's Avatar

@hadrian99.bsky.social

186 Followers  |  231 Following  |  305 Posts  |  Joined: 06.10.2025  |  2.338

Latest posts by hadrian99.bsky.social on Bluesky

Don’t give away constitutional rights, Chuck. That would be your legacy long after you’re gone.

10.02.2026 04:06 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

They should have made Bobby Scott’s district slightly less Democratic in order to shore up some of the others. I guess he needed to win 70% of the vote instead of 65%.

07.02.2026 15:43 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Dems need to identify exactly which locations need to be secured and guarded by local law enforcement to defend against unlawful search and seizure during the course of an election. Tabulation centers, for example.

07.02.2026 03:10 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Article co-written by Grok and some intern who previously worked at the Daily Caller.

06.02.2026 20:09 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This guy sounds like he learned about elections and politics on X, all in the last few months to justify the job he has. Possessed of a certainty that non-citizens are voting in Minnesota’s election in sufficient numbers to swing elections.

06.02.2026 19:55 β€” πŸ‘ 11    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Not necessarily true. Assuming it passes the House the Republicans in the Senate can do a β€œcarve-out” of the filibuster to pass this if they want.

06.02.2026 17:11 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Well, I guess it’s hard to give up winning your race by 40 points.

06.02.2026 02:21 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

These guys don’t ever have to worry or even think about the societal ramifications. Just trade-offs to be hand-waved against.

04.02.2026 19:58 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Sure, we already know about the political group chats.

04.02.2026 02:57 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I hope one day that the media will write stories about how incompetent the tech and private equity elite really are.

04.02.2026 02:52 β€” πŸ‘ 11    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

His party controls the House and yet he acts powerless and disinterested in proving his allegations.

03.02.2026 19:42 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Maybe they’ll acknowledge any truth to that as soon as you acknowledge that you’ve been wrong about the impact and rightness of increasing the salience of immigration enforcement (in ways that benefit Democrats and the public).

03.02.2026 18:59 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I think we should spend less time worried about people who are not reliable voters for the Democratic Party and progressive causes.

02.02.2026 20:06 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Support for freedom and democracy except for in all those countries where the opposite is convenient for Chuck’s interests.

02.02.2026 17:07 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The person you’re engaging with thinks the Democratic Party and its voters are the greater evil. That’s why they are this way.

01.02.2026 23:43 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Ask the Mayor to order the local police to escort the next protest march.

01.02.2026 04:52 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

When we read about fascism in the history books it’s hard to believe the people let it happen but they did. Same story now.

30.01.2026 20:21 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

And that only sets them up to look like weak losers to their own voters every time a video of the next ICE abuse gets leaked.

29.01.2026 23:33 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Schumer and his allies are desperate to help fund ICE and allow them to do their work as long as they don’t make Dems look too bad in the process.

29.01.2026 21:59 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The WSJ is a right wing newspaper. Everything comes with that editorial slant, even the news side.

29.01.2026 21:16 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Well, yes BUT they also technically don’t have the power to make Republicans do any of the things currently up for debate.

29.01.2026 21:08 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

As I said.

29.01.2026 20:58 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Charles, those appropriated funds can be clawed back through rescissions (worth trying to get that now) or later if Dems win back the House.

29.01.2026 20:56 β€” πŸ‘ 24    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

No rescissions as of yet.

29.01.2026 20:52 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Jeffrey Goldberg likes to hire his friends.

29.01.2026 19:23 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The Turkish name for Muhammad, even.

28.01.2026 17:17 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This is a garbage newspaper that lies to help Republicans.

28.01.2026 14:45 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Terrible. They’ve massacred a generation of dissent given the demographics of protests likely skew younger.

26.01.2026 23:54 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Damn, these people were naive as hell. Anyway, they should help create a better newspaper.

26.01.2026 23:36 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

NY Dems could actually get to work on redistricting that shores up these districts and allows for better people to win them.

26.01.2026 22:37 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@hadrian99 is following 20 prominent accounts