newsweek.com/billionaires...
For those who are about to cave, we (do not) salute you.
11.11.2025 16:04 β π 12 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Someone needs to shove this nerd into a locker immediately.
Dunking on him like itβs NBA Jam doesnβt count.
I didnβt know any Brewster Buffaloes survived the war intact.
Or is he a Breda Lince from the old country?
That wasnβt a defense of Schumer, but the sad reality (thanks Roberts) is that you need a minimum amount of money to actually run for office anywhere now.
11.11.2025 15:35 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Yeah, the average MAGA needing to know about complex foreign currency markets to explain your BS is a great look.
Next thing is that all MAGAβs will be instantly experts on things like virology, germ theory, genderβ¦ ahh beans.
Schumer one skill (and heβs actually incredible at it if you know ball) is fundraising which is why he has the job in the first place.
Warren canβt replace that.
Honestly Van Hollen is probably the best answer here.
If you want to watch Schumer shit his pants just watch him speak on the senate floor.
10.11.2025 16:29 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Literally what this post represents.
10.11.2025 16:20 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0This wasnβt about healthcare, this was about bailing out the airline industry and their shareholders.
10.11.2025 14:51 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The problem is they think their base are only three things.
Pundits
Donors
Dem / centrist aligned think tanks
Also she was just elected there so she has time to recover from this.
10.11.2025 01:50 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Shit, yeah him to.
Fucking Fetterman.
King, Hassan, Durban, Shaheen, Kaine, and Masto (sorry, I forgot Kaine was a yes).
Who's the other yes vote?
Also, from the no's I've seen I don't even think this passes.
They have 5 by my count. Maybe 6 max and IIRC they needed 7 with Rand Paul being a hard R no.
Gilibrand is a no actually.
10.11.2025 01:36 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Ossoff is probably a no since he's up for reelection and this would be career suicide.
10.11.2025 01:35 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Kelly is a no. IIRC another person who was negotiating earlier and thought to be one of the mods is a no.
Also Schumer is a no.
That's a lot of if's though.
And Vought will absolutely not give a fuck about what congress sends him unless there's actual mechanisms to neuter him.
Wait, they actually caved or is the published bill just republican posturing?
10.11.2025 00:00 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I want Hollywood to start remaking classic movies with muppets and only 1 real actor.
09.11.2025 23:58 β π 12 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0In minecraft, everything is legal
09.11.2025 23:51 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Ben Shapiro is doing a Weekend at Bernie's bit with the corpse of Charlie Kirk in a trench coat and the staffers at the DNC are just seeing how far Ben's taking it while laughing.
09.11.2025 23:15 β π 4 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0I hope you call up his office and have a Cory Chase porn playing when they pick up.
That's the 9/11 I'll never forget.
Both of mine are hard no's.
Sadly as a CA resident I get the least amount of representation in the senate outside of being a DC or Puerto Rico or Guam resident.
Considering you know absolutely fuck all about well... everything regarding this situation other than your moral outrage which is worth fuck all in the real world... thanks?
09.11.2025 22:49 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0