Mathias Boulanger's Avatar

Mathias Boulanger

@mathias-boulanger.bsky.social

Senior Bioinformatician / data analyst at @EMBL GeneCore - Ph.D in health biology and genomics | Former postdoc at @EMBL Krebs lab - PhD student at @igmm

65 Followers  |  173 Following  |  10 Posts  |  Joined: 18.08.2025  |  1.9247

Latest posts by mathias-boulanger.bsky.social on Bluesky

Just brilliat work by Kasit and colleagues in @arnaudkr.bsky.social's group @embl.org. This is leveraging the "everyday" length of ONT (20KB) plus exogenous modification to sort out co-occupancy between enhancers and promoters (and inter-enhancer).

18.08.2025 20:48 β€” πŸ‘ 20    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

This is not a HiC map! Ever wondered if multiple enhancers get activated simultaneously? We measured chromatin accessibility on thousands of molecules by nanopore to create genome-wide co-accessibility maps. Proud of @mathias-boulanger.bsky.social @kasitc.bsky.social Biology in the threadπŸ‘‡

18.08.2025 13:00 β€” πŸ‘ 111    πŸ” 34    πŸ’¬ 10    πŸ“Œ 0

Huge thanks to the co-first author @kasitc.bsky.social Also thanks to Rene, Marc Jan, Karine, Kim, and especially @arnaudkr.bsky.social @embl.org @dfg.de.
Finally, Kasit will be presenting the story at the @cshlnews.bsky.social #cshlmoet next week! Please stop by if you are around!

18.08.2025 12:39 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

What about transcription? we could link changes in activity at enhancer to the consequences at a co-accessible promoter!

18.08.2025 12:39 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Can we prove coordination in their activity? Using regulatory changes between cell types, we show that co-accessible enhancers co-vary, demonstrating the dependency between them.

18.08.2025 12:39 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

What regulates co-accessibility? We found that certain TF motifs are enriched in co-accessible CREs (vs independent ones). These include several usual suspects such as Su(Hw), and Trl (GAF).

18.08.2025 12:39 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Co-accessible pairs aren’t always the closest neighbours! For each pair of CREs, we tested if they are co-accessible more often than expected by chance, creating a co-accessibility map across CREs.

18.08.2025 12:39 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Here is an example locus: we can resolve chromatin accessibility for a promoter and 8 enhancers located up to 20kb away! β€” all on the same DNA molecules.

18.08.2025 12:39 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

We used Single-molecule footprinting (SMF) to methylate accessible regions, combined with Nanopore long-read sequencing. At each locus, we collected thousands of molecules β€” enough to quantify coordinated accessibility across distant CREs up to 30 kbs apart!

18.08.2025 12:39 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Activity of most genes is controlled by multiple enhancers, but is there activation coordinated? We leveraged Nanopore to identify a specific set of elements that are simultaneously accessible on the same DNA molecules and are coordinated in their activation www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1... @embl.org

18.08.2025 12:39 β€” πŸ‘ 19    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Here is an example locus: we can resolve chromatin accessibility for a promoter and 8 enhancers located up to 20kb away! β€” all on the same DNA molecules.

18.08.2025 12:32 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

We used Single-molecule footprinting (SMF) to methylate accessible regions, combined with Nanopore long-read sequencing. At each locus, we collected thousands of molecules β€” enough to quantify coordinated accessibility across distant CREs up to 30 kbs apart!

18.08.2025 12:32 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@mathias-boulanger is following 20 prominent accounts