I forgot about Schmid, but yes - I agree that he's the most hawkish voter.
17.09.2025 02:34 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@zubey.bsky.social
I worry about the future professionally.
I forgot about Schmid, but yes - I agree that he's the most hawkish voter.
17.09.2025 02:34 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I think there is a not insignificant chance (15%) that we get one dissent in favor of holding. Goolsbee would be my guess.
17.09.2025 02:10 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0A substack writer looks at Bill Pulteโs background
open.substack.com/pub/keubiko/...
Exclusive: Bill Pulte accused Fed Governor Lisa Cook of fraud. His relatives filed housing claims similar to hers. Via Reuters
05.09.2025 21:23 โ ๐ 1526 ๐ 434 ๐ฌ 48 ๐ 49Zaslav?
21.08.2025 02:05 โ ๐ 8 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 2Interesting observation. Thanks for sharing. Does the higher sensitivity to asset price declines among the wealthy affect your conclusion?
11.08.2025 22:10 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Yup, you're right. My point was more about seeing a decline in real activity in lower income cohorts.
07.08.2025 22:33 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0K shaped economy? MCD domestic foot traffic down
07.08.2025 21:15 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Once we're at the landing point with collection, how are you expecting the cumulative burden to be split?
15.07.2025 19:31 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Ah, you're right! So essentially no pass-through like you said. Makes Goldman's assumption of 70% pass-through even funnier.
15.07.2025 15:08 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I know PCE is better, but we already have CPI - core goods shows .22 from April to June, with almost the entirety in June.
So 1/4 pass-through over 3 mo. My 2/3 estimate is based on just June data (assuming measurement lags). I think 1/4 - 1/2 is a safe bet.
fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CUSR0...
What's the evidence that pass through is limited? Based on the rise in core goods, it looks like ~50% is passing through to consumers.
Rough math:
3% monthly increase in net tariffs * 14% import share * 50% gets us to the 0.2 in this morning's CPI report.
How confident are you that Powell will stay on as a regular governor? As a huge fan of his stewardship, I'm really hoping he does, but I can't read him.
12.07.2025 00:12 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0This is an argument that today's market optimists make - that today's best companies are uniquely valuable.
I think a fair counter is that we've seen past periods of innovation where tech dominates and yet valuations still mean revert. Some relevant charts:
www.morganstanley.com/im/publicati...
Retail sales are most likely to be impacted and CPI the least, it seems
09.05.2025 23:23 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0There's absolutely a level of hysteria in the online discourse. But the amount of executive overreach does hint that there's a grain of truth behind it.
31.03.2025 17:54 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Saw one in Phoenix
26.03.2025 19:31 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0When does it get priced in tho
26.03.2025 19:30 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0If the term premium going to zero is an indication of how yields might evolve, the long end has further to fall. I think Andy at Damped Spring favors the long end now atm, unlike last fall.
22.03.2025 02:15 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0On the other side, are you worries about Fed/contractor layoffs causing a disorderly cooling in the labor market?
05.03.2025 04:58 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Thanks! As a newbie to the labor market, it's still surprising to me that just understanding the data sources is a challenge in itself.
10.12.2024 04:06 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Would the revision be released on March 5th, 2025 based on this calendar?
www.bls.gov/cew/release-...