Dawn Muspratt's Avatar

Dawn Muspratt

@dawnmuspratt.bsky.social

Would-be builder, Grannie, greenie

533 Followers  |  2,340 Following  |  2 Posts  |  Joined: 01.01.2024  |  1.767

Latest posts by dawnmuspratt.bsky.social on Bluesky

my great-grandparents arrived in the UK in the 1890s with nothing.
they sold pickles from the front room window, took in laundry, worked as tailors.
their children were nurses, teachers, salesmen.
their grandchildren were professors, designers, opticians, doctors, magistrates, entrepreneurs.

07.12.2025 08:59 — 👍 2451    🔁 657    💬 9    📌 32
Post image

Most of the public think net migration increased last year, when in fact numbers halved.

New findings from the Ipsos/British Future Immigration Attitudes Tracker show that 56% of the public thinks immigration increased last year. Just 1 in 6 realise it was down
www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025...

27.11.2025 00:45 — 👍 197    🔁 104    💬 9    📌 13
Post image

"These estimates suggest that by 2025, Brexit had reduced UK GDP by 6% to 8%, with the impact accumulating gradually over time. We estimate that investment was reduced by between 12% and 18%, employment by 3% to 4% and productivity by 3% to 4%"

Link: www.nber.org/papers/w34459

26.11.2025 08:42 — 👍 30    🔁 20    💬 3    📌 3
A chart showing child poverty in the UK increasing sharply if the two child limit remains in place, and falling if it is scrapped.

A chart showing child poverty in the UK increasing sharply if the two child limit remains in place, and falling if it is scrapped.

Why the two-child limit has to go, in a chart.

25.11.2025 16:28 — 👍 408    🔁 148    💬 20    📌 10
Preview
Combined epidemiological and economic modelling | Institute for Government The pandemic showed the need for government to improve its use of modelling.

Hot on the heels of yesterday's Covid inquiry report on decision making, @shaina-sangha.bsky.social and I have a new report out today looking at how combined epidemiological-economic modelling could help government better prepare for future pandemics www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publication/...

21.11.2025 09:33 — 👍 12    🔁 12    💬 1    📌 0
Stripping rights from refugees today endangers us all tomorrow
 
When I was 13, I visited a Nazi concentration camp for the first time, confronting my country’s dark history always—and rightly—a bedrock in my growing up. 
 
One image from that visit has stayed with me ever since: a display of prisoners’ personal possessions. 
 
It revealed a world in which those imprisoned were stripped not only of their freedom but of the last tangible traces of their humanity. That systematic erasure was the most important precondition for murdering millions.
 
Now, as a historian, I know that history does not flow into the present in a straight line, and direct comparisons are rarely appropriate. They certainly are not here.
 
But history is the one compass humanity has. Too often we choose to ignore it. 
 
The Home Secretary’s proposals for changes to the UK’s asylum system represent such a moment of failure. 
 
Yet the most troubling aspect of Labour’s frantic efforts to appear tough on immigration is not even the historical echoes that taking refugees’ possessions invokes. It is that cost recovery is not the real purpose of the rationale behind it. 
 
The true aim is to appeal to a particular audience—those who take satisfaction in seeing people seeking refuge deprived of what little they have.

Stripping rights from refugees today endangers us all tomorrow   When I was 13, I visited a Nazi concentration camp for the first time, confronting my country’s dark history always—and rightly—a bedrock in my growing up.    One image from that visit has stayed with me ever since: a display of prisoners’ personal possessions.    It revealed a world in which those imprisoned were stripped not only of their freedom but of the last tangible traces of their humanity. That systematic erasure was the most important precondition for murdering millions.   Now, as a historian, I know that history does not flow into the present in a straight line, and direct comparisons are rarely appropriate. They certainly are not here.   But history is the one compass humanity has. Too often we choose to ignore it.    The Home Secretary’s proposals for changes to the UK’s asylum system represent such a moment of failure.    Yet the most troubling aspect of Labour’s frantic efforts to appear tough on immigration is not even the historical echoes that taking refugees’ possessions invokes. It is that cost recovery is not the real purpose of the rationale behind it.    The true aim is to appeal to a particular audience—those who take satisfaction in seeing people seeking refuge deprived of what little they have.

It is hard to imagine a more troubling approach to policymaking, and that becomes even clearer when we consider the Home Secretary’s proposals in context.
 
As of June 2025, there were 42.5 million refugees globally. Over 70% are hosted by low- and middle-income countries. The UK hosts 548,000 refugees; that is 0.78% of the UK population. Around 110,000 people are in receipt of asylum support; that is 0.15% of the UK population.
 
