“[James Talarico] was supposed to be here, but we were told in no uncertain terms by our network’s lawyers, who called us directly, that we could not have him on the broadcast,” Colbert said.
17.02.2026 06:10 — 👍 2546 🔁 971 💬 70 📌 65@fooeynet.bsky.social
Seattle • Year-round bike commuter • Miss Tex-Mex
“[James Talarico] was supposed to be here, but we were told in no uncertain terms by our network’s lawyers, who called us directly, that we could not have him on the broadcast,” Colbert said.
17.02.2026 06:10 — 👍 2546 🔁 971 💬 70 📌 65m.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZlL...
16.02.2026 21:55 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Twat-splats were more common than we remember.
16.02.2026 18:56 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Question; any difference to authors by pre-ordering online via one of the big guys vs. my local bookstore?
16.02.2026 16:20 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0This looks like a book I'd judge (and buy!) by its cover.
16.02.2026 16:12 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0how do i find that post tho
15.02.2026 22:04 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0yeah but what was the stock market
15.02.2026 22:01 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I didn’t make this, but it’s pretty spot on
15.02.2026 21:50 — 👍 1608 🔁 372 💬 69 📌 38JFC this is what I get from that @ceej.online starter pack
15.02.2026 21:53 — 👍 52 🔁 0 💬 6 📌 1And people say #aisucks.
(AI sucks).
My enemy from Washington? I think you mean, my foe-lympia.
14.02.2026 20:55 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0My buddy from New Mexico? I think you mean, my palbuquerque.
14.02.2026 20:20 — 👍 156 🔁 26 💬 3 📌 1Cartoon: If anyone in Chicago knows this school or an anti ICE organization affiliated with them I would be happy to donate this art. I only wish I could have fully Sal Buscema-ed that punch :)
14.02.2026 00:25 — 👍 22005 🔁 5834 💬 167 📌 119yeah but we could have ended up with a black lady
13.02.2026 16:16 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Today's newsletter: New piece: after the Guthrie kidnapping, the Kirk assassination, and both Minneapolis shootings, the same thing happened every time. People asked AI to "enhance" blurry footage. AI invented faces.
www.readtpa.com/p/computer-e...
Reuters: U.S. HOUSE BACKS RESOLUTION THAT WOULD END TRUMP'S CANADA TARIFFS BY 219 TO 211
11.02.2026 23:20 — 👍 3421 🔁 737 💬 70 📌 96Rep. Becca Balint: This is not a game, Secretary.
Pam Bondi: I'm Attorney General
Balint: My apologies, I couldn't tell.
cc: @fluxblog.bsky.social
11.02.2026 04:22 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0bsky.app/profile/the-...
10.02.2026 23:49 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0RICHARD LEE REDEMPTION TOUR
youtu.be/evc8O-xz92k
Watters: I was walking in my street, a car drives by and I give him a wave. He rolls down the window and says, “F U fascist.” He doesn’t know I’m a fascist!
Jessica: Yes, he does. You’re on TV.
Not sure why America got booed at the Olympics but it probably has to do with our country being a bloodthirsty warmonger led by disgusting racist slobs to the point that our president is the star of the Epstein files
08.02.2026 00:24 — 👍 204 🔁 43 💬 11 📌 0When someone tells me how old their child is I say "that's such a fun age" even if it's 37
10.02.2026 01:42 — 👍 5006 🔁 455 💬 56 📌 25Dear Ms. Wolfe, Petitioner-Appellee Rümeysa Öztürk submits this Rule 28(j) letter to advise the Court that on January 29, 2026, the immigration court held that the Department of Homeland Security had not met its burden of proving removability, and the immigration court thereby terminated removal proceedings against Ms. Öztürk.' This development underscores the dangers of the government's interpretation of the Immigration and Nationality Act. Under the government's view, it could punitively detain any noncitizen in retaliation for her speech for many months, so long as it simultaneously institutes removal proceedings—no matter how unmeritorious—all without any federal court review of the lawfulness of detention at any time. To be clear, the termination of Ms. Öztürk's removal proceedings does not moot her habeas case. (By contrast, as Ms. Öztürk has argued, this appeal is moot. Br. 18-20.) Without habeas jurisdiction and the bail order that is currently in place, any government appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals would again subject Ms. Öztürk to re-detention. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.6(a). For that reason, she continues to suffer the threat of continuing "now-or-never" First and Fifth Amendment harms. Br. in Opp. 55-57.
NEW: An immigration court has terminated removal proceedings against Tufts doctoral student Rümeysa Öztürk, finding that DHS did not meet its burden of establishing that she was removable, her lawyers tell the Second Circuit. live-awp-vermont.pantheonsite.io/app/uploads/...
09.02.2026 23:38 — 👍 4851 🔁 1218 💬 14 📌 86K9 Sam and me
Hey guys
09.02.2026 21:54 — 👍 6758 🔁 218 💬 146 📌 21*fantastic*
09.02.2026 04:10 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Yeah TAMU actually licensed "the 12th Man" to us until 2016, then it became "the 12s"
09.02.2026 04:10 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Wait, did it happen, or is this the #Seahawks win? 😂 #fireworks
09.02.2026 03:24 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I mean, TBH the first response was the last item on the list.
06.02.2026 18:17 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0