It is unconscionable that such a small and vulnerable population can be targeted with deliberate cruelty and weaponised for assumed political gain.
 
And that is all this will ever be. The core miscalculation is believing that adopting these positions will neutralise Reform. 
 
Both historical knowledge and current research show the opposite. Mainstreaming extremist policies legitimises them further and aids only the original. Each step towards Reform’s territory simply gives Reform more power.
 
But our political discourse has been so degraded over the last decade that many no longer even recognise policies—or the language that frames them—as extreme. 
 
That is how the Home Secretary can speak so casually of desperate people seeking sanctuary as recipients of a ‘golden ticket’ as though the context is Willy Wonka’s chocolate factory rather than countries torn apart by war and starved by famine.

It is hard to imagine a more troubling approach to policymaking, and that becomes even clearer when we consider the Home Secretary’s proposals in context.   As of June 2025, there were 42.5 million refugees globally. Over 70% are hosted by low- and middle-income countries. The UK hosts 548,000 refugees; that is 0.78% of the UK population. Around 110,000 people are in receipt of asylum support; that is 0.15% of the UK population.   It is unconscionable that such a small and vulnerable population can be targeted with deliberate cruelty and weaponised for assumed political gain.   And that is all this will ever be. The core miscalculation is believing that adopting these positions will neutralise Reform.    Both historical knowledge and current research show the opposite. Mainstreaming extremist policies legitimises them further and aids only the original. Each step towards Reform’s territory simply gives Reform more power.   But our political discourse has been so degraded over the last decade that many no longer even recognise policies—or the language that frames them—as extreme.    That is how the Home Secretary can speak so casually of desperate people seeking sanctuary as recipients of a ‘golden ticket’ as though the context is Willy Wonka’s chocolate factory rather than countries torn apart by war and starved by famine.

Speak of her ‘moral mission’ to withdraw support, alleging that ‘illegal migration is tearing our country apart.’ And warn of ‘dark forces stirring up anger,’ oblivious to her own role: from the use of blurry, dehumanising images of refugees to spread falsehoods about their impact on communities, to the equally false description of refugee movements as illegal migration. 
 
I suggest the Home Secretary find a mirror if she is keen to understand who is helping turn anger into hate.
 
Because it is the mainstreaming of far-right talking points that the Home Secretary’s proposals represent that is really tearing our country apart.
 
For when a policy looks like the far right, speaks to the far right and is hailed by the far right as being far right, it is far right. There is a reason Stephen Yaxley-Lennon is jubilant and speaks of ‘the Overton window having been obliterated.’
 
This makes a mockery of the Prime Minister’s recent comments on the urgent need to tackle racism. But it also raises alarming questions about the impact this will have on communities around the country, many of which are already deeply divided. 
 
The proposed policies will do nothing for these struggling communities, because their problems simply do not stem from people seeking sanctuary with us. In fact: for as long as politicians focus on immigrants and refugees as the cause of our problems, they will fail to deliver for the British people.
 
But it is important to grasp the impact of the Home Secretary’s proposals as they carry broader consequences for all of us.

Speak of her ‘moral mission’ to withdraw support, alleging that ‘illegal migration is tearing our country apart.’ And warn of ‘dark forces stirring up anger,’ oblivious to her own role: from the use of blurry, dehumanising images of refugees to spread falsehoods about their impact on communities, to the equally false description of refugee movements as illegal migration.    I suggest the Home Secretary find a mirror if she is keen to understand who is helping turn anger into hate.   Because it is the mainstreaming of far-right talking points that the Home Secretary’s proposals represent that is really tearing our country apart.   For when a policy looks like the far right, speaks to the far right and is hailed by the far right as being far right, it is far right. There is a reason Stephen Yaxley-Lennon is jubilant and speaks of ‘the Overton window having been obliterated.’   This makes a mockery of the Prime Minister’s recent comments on the urgent need to tackle racism. But it also raises alarming questions about the impact this will have on communities around the country, many of which are already deeply divided.    The proposed policies will do nothing for these struggling communities, because their problems simply do not stem from people seeking sanctuary with us. In fact: for as long as politicians focus on immigrants and refugees as the cause of our problems, they will fail to deliver for the British people.   But it is important to grasp the impact of the Home Secretary’s proposals as they carry broader consequences for all of us.

Suggestions for changes to how the European Convention on Human Rights is applied are particularly concerning. Requiring judges to prioritise ‘public safety’—falsely implying refugees pose a threat—would qualify human rights for a specific group.
 
And once one accepts that human rights can be qualified for one group, one creates tools that can be used against anyone.
 
So what these proposals really mean goes far beyond asylum policy. This is about the kind of country we will have in the future. If human rights are no longer universal, they become a means for exclusion and control. 
 
That is why stripping rights from refugees today can only enable a system that endangers all our rights tomorrow. 
 
And that is why our historical compass matters and why we have to use it now. Because that compass tells us without doubt that when first they come for one group that is never where it ends. 

Suggestions for changes to how the European Convention on Human Rights is applied are particularly concerning. Requiring judges to prioritise ‘public safety’—falsely implying refugees pose a threat—would qualify human rights for a specific group.   And once one accepts that human rights can be qualified for one group, one creates tools that can be used against anyone.   So what these proposals really mean goes far beyond asylum policy. This is about the kind of country we will have in the future. If human rights are no longer universal, they become a means for exclusion and control.    That is why stripping rights from refugees today can only enable a system that endangers all our rights tomorrow.    And that is why our historical compass matters and why we have to use it now. Because that compass tells us without doubt that when first they come for one group that is never where it ends. 

Tried to get this published but no luck, so might as well ‘publish’ it here so it’s not a complete waste!

➡️ Stripping rights from refugees today endangers us all tomorrow

#asylum #Mahmood #history #humanrights

18.11.2025 20:03 — 👍 203    🔁 118    💬 11    📌 7

Clean Energy accounted for all electricity growth this year. Gas/Coal were basically a wash and will be for years to come for electricity generation.

We need to ramp up batteries because they are 90% cheaper than distribution grid upgrades which is the main reason we have rate increases.

14.11.2025 04:06 — 👍 290    🔁 99    💬 4    📌 4

The vast majority of people who have immigrated into Britain did so because they were invited and we needed them for work.

This is a fact the Media and all the racists want to ignore.

14.11.2025 13:13 — 👍 115    🔁 33    💬 4    📌 0
Post image

The new 2025 Global Carbon Budget finds that fossil fuel emissions will reach a new high in 2025. Total CO2 emissions (including land use) remain flat at 2024 levels.

While the land sink is up from 2024, carbon sinks are weakening: www.carbonbrief.org/...

13.11.2025 03:25 — 👍 150    🔁 74    💬 1    📌 14
Post image Post image Post image

With a “WOW!,” President Trump posts a claim about DOGE and “royalties linked to Obamacare” that originated on a satirical website. That site’s own About section reads: “Everything on this website is fiction… If you believe that it is real, you should have your head examined.”

09.11.2025 15:33 — 👍 5076    🔁 1601    💬 280    📌 311
Post image

Electrification could now reach 75% of all energy demand, as the road-transport and heating sectors rapidly electrify 🔥🚗

These two sectors account for 50% of global energy use and are now ready to switch from fossil molecules to clean electrons.

https://loom.ly/BwyhReA

08.11.2025 11:01 — 👍 83    🔁 26    💬 2    📌 5

I’m fed up with Labour politicians feeling they have to cosplay the far right. By all means, let’s have a serious debate about migration, but without dehumanizing migrants, or uttering facile soundbites. 😡

08.11.2025 22:25 — 👍 227    🔁 51    💬 13    📌 4
Post image

Seems fair to me.

08.11.2025 22:08 — 👍 446    🔁 89    💬 9    📌 5

Her husband told her that detainees at Broadview had to get up at 5am to get in line for one bathroom. He often peed himself. One time he had to wait until 2pm to use the bathroom. You could only use the bathroom once a day. He said the agents would beat you if you used the bathroom on yourself.

07.11.2025 03:08 — 👍 5674    🔁 1391    💬 18    📌 129
Preview
The Shutdown of U.S.A.I.D. Has Already Killed Hundreds of Thousands The short documentary “Rovina’s Choice” tells the story of what goes when aid goes.

One analytical model shows that, as of November 5th, the dismantling of U.S.A.I.D. has already caused the deaths of 600,000 people, two-thirds of them children. https://newyorkermag.visitlink.me/jUzNSc

06.11.2025 21:00 — 👍 9282    🔁 6055    💬 438    📌 1291
Post image

I'm still looking for participants to interview about Reclaim the Night, squatting/housing co-ops and feminist architecture! Please share 💗

31.10.2025 11:56 — 👍 4    🔁 14    💬 0    📌 0

Me: *picks up megaphone*
TELL ME WHAT COMMUNITY LOOKS LIKE

You:
THIS IS WHAT COMMUNITY LOOKS LIKE

04.11.2025 17:51 — 👍 36    🔁 10    💬 0    📌 0
Post image

Page One in Milwaukee

#SNAP

01.11.2025 16:29 — 👍 1768    🔁 525    💬 73    📌 12
Post image

Gonna be honest here and say as a journalist working in Westminster this makes me want to cry

My grandparents had to deal with this crap and now we are, it’s so wrong

How are we here where politicians feel so emboldened to say things that are so obviously racist?

25.10.2025 18:19 — 👍 284    🔁 81    💬 22    📌 3
Video thumbnail

Thank you, Chicago.

25.10.2025 01:31 — 👍 8348    🔁 2380    💬 164    📌 227
Preview
Revealed: Car ownership eats up a quarter of poorest households’ incomes | IPPR Poorest households spend a quarter (25 per cent) of their income on their carTransport costs take up twice the share of income for the least well-offIPPR r

"“Too many people are locked out of opportunity because the transport system simply doesn’t work for them."

"Many families can't afford a car or would spend a huge proportion of their weekly budget running one."

#TransportJustice

@betterstreetsforbirmingham.org

www.ippr.org/media-office...

11.10.2025 22:04 — 👍 47    🔁 17    💬 5    📌 3
Preview
Covid-19: Excluding doctors from vaccination programme puts patients at risk, clinicians warn Doctors have warned that the government’s decision to exclude health and social care workers from its covid vaccination programme is putting patients at risk and will have a major impact on an overstr...

I just can't even on this one.

HCPs have NO CHOICE over whether to be exposed to Covid.

Those on lower incomes will struggle to afford the c£100 for private vaccine - and they shouldn't have to do so

We lost over 1,000 workers 2010-1. This is both stupid & insulting.
www.bmj.com/content/391/...

12.10.2025 10:05 — 👍 44    🔁 25    💬 6    📌 1
Post image

This is the only anti-Brexit argument you'll ever need ...

12.10.2025 10:14 — 👍 61    🔁 17    💬 3    📌 2
The famous photo of three rifle-wielding women partisans walking down Via Brera, Milan, on 26 April 1945.

The famous photo of three rifle-wielding women partisans walking down Via Brera, Milan, on 26 April 1945.

The girlfriends who founded Antifa.

09.10.2025 02:46 — 👍 376    🔁 75    💬 11    📌 5
A map of the world showing how levels of worry in most countries are greater than 70%. Source: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, International Public Opinion on Climate Change, 2023.

A map of the world showing how levels of worry in most countries are greater than 70%. Source: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, International Public Opinion on Climate Change, 2023.

Two of the most common climate misconceptions I see, even among knowledgeable folks, are that (1) most people aren't worried about climate change, and (2) if they were, they'd act.

Not true! Data show (1) most people are worried, but (2) they won’t act if they don’t know what to do-and most don’t.

06.10.2025 15:24 — 👍 632    🔁 272    💬 21    📌 18
Video thumbnail

She was arrested for holding a sign reading:

“I do not support the proscription of Palestine Action”

How that would warrant arrest is very unclear. I wonder if the police here even understand the boundaries of the bizarre law they’ve been forced to enforce.

05.10.2025 21:40 — 👍 2734    🔁 1137    💬 176    📌 127

Once you get into the habit... UK Tories suggest to cut development aid spending to 0.1% GNI.

It used to be 0.7% under Cameron, then Johnson cut it 'temporarily' to 0.5%, and Starmer further to 0.3%.

Though this is but an opposition party's promise, the quick disappearance of UK aid is stunning.

06.10.2025 06:31 — 👍 49    🔁 18    💬 4    📌 4

*gasp*

05.10.2025 21:03 — 👍 3136    🔁 1069    💬 187    📌 138
Preview
Peacehaven: Fire at East Sussex mosque probed as 'hate crime' Video appears to show two people in balaclavas at the mosque before a large blaze spreads.

Men in balaclavas set fire to a mosque in East Sussex last night. It's only appearing on the BBC's local coverage, rather than its main national headlines, despite coming just a week after the (also under-reported) firebombing of an asylum hotel in London last week
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...

05.10.2025 08:19 — 👍 1077    🔁 825    💬 49    📌 74

“Terrible things are happening outside. Poor helpless people are being dragged out of their homes. Families are torn apart. Men, women, and children are separated. Children come home from school to find that their parents have disappeared.”

Diary of Anne Frank
January 13, 1943

04.10.2025 20:17 — 👍 17164    🔁 8037    💬 259    📌 340

@dawnmuspratt is following 19 prominent accounts